Subpage under development, new version coming soon!
Subject: »[U21]Selección Colombia U21
así va mi portero
Diego Armando Santamaría, edad: 18
club: las ratas, país: Colombia,
valor: 1 466 400 k.$, salario: 8 880 k.$,
superdivina [17] forma, débil [4] disciplina táctica,
altura: 172 cm, peso: 71.1 kg, IMC: 24.03
sólida [8] condición formidable [11] portería
excelente [10] rapidez deficiente [2] defensa
terrible [1] técnica terrible [1] creación
bueno [7] pases deficiente [2] anotación
Diego Armando Santamaría, edad: 18
club: las ratas, país: Colombia,
valor: 1 466 400 k.$, salario: 8 880 k.$,
superdivina [17] forma, débil [4] disciplina táctica,
altura: 172 cm, peso: 71.1 kg, IMC: 24.03
sólida [8] condición formidable [11] portería
excelente [10] rapidez deficiente [2] defensa
terrible [1] técnica terrible [1] creación
bueno [7] pases deficiente [2] anotación
Empatamos 0a0 contra Nueva Zelanda. Un partido en el el que los palos del arco donde siempre estuvo ubicado su arquero se estan moviendo todavía ahora. Al menos 4 tiros en los palos y travesaño conté (PUEDEN OBSERVARLO EN EL PARTIDO), una manera de ligar tremenda. De paso nuevamente jugamos gran parte del partido con un jugador menos en este caso un delantero. Si no eran tiros en el palo, en los manos a mano era apuntarle donde estaba el arquero o tirarla a las nubes. Estoy asqueado la verdad.
Sigue super parejo el grupo, en este caso él único que sumo de a 3 en esta fecha fue Bosnia y trepo al primer lugar en las posiciones
Bosnia 9
Colombia 8
Holanda 7
Nueva Zelanda 7
Lituania 6
Belarus 0
Sigue super parejo el grupo, en este caso él único que sumo de a 3 en esta fecha fue Bosnia y trepo al primer lugar en las posiciones
Bosnia 9
Colombia 8
Holanda 7
Nueva Zelanda 7
Lituania 6
Belarus 0
La próxima semana amistoso frente a Nicaragua. El DT no me contesta si pondrá sub 20 o un mix. Nosotros cuidaremos jugadores de cara a lo q viene
Apretado el grupo, pero si se hacen los mismos resultados de vuelta o mejores estamos adentro :)
(edited)
(edited)
Se gano por 3a0 frente a Nicaragua. Se cuidaron jugadores y jugaron un par de alternativas de recambio al equipo titular. Gracias no se lesiono ningún jugador. A pensar en lo q viene q es por los puntos frente a Nueva Zelanda
La verdad que si. Pero estos de Nueva Zelanda están con todo el culo afuera, ligan a 2 manos, además de no tener un mal plantel. No perdieron ni un solo partido en la eliminatoria. Nosotros últimamente no ligamos con el tema expulsiones y lesiones. Espero q para esta semana que viene tengamos todo el plantel a disposición
Bue por lo visto la mala fortuna esta de nuestro lado. No eh observado aun el partido, pq jugamos a primera hora de la mañana. Si bien las estadísticas indicarían q esta vez Nueva Zelanda genero mas. Lo empezamos ganando por 1a0 y de no creer en el minuto 89 nos empatan el partido. A Gonzalo de la Calle hoy le teníamos flojo de forma, lo cambie de sector para q le llegue mas a Leguizamo q metió 1 el tanto del partido.
Es una plaga de empates el grupo. Todos le han ganado a Bielorusia. Nosotros le ganamos a Lituania y Bosnia nos gano a nosotros. Todo lo demás empates... ojalá se repita lo de la primera rueda...
Es una plaga de empates el grupo. Todos le han ganado a Bielorusia. Nosotros le ganamos a Lituania y Bosnia nos gano a nosotros. Todo lo demás empates... ojalá se repita lo de la primera rueda...
have you watched the match ? Bad luck on your side? Really?
New Zealand has lost 5-6 great opportunities to score while Colombia has dominated only from 70-80 when they scored.
a fair result would be more like 3-1 not 1-1 or 0-1 as you think.
watch the game. the tactics and the players you select are always the same. easy to predict
(edited)
New Zealand has lost 5-6 great opportunities to score while Colombia has dominated only from 70-80 when they scored.
a fair result would be more like 3-1 not 1-1 or 0-1 as you think.
watch the game. the tactics and the players you select are always the same. easy to predict
(edited)
Sorry man, but get into your own business don't come here to criticize the work of our coach, he uses the same players because there are not to many options, so don't talk in things that you don't know, and perhaps maybe the draw its fair.
if I want to say my word I can come here to criticize whoever I want and I dont think its bad after all
and if it has Mancilla to play as a winger I bet he can play as a right winger.just as a "different" tactics
perhaps the draw is fair for you. for me is not. watch the game and count how many times new zealand could score
(edited)
and if it has Mancilla to play as a winger I bet he can play as a right winger.just as a "different" tactics
perhaps the draw is fair for you. for me is not. watch the game and count how many times new zealand could score
(edited)
Te lo explico en ingles y español:
1) Yo armo el equipo como crea mas conveniente, en la primera ronda en el partido contra usted, se mueven todavía ahora los palos de su arco. Por lo tanto opte por la misma táctica. Y veo que usted también jugo con la misma o me equivoco?
2) Que pretende armarme usted él equipo y elegirme los jugadores? Si quiere le juego con el arquero de delantero y él delantero de arquero.
Pongo lo mejor que tengo a disposición, no lo que usted quiera....
3) Y primero vi las estadísticas y ahora con más tiempo vi recién el partido. La verdad no se de que dominio me habla o de que vio (me parece que solo se guia por las estadísticas) , fue un partido dentro de todo parejo. Sus jugadas fueron golpes de cabeza que se fueron a miles de metros del palo y ah tenido al igual que nosotros 1 jugada en los palos. Nosotros generamos y en el área suya sus defensores lograron salvarlo antes de que nuestros delanteros patearan. Observe el minuto 81 y 82 en ella hay 2 jugadas claras de gol a nuestro favor. Su gol fue un aborto de la naturaleza, por errores en los que nuestros defensores pareciera que se pisan los cordones y no pueden rechazar.
PD: Espero que me asesore para los próximos partidos. Que le parece si salgo a jugar con un equipo sub 18?? Fandiño es buen 9 le parece??
PD 2: Ocúpese de su seleccionado que le viene haciendo bien. Saludos
I explain in English and Spanish:
1) I arm the team as it creates more convenient, in the first round in the match against you, the clubs of your bow still move now. So opt for the same tactic. And I see that you also play with the same or I am wrong?
2) What do you intend to put together the team and choose the players? If you want to play with the goalkeeper and striker archer forward.
I put the best that I have at disposal, not what you want ....
3) And first I saw the statistics and now with more time I just saw the game. The truth is I do not know what domain speaks to me or what he saw (it seems to me that it is only guided by the statistics), it was a party within all even. His plays were blows of head that went to thousands of meters of the stick and ah had just like us 1 play on the sticks. We generated and in his area his defenders managed to save him before our forwards kicked. Watch the minute 81 and 82 in it there are 2 clear plays of goal in our favor. His goal was an abortion of nature, for errors in which our defenders seem to step on the cords and can not refuse.
PS: I hope you will advise me for the next games. What do you think if I go out to play with an under 18 team ?? Fandiño is good 9 you think ??
PD 2: Take care of your selected who is doing well. regards
1) Yo armo el equipo como crea mas conveniente, en la primera ronda en el partido contra usted, se mueven todavía ahora los palos de su arco. Por lo tanto opte por la misma táctica. Y veo que usted también jugo con la misma o me equivoco?
2) Que pretende armarme usted él equipo y elegirme los jugadores? Si quiere le juego con el arquero de delantero y él delantero de arquero.
Pongo lo mejor que tengo a disposición, no lo que usted quiera....
3) Y primero vi las estadísticas y ahora con más tiempo vi recién el partido. La verdad no se de que dominio me habla o de que vio (me parece que solo se guia por las estadísticas) , fue un partido dentro de todo parejo. Sus jugadas fueron golpes de cabeza que se fueron a miles de metros del palo y ah tenido al igual que nosotros 1 jugada en los palos. Nosotros generamos y en el área suya sus defensores lograron salvarlo antes de que nuestros delanteros patearan. Observe el minuto 81 y 82 en ella hay 2 jugadas claras de gol a nuestro favor. Su gol fue un aborto de la naturaleza, por errores en los que nuestros defensores pareciera que se pisan los cordones y no pueden rechazar.
PD: Espero que me asesore para los próximos partidos. Que le parece si salgo a jugar con un equipo sub 18?? Fandiño es buen 9 le parece??
PD 2: Ocúpese de su seleccionado que le viene haciendo bien. Saludos
I explain in English and Spanish:
1) I arm the team as it creates more convenient, in the first round in the match against you, the clubs of your bow still move now. So opt for the same tactic. And I see that you also play with the same or I am wrong?
2) What do you intend to put together the team and choose the players? If you want to play with the goalkeeper and striker archer forward.
I put the best that I have at disposal, not what you want ....
3) And first I saw the statistics and now with more time I just saw the game. The truth is I do not know what domain speaks to me or what he saw (it seems to me that it is only guided by the statistics), it was a party within all even. His plays were blows of head that went to thousands of meters of the stick and ah had just like us 1 play on the sticks. We generated and in his area his defenders managed to save him before our forwards kicked. Watch the minute 81 and 82 in it there are 2 clear plays of goal in our favor. His goal was an abortion of nature, for errors in which our defenders seem to step on the cords and can not refuse.
PS: I hope you will advise me for the next games. What do you think if I go out to play with an under 18 team ?? Fandiño is good 9 you think ??
PD 2: Take care of your selected who is doing well. regards
I cannot answer in Spanish so I will answer only in English.
its obvious that in ALL your matches you play with a left winger and your weak defence line is at the right. its more than obvious that my best defender will play as right wingback and I will also select a left winger. if you can also check I use various formations and not the same all the time. your formation is easy to be predicted.
not only you select the same formation but you also select the same players in the same positions and without making any subs. quite easily to be predicted as well.
so its not the selection I want. its the matter that you should be happy with the today's result with all the totally predictable formation you have. after all and I dont know if you know it at all;sokker is a matter of tactics. not having the same players with the same formation just because I think they are the best.
lets talk about the match.
I have already admitted that in minute 70-80 you had some opportunities. you also say that my goal should not be existed and all my shots were out of target.
let me tell you my opinion about the game.
1. I lost counting my shots that hit the post. 3-4-5? how many?
2. how many shots did I have on target and how many did you have?
3. you said you watched the match and that the result is unfair for you. watch the game again and tell me how many clear opportunities you have till 70 and how many I have. tell me what do you think about the possesion just by watching the game? does the number 55/45 show the reality or is just a fake number as well?
with your overall performance its a miracle that you have 9 points. and you should be very very thankful that you didnt lose today.
PS I cannot advise which tactics you should follow for next mathes or which players to use. scout your next opponent and try to hit his weaknesses. its obvious that you should not use the same formation all the time. whoever does so and gets nice results is because of luck not because of clever decisions.
its obvious that in ALL your matches you play with a left winger and your weak defence line is at the right. its more than obvious that my best defender will play as right wingback and I will also select a left winger. if you can also check I use various formations and not the same all the time. your formation is easy to be predicted.
not only you select the same formation but you also select the same players in the same positions and without making any subs. quite easily to be predicted as well.
so its not the selection I want. its the matter that you should be happy with the today's result with all the totally predictable formation you have. after all and I dont know if you know it at all;sokker is a matter of tactics. not having the same players with the same formation just because I think they are the best.
lets talk about the match.
I have already admitted that in minute 70-80 you had some opportunities. you also say that my goal should not be existed and all my shots were out of target.
let me tell you my opinion about the game.
1. I lost counting my shots that hit the post. 3-4-5? how many?
2. how many shots did I have on target and how many did you have?
3. you said you watched the match and that the result is unfair for you. watch the game again and tell me how many clear opportunities you have till 70 and how many I have. tell me what do you think about the possesion just by watching the game? does the number 55/45 show the reality or is just a fake number as well?
with your overall performance its a miracle that you have 9 points. and you should be very very thankful that you didnt lose today.
PS I cannot advise which tactics you should follow for next mathes or which players to use. scout your next opponent and try to hit his weaknesses. its obvious that you should not use the same formation all the time. whoever does so and gets nice results is because of luck not because of clever decisions.