Subpage under development, new version coming soon!
Subject: [NT] WC19 Qualification
tactic orders:
in defense, when I play 5 defs, regarding positions.. 2..3..4..5..6 ..I prefer to choose 3 or 5 to guard other def positions. I consider 2,4,6 most important position in that formation(*) - if I want to defend opponent wing by 5 defs. I choose 3 or 5 based on position of his strikers. this is better if you dont know, if he might suprise you with mirrored tactic.
Guarding by one of the half backs is also ok for me, but I would choose, which side is important and let the other not guarded, since you do not want to happend that your wing-defending def will go to the other side.
Both situation will also slightly cut numers of orders which I would leave for some situation in mid.
anyway, in your list, Popovický should be guarding 2 and Volek 6.
Midfield
I would go for change on wing between 65 and 80 minute. But this depends on how much will wing be running, but generaly I would prefer change on that position. Bříza is ok substitute for wing.
I would also consider Pindík, but I think regarding your plan Bříza is better in offense.
Attack
I second ostulc in leting Havíř make penalty kick. He also should be playing the whole match.
..there is possibility to substitute wing for Lačný as 3rd attacker in case of tactic change, which would be my preference probably, and at 75-80 Kareta for Skočdopole anyway, but it would require change in tactics (7 for 9)
as for change tactic check, I would go for 50' and 65-70'
75, always Kareta on position 10
75, wining by at least 2 goals, Lačný on position 11
75, wining by at least 2 goals, Bříza on position 9
50, losing by at least 1 goal, Lačný on position 7
65, drawing or losing, Lačný on position 7
50, losing by at least 1 goal, Change tactics for Additional tactic
65, drawing or losing, Change tactics for Additional tactic
How does it sounds to you?
anyway, good luck tomorrow :)
(*).. but I used to play those 3 defs close yeach other in bottom two positions, so absence of one of them is not so crucial. This migh be different in your tactic.. and not working well.
in defense, when I play 5 defs, regarding positions.. 2..3..4..5..6 ..I prefer to choose 3 or 5 to guard other def positions. I consider 2,4,6 most important position in that formation(*) - if I want to defend opponent wing by 5 defs. I choose 3 or 5 based on position of his strikers. this is better if you dont know, if he might suprise you with mirrored tactic.
Guarding by one of the half backs is also ok for me, but I would choose, which side is important and let the other not guarded, since you do not want to happend that your wing-defending def will go to the other side.
Both situation will also slightly cut numers of orders which I would leave for some situation in mid.
anyway, in your list, Popovický should be guarding 2 and Volek 6.
Midfield
I would go for change on wing between 65 and 80 minute. But this depends on how much will wing be running, but generaly I would prefer change on that position. Bříza is ok substitute for wing.
I would also consider Pindík, but I think regarding your plan Bříza is better in offense.
Attack
I second ostulc in leting Havíř make penalty kick. He also should be playing the whole match.
..there is possibility to substitute wing for Lačný as 3rd attacker in case of tactic change, which would be my preference probably, and at 75-80 Kareta for Skočdopole anyway, but it would require change in tactics (7 for 9)
as for change tactic check, I would go for 50' and 65-70'
75, always Kareta on position 10
75, wining by at least 2 goals, Lačný on position 11
75, wining by at least 2 goals, Bříza on position 9
50, losing by at least 1 goal, Lačný on position 7
65, drawing or losing, Lačný on position 7
50, losing by at least 1 goal, Change tactics for Additional tactic
65, drawing or losing, Change tactics for Additional tactic
How does it sounds to you?
anyway, good luck tomorrow :)
(*).. but I used to play those 3 defs close yeach other in bottom two positions, so absence of one of them is not so crucial. This migh be different in your tactic.. and not working well.
Jste se vsichni nacamrali a hrali si na NT kouce? :D ;p
Congrats, but next time I would put there Voskovec instead of Exner.... Exner has low def skills
14 forma + 16 def a 17 forma + 15 def vyjde cca nastejno. A tu přihrávku na první gól by Voskovec určitě nedal, břídil. :P
prosímtě, když jsem koukal na ty exnerovy přihrávky obráncům soupeře namísto naším útočníkům
congratz to victory! what a substitutions, Bříza still got it :)
Thanks for help with conditions i changed them last min . Was quite busy friday so ostulc thanks to you as well. Need to watch the game again but second tactics crush them we have enough chances but expected more from defs. Lietva got the best wing in sokker glad we won and we have room to improve. I would ask all that training mids to add them more PM. Need more mids with 17 18 playmaking. Changing 7 with striker was good sub i think.
A když ho v neděli nasadíš s pokynem MID, můžeš využít bonus trénink v technice. :D
(edited)
(edited)
Yep different thing with that game is shots on goal today we have clear advantage on this and we have one incredible miss similar to ostuc had in CL. Hope next game with less turn overs probably will do some changes in line up
I will replay few things here for conditional orders.
I used the topic here with clear idea i did mistakes in first draft but was sure my team will point them and fix them.
Few things if you cover def red card with mid that mid needs to have at least 16 def obviously in my line up i did not have such
if you see my past games i always cover def with mid ...
This time i expected wing and usually if wing back gets red card i prefer to swap the empty wingback on his place.
My vision is if non suitable player plays on position with wrong orders chances for injuries are high so that is why i picked form reserves strikers Kareta to play with mid orders.
After i watching the game second time i would say we dominated the game and result is fair. Yes we were loosing 2:0 and if i have enough slots i would swap the second tactics early but i preferred to wait and not play defence mid as striker.
Mistakes i see are our mids were bit passive and were not tackling opponent strikers were more often in offside position not sure if it was tactics or their TD but i could work on that.
Maybe i did mistakes in line up but overall i picked the right players.
Next game is against Norway we need a win so we can breath well and concentrate on training and preparation on younger generation. Norway also likes to play 5-3-2W
based on that i think we need 5 def tactics as well i will check for better defensive mid in form if we have but possibly i could start with 5-3-2
yes 5-2-3 is powerful but starting with 3 strikers condition do not allows for swapping to proper tactics later
I used the topic here with clear idea i did mistakes in first draft but was sure my team will point them and fix them.
Few things if you cover def red card with mid that mid needs to have at least 16 def obviously in my line up i did not have such
if you see my past games i always cover def with mid ...
This time i expected wing and usually if wing back gets red card i prefer to swap the empty wingback on his place.
My vision is if non suitable player plays on position with wrong orders chances for injuries are high so that is why i picked form reserves strikers Kareta to play with mid orders.
After i watching the game second time i would say we dominated the game and result is fair. Yes we were loosing 2:0 and if i have enough slots i would swap the second tactics early but i preferred to wait and not play defence mid as striker.
Mistakes i see are our mids were bit passive and were not tackling opponent strikers were more often in offside position not sure if it was tactics or their TD but i could work on that.
Maybe i did mistakes in line up but overall i picked the right players.
Next game is against Norway we need a win so we can breath well and concentrate on training and preparation on younger generation. Norway also likes to play 5-3-2W
based on that i think we need 5 def tactics as well i will check for better defensive mid in form if we have but possibly i could start with 5-3-2
yes 5-2-3 is powerful but starting with 3 strikers condition do not allows for swapping to proper tactics later