Azərbaycan dili Bahasa Indonesia Bosanski Català Čeština Dansk Deutsch Eesti English Español Français Galego Hrvatski Italiano Latviešu Lietuvių Magyar Malti Mакедонски Nederlands Norsk Polski Português Português BR Românã Slovenčina Srpski Suomi Svenska Tiếng Việt Türkçe Ελληνικά Български Русский Українська Հայերեն ქართული ენა 中文
Subpage under development, new version coming soon!

Subject: form & keepers

  • 1
2009-03-21 12:17:40
I've got an excellent keeper in tragic form & a solid keeper in magical... who would you play?

cheers!
2009-03-21 12:18:46
Depends on their pace/passing too!
2009-03-21 12:22:44
assuming all other stats were equal ;-)
2009-03-21 12:26:20
go with the form guy
2009-03-21 12:59:44
damn.. does form really span 2 skill levels? boo.....

thanks for the advice.
2009-03-21 13:17:17
close at that level really - the excellent might be better

if form causes a percentage drop in ability then I would fully expect it to cause a 2 level drop on a divine, but I'm not so sure about an excellent I admit
2009-03-21 13:30:01
Solid keeper for me. The form could effect passing as well (possibly pace??), so would go with form.
2009-03-21 13:33:10
Its the same Vancian; and I base this directly on my experience with and excellent keepr (with passing poor,defending poor,technqiue poor, pace poor, playmaking poor) who was tragic form performed only 7%.

While my sub keeper on solid form performed 37%. His skill set is below:
Steven Arrow, age: 20
club: FC Jundullah, country: England
value: 71 550 £, wage: 915 £
solid form, hopeless tactical discipline

tragic stamina solid keeper
solid pace tragic defender
hopeless technique tragic playmaker
good passing hopeless striker

So I would say go with the solid guy for sure based directly on experience with the same problem.
2009-03-21 13:34:38
Keeper ratings are misleading in matches where the opposition has very few attacks - their rating in these cases is a fraction of its potential; and in some cases they will not get a rating at all if they barely touch the ball. I haven't looked at the match here to see what the def % is, but be aware it may apply.
2009-03-21 13:35:11
Just looked at the match. I think you right jim.
2009-03-21 14:12:25
I see Jim. I did not know that. Thanks man.
2009-03-21 15:06:57
by the match you meant my match?
2009-03-21 23:18:06
Yep.

They only had 3 shots so didn't really trouble your keeper enough to give him a proper rating.
2009-03-22 09:08:39
ahh I see.. Thanks Mr. Goat :D
2009-03-22 09:28:47
cheers all!
  • 1