Subpage under development, new version coming soon!
Subject: Ireland Vs...
I cant get NT Viewer to work at all.
4 defenders is an option, it's not going to be the rule though. I have 6 formations i can use, 4 at the back is too limiting and predictable for my liking.
Had i used 4 for Chile they still would have scored, we may have not though.
EDIT
Poland is very different to Ireland. We only have a small userbase and it's not necessary to contact all of them i can use the forum or national page.
(edited)
4 defenders is an option, it's not going to be the rule though. I have 6 formations i can use, 4 at the back is too limiting and predictable for my liking.
Had i used 4 for Chile they still would have scored, we may have not though.
EDIT
Poland is very different to Ireland. We only have a small userbase and it's not necessary to contact all of them i can use the forum or national page.
(edited)
Yes it's only a option, but to play like that You need players with speed and high defence. when You play with 4 defs You should stop most of atacks in game. i play with 4 defs, and i think that it's best option in most of games (5 defs its too much, 3 it's not enough to play nice in defence) for me You should bulid team from good defence... last season i lose only 4 goals overall, this season i also lose only 3 goals (best result in my new league) and that was the key to my wins (last 20 games in league - 17 wins and 2 draws)
Poland is very different to Ireland. We only have a small userbase and it's not necessary to contact all of them i can use the forum or national page.
right, but You must look in the future:) it will be changing - so a DB will be necessary later. so it's good that You have it now.
right, but You must look in the future:) it will be changing - so a DB will be necessary later. so it's good that You have it now.
and about any problems with DB contact with rym3k:) he should help You in everything:)
We dont have great defenders which is why i think it's more important to take posession in the middle of the field.
Think of it this way, with at the back you've got central cover, if the ball moves slightly over to the left or right the defence moves with it. Now with 4 you can do the same thing but the defender on the oposite side of the defence is pretty much unemployed. I play it so that unemployed position is taken up by one of the defensive mids. Until the recent changes i leaked very few goals as well, all thats required is a tightening up. It goes without saying that i wouldn't be playing 3 at the back against someone like Italy but for the lower teams it's an option. I selected Chile for that exact purpose. I wanted a team to test out the 3-5-2 and they did it well. They showed me the problems and i've fixed them. That was always the plan.
Think of it this way, with at the back you've got central cover, if the ball moves slightly over to the left or right the defence moves with it. Now with 4 you can do the same thing but the defender on the oposite side of the defence is pretty much unemployed. I play it so that unemployed position is taken up by one of the defensive mids. Until the recent changes i leaked very few goals as well, all thats required is a tightening up. It goes without saying that i wouldn't be playing 3 at the back against someone like Italy but for the lower teams it's an option. I selected Chile for that exact purpose. I wanted a team to test out the 3-5-2 and they did it well. They showed me the problems and i've fixed them. That was always the plan.
We dont have great defenders which is why i think it's more important to take posession in the middle of the field.
Yes - but for me its the reason to play with 4 defs. becouse 3 not good defs could make problems in every game:)
but You are a coach:) You will decieded:) I hope that I'm wrong in that.
Yes - but for me its the reason to play with 4 defs. becouse 3 not good defs could make problems in every game:)
but You are a coach:) You will decieded:) I hope that I'm wrong in that.
I have an unbeaten streak of 2. Go me! :D
It's just the start, the flaws are being ironed out and by about game 5 or 6 i should have everything sorted.
If i could sort out the linkup between a 2-man mid and the forwards then i'd consider 4-4-2 more often.
It's just the start, the flaws are being ironed out and by about game 5 or 6 i should have everything sorted.
If i could sort out the linkup between a 2-man mid and the forwards then i'd consider 4-4-2 more often.
consider also some of unsimetrical tactics... with one winger or like that. they are very popular in polish higher divisions.
(edited)
(edited)
It wasn't something i'd planned on using but i'll think about it because i think it has potential. Wingers are worse then useless if they're not good enough.
thats only an example - most important in that kind of tactic is that Your team have more possibilities of play.
The problem when you play without symetrical formations is that you end up with rather large gaps on one side.
Last season i had a winger sent off in the first 10 minutes, the nearest forward got pulled out of position covering that space.
Last season i had a winger sent off in the first 10 minutes, the nearest forward got pulled out of position covering that space.
Last season i had a winger sent off in the first 10 minutes, the nearest forward got pulled out of position covering that space.
that is allways risky, also in symetrical tactic:)
(edited)
that is allways risky, also in symetrical tactic:)
(edited)
One big thing that influenced the result was your striker placement vs his. Notice how his guys were always in line with the last defender so that they could go 1 on 1 with the keeper pretty easily. Cashin and Matthews usually got the ball too deep meaning they had to best a mid or two before even thinking about beating a defence which was too compact to get through anyway. The way I see it if your strikers aren't caught offside a few times in a game then they're playing too deep.
The most effective way to get through a defence (especially with the quick strikers we have) is with through balls. With the players we have compared to the quality up against us I think a good defence with strikers properly placed will give us much more chances than trying to play an expansive midfield heavy game. In other words, more Bolton than Arsenal.
The most effective way to get through a defence (especially with the quick strikers we have) is with through balls. With the players we have compared to the quality up against us I think a good defence with strikers properly placed will give us much more chances than trying to play an expansive midfield heavy game. In other words, more Bolton than Arsenal.
My prediction: Ireland 3 Turkey 1
I really want a clean sheet in this game but i think it's too much to ask for our defenders to go 90 minutes without cocking something up. This lot are dangerous if they get their tactics right but we're better. If i get certain things right it's possible we could bury them by about 5 or 6 but we'll see.
I really want a clean sheet in this game but i think it's too much to ask for our defenders to go 90 minutes without cocking something up. This lot are dangerous if they get their tactics right but we're better. If i get certain things right it's possible we could bury them by about 5 or 6 but we'll see.