Subpage under development, new version coming soon!
Subject: Any Sca with the NT Nin?
I've been so busy this week i've not had time to look at them but i've had a rough plan since before the election. I'll sort it all out tomorrow when form is clearer.
Family, drinking, college, chatting up my lecturer, revision, more drink, more college, a conference and my grandad being extremely ill. It's been a rather busy week, now whats this about being paid...?
No pre-match announcements this week on account of me being in a bad mood. I'll only say i'm using a formation thats right but i'm not entirely comfortable with and we better win this one or i'll be changing my philosophy on i go about these games.
They changed formation :(
25 minutes in, 1 down. If we lose this i'm done with trying to play the tactical game. We should be trying to play, not trying to stop them.
25 minutes in, 1 down. If we lose this i'm done with trying to play the tactical game. We should be trying to play, not trying to stop them.
I think we were lucky, it was almost like they knew exactly what i was going to do. It's a win though and i'm pleased with that although I would have preferred 3-1 as it would be been better for the rankings but another freak goal ruined that.
Ireland gain 18.47 ranking points
If they hadn't scored it would have been 35
(edited)
Ireland gain 18.47 ranking points
If they hadn't scored it would have been 35
(edited)
Ok, first flaw to fix was the formation for the corner. I dont think trying to play offside from corners is a great idea :|
when i looked on tactic i have samething to say about defece, but to be objective i must see how it worked in game:) i hope that i will find time to look on Your match later:) now i must make a tactic for tomorrow. i will have the most dificult game ever i remember:)
Not so difficult now that he's banned :) He'll have a tough team out anyway but you could win it with chances from throw ins and corners as there won't be any position changes. I'd go with a 2332 formation to cover those forwards and make best use of the wings for throwins
---*-*---
----------
-*-----*-
----*----
--*-*-*-
---*-*---
With the 2 defenders at the back covering any striker that gets through your line of 3 defenders you might be able to stop them.
That's what I'd do anyway :) what are you planning?
---*-*---
----------
-*-----*-
----*----
--*-*-*-
---*-*---
With the 2 defenders at the back covering any striker that gets through your line of 3 defenders you might be able to stop them.
That's what I'd do anyway :) what are you planning?
Congratz on the first win fella- you were a lucky boy though :)
The two central mids were too far forward again- anytime he attacked they were behind the play which left the defense exposed. They also weren't far enough forward to do much offensively so just sat there in no mans land. You also need to swing somebody out to do your throw ins. Another advantage proper dms give you is that the defenders aren't getting the ball and trying to pass as much, they were horrible at clearing the ball today. I think our defenders aren't much use for anything but blocking- you need the dms to do the ball carrying and passing.
The two central mids were too far forward again- anytime he attacked they were behind the play which left the defense exposed. They also weren't far enough forward to do much offensively so just sat there in no mans land. You also need to swing somebody out to do your throw ins. Another advantage proper dms give you is that the defenders aren't getting the ball and trying to pass as much, they were horrible at clearing the ball today. I think our defenders aren't much use for anything but blocking- you need the dms to do the ball carrying and passing.
i will play with one winger, and will try to get to goal by left side of field (his def's are weak on this side)
two def-mids will play close to his att, and 4 defs.
something like that:
------X-X-----------
---------------------
X--------------------
---------------X-----
-------X---X--------
---------------------
-----X-X-X-X-------
the idea is - 2 att play agist 2 defs - but when winger have the ball, one of defs run to him, and one of att isn't marked.
about defence... i have a problem, becouse he have great forwards:/ they have outstanding speed and incredible shooting:/ and that's the reason why i must play so defencive. (my defs have only good speed)
two def-mids will play close to his att, and 4 defs.
something like that:
------X-X-----------
---------------------
X--------------------
---------------X-----
-------X---X--------
---------------------
-----X-X-X-X-------
the idea is - 2 att play agist 2 defs - but when winger have the ball, one of defs run to him, and one of att isn't marked.
about defence... i have a problem, becouse he have great forwards:/ they have outstanding speed and incredible shooting:/ and that's the reason why i must play so defencive. (my defs have only good speed)
I dont see how i can balance the mids really. They're either offensive or defensive, they cant do both. I dont like that formation because of the problems linking them up to the forwards.
As for the defence i thought they did a pretty good job, set-pieces aside. The first goal was my fault for setting them up badly and the 2nd was a long-shot. To bring the dm's into it i'd have to pull them even further back and i'm not going to do that. I think we can get away with having them forward because our defence is pretty good at dealing with counter-attacks.
The throwins are still clearly a problem that i'm not sure how to fix without sacrificing some positioning.
As for the defence i thought they did a pretty good job, set-pieces aside. The first goal was my fault for setting them up badly and the 2nd was a long-shot. To bring the dm's into it i'd have to pull them even further back and i'm not going to do that. I think we can get away with having them forward because our defence is pretty good at dealing with counter-attacks.
The throwins are still clearly a problem that i'm not sure how to fix without sacrificing some positioning.
Hey, well done :)
It looked tight there for a while.
You made some good selections.
The defenders would sicken ya the way they concede corners n throw-ins in danergous areas but what can ya do.
I'll have my 2 cents worth all the same.
I think a def mid in front of the back four would work well.
And off mid behind a well pushed up front 2 and
Depending on the strenght of the midfield of the next team I'd nearly advise you to centralise the wingers a bit , see what happens might strengten mid field.
It looked tight there for a while.
You made some good selections.
The defenders would sicken ya the way they concede corners n throw-ins in danergous areas but what can ya do.
I'll have my 2 cents worth all the same.
I think a def mid in front of the back four would work well.
And off mid behind a well pushed up front 2 and
Depending on the strenght of the midfield of the next team I'd nearly advise you to centralise the wingers a bit , see what happens might strengten mid field.