Subpage under development, new version coming soon!
Subject: »[POLL]Are you interested in tactics analysis ?
we can discuss our last match-nice topic to write about it:)
before match i knew PT will play the same tactic so i tried to cover their only winger with Belmonte...unfortunately with weak effect:/ they`re playing with many defenders so i knew it would be difficult to break through so i put our strikers bit higher and i think it was quite ok-Espinas and Tansiongco were on offsides only 2-3 times...
but it was still not enough to shot more than one goal:/
before match i knew PT will play the same tactic so i tried to cover their only winger with Belmonte...unfortunately with weak effect:/ they`re playing with many defenders so i knew it would be difficult to break through so i put our strikers bit higher and i think it was quite ok-Espinas and Tansiongco were on offsides only 2-3 times...
but it was still not enough to shot more than one goal:/
i put our strikers bit higher and i think it was quite ok
imo it was not high enough ;)
imo it was not high enough ;)
bad result but today our strikers didn't work very well :\
About the tactic i think strikers were too low when the ball was in our mid-field and that two players in front of our defense was a choice too much defensive against Prater Thai.Probably it would have been better if you'd choosen only one defensive mid and three offensive mid in support of two strikers and ready to break immediately opponents mids
About the tactic i think strikers were too low when the ball was in our mid-field and that two players in front of our defense was a choice too much defensive against Prater Thai.Probably it would have been better if you'd choosen only one defensive mid and three offensive mid in support of two strikers and ready to break immediately opponents mids
if you agree with me i'd have chosen as first match SAMF FC - Makati Red Robins,i think it could be interesting to see all togheter
sounds like a plan
sounds like a plan
i do agree. i'm sure Makati Red Robins has a new tactics to make sure they win this time. ;)
(edited)
(edited)
Premier League
----------------------------------------------------------
2. SAMF FC..................22.....7v....1n....3p....33-14
5. Makati Red Robins....19..... 6v....1n....4p....25-19
----------------------------------------------------------
Previous matches :
SAMF FC - Makati Red Robins 2:1 Date: 2009-09-13
----------------------------------------------------------
Makati Red Robins - SAMF FC 1:2
----------------------------------------------------------
Match review
Very balanced game guys:I think that fisrt red card was very important for the outcome of the match,even if SAMF FC today showed us a still more beatiful football.There were few goal chances but each of the three goal it was great.
Congratulations to both,tactics with their little errors are still good!
Votes of tactics
SAMF FC vote 7
Excellent disposition of defensive line,with 3def+3mid ever compact and well ordered,maybe a little bit too high.
Winger completely failed his work but with these skills it's normal:indeed in Sokker winger is a compicated role that requires at least 3\4 skill at high level.It's better to find other solutions.
Makati Red Robins vote 6
Three strikers are a gravity too big for those three midfielders:you can try to play with two defensive mids or at least you have to cut the distances in the middle of the field.Defense line is quite ok even if in some situations there's too much space between defenders.
----------------------------------------------------------
2. SAMF FC..................22.....7v....1n....3p....33-14
5. Makati Red Robins....19..... 6v....1n....4p....25-19
----------------------------------------------------------
Previous matches :
SAMF FC - Makati Red Robins 2:1 Date: 2009-09-13
----------------------------------------------------------
Makati Red Robins - SAMF FC 1:2
----------------------------------------------------------
Match review
Very balanced game guys:I think that fisrt red card was very important for the outcome of the match,even if SAMF FC today showed us a still more beatiful football.There were few goal chances but each of the three goal it was great.
Congratulations to both,tactics with their little errors are still good!
Votes of tactics
SAMF FC vote 7
Excellent disposition of defensive line,with 3def+3mid ever compact and well ordered,maybe a little bit too high.
Winger completely failed his work but with these skills it's normal:indeed in Sokker winger is a compicated role that requires at least 3\4 skill at high level.It's better to find other solutions.
Makati Red Robins vote 6
Three strikers are a gravity too big for those three midfielders:you can try to play with two defensive mids or at least you have to cut the distances in the middle of the field.Defense line is quite ok even if in some situations there's too much space between defenders.
Some tactical advices with pictures..
SAMF FC
Excellent disposition of the difensive line,with 3 mids ready to close every space.
It happened frequently that the goalkeeper made wrong throw-in cause winger was too far.In next image you can see one disposition to start better the action:it's important to cut the distances to see good passing.
Makati Red Robins
There too much space between the three midfielders.Here you can see that with two defensive mid the defense is quite covered and the "false-playmaker" a little bit higher ready to make pressing and useful to cut the distance with strikers
or you could retract two internal-mids and cut the distances between them
If you play with three strikers always close and tight,the work of opponent defenders will be only easier then usual.
It's better to try to take advantage of the width of the field:we have to try to go away from opponent defenders and then to go straight to the goal
In this picture we can see that strikers are too low,it's better put them more forward
SAMF FC
Excellent disposition of the difensive line,with 3 mids ready to close every space.
It happened frequently that the goalkeeper made wrong throw-in cause winger was too far.In next image you can see one disposition to start better the action:it's important to cut the distances to see good passing.
Makati Red Robins
There too much space between the three midfielders.Here you can see that with two defensive mid the defense is quite covered and the "false-playmaker" a little bit higher ready to make pressing and useful to cut the distance with strikers
or you could retract two internal-mids and cut the distances between them
If you play with three strikers always close and tight,the work of opponent defenders will be only easier then usual.
It's better to try to take advantage of the width of the field:we have to try to go away from opponent defenders and then to go straight to the goal
In this picture we can see that strikers are too low,it's better put them more forward
imo you should put the time sacrificed on that in the analyse your nt team, cause it's rly important.
This is great analysis. The red card was really big. The game turned at that point for me imo. Im taking all of your advises.
I wouldnt mind if you would do an analysis after i make changes and then we could see if there was an improvement.
I wouldnt mind if you would do an analysis after i make changes and then we could see if there was an improvement.
it's the 3rd time in this season that SAMF FC defeated Makati Red Robins with the same results (2-1).
both use the same tactics in the last two matches, i just don't know if the movements are the same coz i can't watch it :p
Winger completely failed his work
but for the record he's the equalizer
both use the same tactics in the last two matches, i just don't know if the movements are the same coz i can't watch it :p
Winger completely failed his work
but for the record he's the equalizer
imo you should put the time sacrificed on that in the analyse your nt team, cause it's rly important.
i'm not sure to understand you:would you like some analyse of NT'matches?i decided to analyse some match of pilipinas'users to try to improve their love for tactical'study,i'm not sure that nt matches are so interesting for them
but for the record he's the equalizer
what do you mean with "equalizer"? With Winger completely failed his work i mean that his companions made many wrong passings cause it was too far and too sideward,so i think it's better to try other solutions,with this level of skill.Also winger'cross,with passing'skill under very good\excellent,are not so special..
For example he could try to add one mid in the middle to make easier the difficult of the passings.
i'm not sure to understand you:would you like some analyse of NT'matches?i decided to analyse some match of pilipinas'users to try to improve their love for tactical'study,i'm not sure that nt matches are so interesting for them
but for the record he's the equalizer
what do you mean with "equalizer"? With Winger completely failed his work i mean that his companions made many wrong passings cause it was too far and too sideward,so i think it's better to try other solutions,with this level of skill.Also winger'cross,with passing'skill under very good\excellent,are not so special..
For example he could try to add one mid in the middle to make easier the difficult of the passings.
"equalizer" he scored for the 1-1. ;)
Also winger'cross,with passing'skill under very good\excellent,are not so special..
does it mean that its not really a good idea to have a winger with passing less than very good?
Also winger'cross,with passing'skill under very good\excellent,are not so special..
does it mean that its not really a good idea to have a winger with passing less than very good?
i really think that a winger to be a good player must have passing (and i'm flying down) at least 9\10 and playmaking more then 6.
Instead if we have players without these skill we can try tactics more compact,it's better one mid more then a winger who can't be so decisive
Instead if we have players without these skill we can try tactics more compact,it's better one mid more then a winger who can't be so decisive
imo you should put the time sacrificed on that in the analyse your nt team, cause it's rly important.
for me, having an effort like this has a macro effect for the NT.
it adds interest for the managers to stay in the game.
for me, having an effort like this has a macro effect for the NT.
it adds interest for the managers to stay in the game.
don't get me wrong, i just think it's not as important as managing the nt ;)
but if you have so much time, no problem for me at all.
@wiser - of course, but i still can see the same nicks showing on the forum, nothing more, nothing less.
if someone is willing to finish up with the game, he'll do it then without any hesitation ;)
but if you have so much time, no problem for me at all.
@wiser - of course, but i still can see the same nicks showing on the forum, nothing more, nothing less.
if someone is willing to finish up with the game, he'll do it then without any hesitation ;)
the same nicks showing doesn't mean other managers don't read the forum, it only implies that they got nothing more to say and just stay on the background.