Subpage under development, new version coming soon!
Topic closed!!!
Subject: [VOT] Electorale - intrebari
Would you do your best for Romania even if you play against your brazilian fellows ?
Of course! Win is win, no matter whats the country, i want to win all countries possible!
Of course! Win is win, no matter whats the country, i want to win all countries possible!
Woody you have no chance in romania, you lose your time
it's not an aggressive message but friendly..the votes are for friends, and people don't know you
it's not an aggressive message but friendly..the votes are for friends, and people don't know you
No need to explain with tactics to me, I'm very noob at this topic.
In our community is a guy called doru and he claim that 3-5-2 tactics it's the best choice for Romania U21 :)
Are you agree with him ? :D
Well.... When I was coach in Brazil, the biggest problem in the team was defenders and I was also looking for something I could do Jairzinho becoming a 'goal machine'! So one of the tests was a '3-3-3-1'
vs Sweeden
vs Uruguay
vs Lithuania (U21WC)
3 defenders, 3 def midfielders, 1 MC ,2 side mids and 1 striker! At the time with a fast striker as Jairzinho, and more midfields to create more chances is not a bad tactic, but have our problems, its defensive protection on the sides was the def midfielders because the 3 defenders if they leave the center, they will leave a very large space! and if you lose your MC like i lose with a red card in 1st U21WC match is a nightmare! I think with the options that Romania must possess not think it necessary to risk so much with something like this! I can understand the idea! 5 mids created the oportunities for the 2 strikers, but you can do this in several ways, using a 442! I do not think it is necessary to risk leaving our defensive sector with much space in the sides!
In our community is a guy called doru and he claim that 3-5-2 tactics it's the best choice for Romania U21 :)
Are you agree with him ? :D
Well.... When I was coach in Brazil, the biggest problem in the team was defenders and I was also looking for something I could do Jairzinho becoming a 'goal machine'! So one of the tests was a '3-3-3-1'
vs Sweeden
vs Uruguay
vs Lithuania (U21WC)
3 defenders, 3 def midfielders, 1 MC ,2 side mids and 1 striker! At the time with a fast striker as Jairzinho, and more midfields to create more chances is not a bad tactic, but have our problems, its defensive protection on the sides was the def midfielders because the 3 defenders if they leave the center, they will leave a very large space! and if you lose your MC like i lose with a red card in 1st U21WC match is a nightmare! I think with the options that Romania must possess not think it necessary to risk so much with something like this! I can understand the idea! 5 mids created the oportunities for the 2 strikers, but you can do this in several ways, using a 442! I do not think it is necessary to risk leaving our defensive sector with much space in the sides!
Woody, in acest sezon s-a jucat un meci Romania U20 vs Brazilia U20... ai vazut meciul? ce parere ai despre acest meci?... despre tacticile folosite de cele doua echipe?...
P.S. scuza-ma, dar pe forumul romanesc eu scriu numai in limba romana... inclusiv acest lucru e un test pentru tine...
P.S. scuza-ma, dar pe forumul romanesc eu scriu numai in limba romana... inclusiv acest lucru e un test pentru tine...
No problem, it is normal you write in your language because this here is a Romanian forum! :)
Well ... i watch this match! And to be honest Romania I would just lose that match by bad luck if it occurs! Because... that brazilian tactic... ahhhhhhhhhh... HORRIBLE! This is one reason I do not support the current coach! The midfield is non existent, it positioned really bad! The defense is only positioned in in the centre! leaves them very open the sides! And the strikers very distant in the area! This works against Romania in the WCQ because Brazil have top strikers, but in the U20 match, the Brazilian strikers is not much good in skills!
România He made a good match with the tactic he used (only 3 defenders), The Brazil played entirely in the defense area, They have plenty of space to Romania and only 2 poor strikers They would not make way against the defense of Romania!
Well ... i watch this match! And to be honest Romania I would just lose that match by bad luck if it occurs! Because... that brazilian tactic... ahhhhhhhhhh... HORRIBLE! This is one reason I do not support the current coach! The midfield is non existent, it positioned really bad! The defense is only positioned in in the centre! leaves them very open the sides! And the strikers very distant in the area! This works against Romania in the WCQ because Brazil have top strikers, but in the U20 match, the Brazilian strikers is not much good in skills!
România He made a good match with the tactic he used (only 3 defenders), The Brazil played entirely in the defense area, They have plenty of space to Romania and only 2 poor strikers They would not make way against the defense of Romania!
If I was the coach of Brazil, I would play more aggressively to try to prevent plenty of space for the Romanian team! Brazil does not have a good winger, had it would be a good option to test romania defense!
(edited)
(edited)
Multa lume considera ca nu mai este de actualitate sa joci cu extrema...
It depends! If you have good options to risk it, is not bad!
Let's use Switzerland for example in this U21WC!
I used a defense creating offside lines, but it has its risk, and if the opponent get to neutralize this?
Of course I'll have big problems! I do not think wrong a conservative style tactically, but...! It has times when a style so can be harmful too!
The second U21WC that Romania win I saw it! Tactics the defense closer to his keeper! Almost all teams have used it!
And this U21WC final i used the opposite!
There are two different ways of positioning, but at that time it worked!
So I do not think that there is an absolute truth! It all depends on the opponent we face! :)
Let's use Switzerland for example in this U21WC!
I used a defense creating offside lines, but it has its risk, and if the opponent get to neutralize this?
Of course I'll have big problems! I do not think wrong a conservative style tactically, but...! It has times when a style so can be harmful too!
The second U21WC that Romania win I saw it! Tactics the defense closer to his keeper! Almost all teams have used it!
And this U21WC final i used the opposite!
There are two different ways of positioning, but at that time it worked!
So I do not think that there is an absolute truth! It all depends on the opponent we face! :)
nu e vorba de curaj important e ca in lotul nat sa fie 3 jucatori care sa arate minim asa
formidable [11] stamina tragic [0] keeper
incredible [13] pace formidable [11] defender
formidable [11] technique formidable [11] playmaker
formidable [11] passing poor [3] striker
si in conditiile astea poti juca lejer cu 3 fundasi si pe flancuri sa fie mij de genu
deci cu siguranta merge jucat cu 3 fundasi si as juca 352 ...
formidable [11] stamina tragic [0] keeper
incredible [13] pace formidable [11] defender
formidable [11] technique formidable [11] playmaker
formidable [11] passing poor [3] striker
si in conditiile astea poti juca lejer cu 3 fundasi si pe flancuri sa fie mij de genu
deci cu siguranta merge jucat cu 3 fundasi si as juca 352 ...
Imi place ca te-ai gandit sa specifici 11 la stamina, lucru extrem de important :)
Tu si cristidinu veniti cu importanta rezistentei la U21.Hai sa lamurim atunci:tu doresti ca echipa sa fie antrenata pe rezistenta in dauna unor skiluri principale?
Si inca una:Din ce motive ceri autorizarea folosirii jucatorilor la nationala din partea managerii lor?
In viziunea mea, tu, ca selectioner decizi sa iei pustanul in nationala sau nu.Altfel arati ca un selectioner slab, fara decizii, fara cuvinte si vointa proprie.Urmeaza sa si folosesti tacticile facute de altii...si pierzi total controlul asupra echipei.
(edited)
Si inca una:Din ce motive ceri autorizarea folosirii jucatorilor la nationala din partea managerii lor?
In viziunea mea, tu, ca selectioner decizi sa iei pustanul in nationala sau nu.Altfel arati ca un selectioner slab, fara decizii, fara cuvinte si vointa proprie.Urmeaza sa si folosesti tacticile facute de altii...si pierzi total controlul asupra echipei.
(edited)
Si o intrebare si pentru tine, asa de inceput...asa sa reinviem atmosfera electoralelor de anii trecuti:
Deci scrii asa la discursuri:
"Romania U21 este (probabil) cea mai puternica nationala la nivelul U21, tinand cont de locul din clasament si rezultatele de la ultimele campionate mondiale!!! daca voi fi ales, voi incerca sa mentin echipa la acelasi nivel"
Intrebarea mea este:te-ai uitat la ultimul mondial?
Deci scrii asa la discursuri:
"Romania U21 este (probabil) cea mai puternica nationala la nivelul U21, tinand cont de locul din clasament si rezultatele de la ultimele campionate mondiale!!! daca voi fi ales, voi incerca sa mentin echipa la acelasi nivel"
Intrebarea mea este:te-ai uitat la ultimul mondial?
problema ca nu citesti ...sau nu intelegi ce trebuie ...
doru a intrebat daca are cineva curajul sa joace 352 ...
raspunsul meu a fost clar (nu si pentru tine)
numai in anumite conditii as juca acel sistem ...doar daca as avea jucatori ...esemplul a fost ala ...
eu asa vad lucrurile ...un jucator in banda cu ordin de mij in sistem 352 fara rezistenta mare nu ai cum sa joci cu el ...
in discursul meu am spus clar ca rez mminim 7 ...si da cred ca la 90 min jucate un jucator ar trebui sa aibe minim 7 la rez ...
nu e vorba de selectioner slab sau tare e vrb de comunicare ...e vrb de respectul reciproc selectioner si omul care antreneaza
sa stii ca conteaza enorm sa vrb cu propietarii nu sa astepti update de la ei si sa zici sec ...multumesc sau ok ...
aici confunzi si tu si ceilalti care gandesc ca tine ...jucatorii nu sunt proprietatea stafului tehnic
sunt useri care antreneaza in jurul unui singur jucator sa fie la nat ...si se trezeste ca dupa ce antreneaza la indicatiile stafului joca 1-3 meciuri sau 2 meci amical ...motive o groaza forma rez altul mai bun ca al lui ...
ei atunci userul respectiv nu va mai antrena pentru nat ...
doru a intrebat daca are cineva curajul sa joace 352 ...
raspunsul meu a fost clar (nu si pentru tine)
numai in anumite conditii as juca acel sistem ...doar daca as avea jucatori ...esemplul a fost ala ...
eu asa vad lucrurile ...un jucator in banda cu ordin de mij in sistem 352 fara rezistenta mare nu ai cum sa joci cu el ...
in discursul meu am spus clar ca rez mminim 7 ...si da cred ca la 90 min jucate un jucator ar trebui sa aibe minim 7 la rez ...
nu e vorba de selectioner slab sau tare e vrb de comunicare ...e vrb de respectul reciproc selectioner si omul care antreneaza
sa stii ca conteaza enorm sa vrb cu propietarii nu sa astepti update de la ei si sa zici sec ...multumesc sau ok ...
aici confunzi si tu si ceilalti care gandesc ca tine ...jucatorii nu sunt proprietatea stafului tehnic
sunt useri care antreneaza in jurul unui singur jucator sa fie la nat ...si se trezeste ca dupa ce antreneaza la indicatiile stafului joca 1-3 meciuri sau 2 meci amical ...motive o groaza forma rez altul mai bun ca al lui ...
ei atunci userul respectiv nu va mai antrena pentru nat ...