Azərbaycan dili Bahasa Indonesia Bosanski Català Čeština Dansk Deutsch Eesti English Español Français Galego Hrvatski Italiano Latviešu Lietuvių Magyar Malti Mакедонски Nederlands Norsk Polski Português Português BR Românã Slovenčina Srpski Suomi Svenska Tiếng Việt Türkçe Ελληνικά Български Русский Українська Հայերեն ქართული ენა 中文
Subpage under development, new version coming soon!

Subject: »[NT] Suomi_majesty

2017-05-29 01:33:41
Hello friends.;
We had to win this week. I played effective. But we did not win. We have to win a definite week next week. And we have to score at least 4 goals. We will play for it a 4312 tactic. The backup tactic will be 4222.
2017-06-03 12:29:09
Tuli ja meni, mutta voitto tuli.
2017-06-03 13:03:10
We are through, congrats! Was a close call, but luckily Greece won 2-3 and Bosnia is out.
2017-06-03 20:14:08
We had to win differently. And won different. I hope we will be more successful.

2017-06-03 22:49:58
Good win and we get to next round. :)
2017-06-04 13:12:15
Thank you
2017-06-04 13:13:57
SUOMI - Italy

Our next opponent is Italy. Would you please comment. And I want to hear your advice.





2017-06-04 14:31:39
Thank you
2017-06-05 09:04:21
Just look how Romania destroyed them a few weeks ago. They have two attackers who play very high up but only two central midfielders. I would use something similar you used in the last game, but lower the defense and the midfield and but our attackers higher. I hope you understand what I mean.. 4312 with a low defense, rather low midfield and winger and attackers quite high. Why I would use this? Well, let me tell you.

- Italia's attackers are high but it's too risky to try to use high defense line against them. Every time they are not in offside position they will be 1 on 1 against our keeper.

- Four defenders close to each other would be my option. They might use a winger but most probably won't. A tight line is better not to leave spaces for through passes and to have enough players to tackle their attackers.

- I would not use 5 defenders, because if they don't have a winger, the wingbacks are useless + we would only have 3 defenders in the middle against their attackers. 4 vs. 2 is better than 3 vs. 2.

- 3 central midfielders to ensure we have enough ball possession in the game.

- A rather low winger if they use a high defensive line (I guess they'll use low line). That way our midfielders can pass the ball to the winger if the strikers are in offside.

- Low winger is also good if they have a low defensive line. He has lots of space and can pass the ball to the attackers before the defender comes to steal the ball.

- High attackers is a must for us. If they use a low defensive line, it's not good that our strikers are too low. They will run towards the defenders, which is like banging our heads to a wall. High strikers might cause some offsides, but will give us a few 1 on 1s for sure during the game.

These are my thoughts.. :)
2017-06-05 11:49:53
But our attackers higher...Karsten means butt because he likes butts.
2017-06-05 12:44:45
thePersten
2017-06-05 13:05:53
It's Soinivaara who likes to get high and lick butts. Leave Saarensivu out of this!
2017-06-05 15:35:12
thePerstenille huutonaurut!
2017-06-08 17:08:17
Thank you for your comments. I watched the match in romania. If it was a normal match. I could have used similar tactics. But this match is very important. So I do not want to take any risk. 5 defensive players think 2 ortsaha 1 wing and 2 goal scorer.

But our substitute team will have 4 close defense, 3 midfield,1 wings and 2 goal scorers. If 2nd opponent is superior, we will play with spare tactics.

2017-06-10 11:37:35
So close.. Italy had more chances but we could've won also. Stupid Saarensivu with a missed penalty in the first half. To lose on the penalties always sucks but we are kinda used to it.
2017-06-10 12:01:57
We had a very good fight. But we lost the penalty. This is so sad. I am very sad....