Subpage under development, new version coming soon!
Topic closed!!!
Subject: Eesti rahvuskoondis managed by Jurkasz
Ill give it 15 minutes more. Then I`ll let vilpu phone greg.
Just received from greg..
Message from: greg
Date of posting: 2009-12-19 12:14
Subject: I am sorry
Dude I am sorry, we have some problems ....But don`t worry I am going to make it up to you. From now on your players are going to develop twice as fast compared to others and Sokk is going to get a 50 day injury today as you wished earlier.
Message from: greg
Date of posting: 2009-12-19 12:14
Subject: I am sorry
Dude I am sorry, we have some problems ....But don`t worry I am going to make it up to you. From now on your players are going to develop twice as fast compared to others and Sokk is going to get a 50 day injury today as you wished earlier.
Vilpu - Davy
Just received from greg..
Message from: greg
Date of posting: 2009-12-19 12:14
Subject: I am sorry
Dude I am sorry, we have some problems ....But don`t worry I am going to make it up to you. From now on your players are going to develop twice as fast compared to others and Sokk is going to get a 50 day injury today as you wished earlier.
Damn, cant argue with that...
from vilpufacts nr 4.:
4. Vilpu is not Politically Correct. He is just Correct. Always.
(edited)
Just received from greg..
Message from: greg
Date of posting: 2009-12-19 12:14
Subject: I am sorry
Dude I am sorry, we have some problems ....But don`t worry I am going to make it up to you. From now on your players are going to develop twice as fast compared to others and Sokk is going to get a 50 day injury today as you wished earlier.
Damn, cant argue with that...
from vilpufacts nr 4.:
4. Vilpu is not Politically Correct. He is just Correct. Always.
(edited)
Ups, my inner Sherlock was wrong. Kangro was playing pokker not Sokker. And Sokk, with his 132 cm height, h e a d e d a goal. There's a weird (women's logic) in Sokker!
:)
:)
Grrr...Treier as a DEF order, you ruined my training plans for this week - at least it feels like that:)
That was quite good and thrilling game. Man,I wanted to see the penalties:)
(I bet that Vilpu wanted the same thing - to see how Sokk fails:D)
Anyway, Sokk headed a goal:o. But missed some good shots also. Riiman made a great game:=)
(edited)
(I bet that Vilpu wanted the same thing - to see how Sokk fails:D)
Anyway, Sokk headed a goal:o. But missed some good shots also. Riiman made a great game:=)
(edited)
Secondly tactic wasnt that good: There are extreme circumstaces where 3 strikers are appropriate, this match wasnt one of them. I`m sure you were certain that they are coming with 5 defenders and a weak midfield, the correct move for that isnt putting one extra striker but the correct move is not to use wingers and make a midfield-heavy oriented tactic.
if you play with only 2 midfieders they dont have room to pass between them and they always pass it to striker althought it would be way more effective when they would pass it to another midfielder who maybe has a look for throughou(whats that word) pass. Secondly they get to the ball faster. Thridly opponent defenders and midfielders have less passing coridors.
the correct formation for that game would have been 5-3-2 or even better 5-4-1 with no winger and defenders high as they were today. basically bluep`s mess of a tactic but a bit more freedom to our mids.
Since you had Hungary previous tactic which they used again today, then you should have moved our strikers 1 notch to their goal side, when the ball was in midfield or on our side.
There actually is a lot to learn for you from todays game, what was wrong I hope you are able to understand and see those leaks in todays tactic when youll rewatch the game.
(edited)
if you play with only 2 midfieders they dont have room to pass between them and they always pass it to striker althought it would be way more effective when they would pass it to another midfielder who maybe has a look for throughou(whats that word) pass. Secondly they get to the ball faster. Thridly opponent defenders and midfielders have less passing coridors.
the correct formation for that game would have been 5-3-2 or even better 5-4-1 with no winger and defenders high as they were today. basically bluep`s mess of a tactic but a bit more freedom to our mids.
Since you had Hungary previous tactic which they used again today, then you should have moved our strikers 1 notch to their goal side, when the ball was in midfield or on our side.
There actually is a lot to learn for you from todays game, what was wrong I hope you are able to understand and see those leaks in todays tactic when youll rewatch the game.
(edited)
(I bet that Vilpu wanted the same thing - to see how Sokk fails:D)
I didn`t watch the game ...
I didn`t watch the game ...
Vilpu ei vaata jah mänge. Mängud vaatavad Vilput.
Vaatasin kuidas mu uus taktika prantslaste vastu töötas. Madala kaitsega ei saa mängida ilma, et läbisööte ei tuleks. Samas ääre sai täitsa enam vähem kinni. Nokk kinni, saba lahti situatsioon.
Don't take the tactic entirely serious for this match, in normal circumstances I would have used a 5-3-2 just like you've suggested. My choice for 3 strikers was more like a tribute to an earlier match with the Nippon NT, when I was also playing against Magyarország. Back then it was a golden move. I knew it won't be so good today, but I decided to try it anyway, it's boring to always play with 5-3-2 especially when we're talking about friendlies :]
Since you had Hungary previous tactic which they used again today, then you should have moved our strikers 1 notch to their goal side, when the ball was in midfield or on our side.
It would be awesome if you would know what tactic your opponent is going to use :) I was expecting five defenders and a winger, but I didn't expect ufhcs to use the same tactic twice in a row, so I didn't expect such a low defensive line.
The things is that our U25 team managed to achieve a close result with a not optimal tactic against the best line-up of Magyarország. With a bit more luck with the long-shots we could even win this game. I think this is very promising regarding our WC-match against them.
Since you had Hungary previous tactic which they used again today, then you should have moved our strikers 1 notch to their goal side, when the ball was in midfield or on our side.
It would be awesome if you would know what tactic your opponent is going to use :) I was expecting five defenders and a winger, but I didn't expect ufhcs to use the same tactic twice in a row, so I didn't expect such a low defensive line.
The things is that our U25 team managed to achieve a close result with a not optimal tactic against the best line-up of Magyarország. With a bit more luck with the long-shots we could even win this game. I think this is very promising regarding our WC-match against them.