Subpage under development, new version coming soon!
Subject: Results 3/11/10
Basically the same as me, just change around the role of the trainee and full strength squad, and the score to 12-0, and we're similar.
no because with a full strength squad i would of lost by less....not similar at all.
With three defenders against THAT team it wouldn't have been too different.
Attack isn't always the best form of defence and all that.
Attack isn't always the best form of defence and all that.
that's why I said, CHANGE THE ROLES, meaning we were the same, just I had the full strength squad and hbms didn't, and I lost by 12-0
I also think the result is my worst against a Welsh side, I'll check that up.
LP looking at his past friendlies i thought he would be playing his trainees so i played it, obviously he didn't believe me when i sent him a message saying i was playing my trainees :/
Worst loss to a Welsh side: 12-0 vs. handsome boy's modeling school (3rd November 2010)
2nd worst loss to a Welsh side: 11-0 vs. Ashburn FC (in 2009)
2nd worst loss to a Welsh side: 11-0 vs. Ashburn FC (in 2009)
What do you guys think of my new signing?
He's a bizzare cross of Ninja Turtle and Claude Makelele, he's my new CDM, Raphaël Makelele!
Raphaël Makelele , age 20
value: 96 000 £
wage: 1 335 £
tragic [0] form
solid [8] stamina unsatisfactory [2] keeper
formidable [11] pace excellent [10] defender
poor [3] technique formidable [11] playmaker
adequate [6] passing average [5] striker
Will need to fix his form soon but otherwise, he's very talented and I'm training tech :)
He's a bizzare cross of Ninja Turtle and Claude Makelele, he's my new CDM, Raphaël Makelele!
Raphaël Makelele , age 20
value: 96 000 £
wage: 1 335 £
tragic [0] form
solid [8] stamina unsatisfactory [2] keeper
formidable [11] pace excellent [10] defender
poor [3] technique formidable [11] playmaker
adequate [6] passing average [5] striker
Will need to fix his form soon but otherwise, he's very talented and I'm training tech :)
sounds more like a right back for Man U with a spelling error
i would not pay 350k for that for the followin points;
1) Bad Form
2) Poor Technique
3) He is 20 yrs old
1) Bad Form
2) Poor Technique
3) He is 20 yrs old
1) I think it's fixable, I have my theories on form.
2) He's a tech trainee for a reason. Also, his talent is great, so it will go up quickly.
3) Well nearly 21 but the point is there is huge profit to be made. A player like him with higher pace, a lot higher tech and higher passing in three seasons and profit is made :)
2) He's a tech trainee for a reason. Also, his talent is great, so it will go up quickly.
3) Well nearly 21 but the point is there is huge profit to be made. A player like him with higher pace, a lot higher tech and higher passing in three seasons and profit is made :)
i dont really think so,
1) form once tragic takes a good 2 seasons to get back up
2) tech is still bad either way, and as he gets older, the pops will slow down
3) Like a say, by the time he is profitable he will be probably 24 years old, probably wont make much profit at all
1) form once tragic takes a good 2 seasons to get back up
2) tech is still bad either way, and as he gets older, the pops will slow down
3) Like a say, by the time he is profitable he will be probably 24 years old, probably wont make much profit at all
1) I say it'll be done to incredible+ in a season if my theory is correct.
2) I know that, hence why I'll upgrade assistant coaches to neutralise that this season. Anyway, pops only slow down summat severe at 22.
3)
formidable tech tragic keeper
incredible/brilliant pace formidable defender
excellent tech outstanding playmaker
very good passing adequate striker
24yo, I think he'd go for at least double, at most a million.
2) I know that, hence why I'll upgrade assistant coaches to neutralise that this season. Anyway, pops only slow down summat severe at 22.
3)
formidable tech tragic keeper
incredible/brilliant pace formidable defender
excellent tech outstanding playmaker
very good passing adequate striker
24yo, I think he'd go for at least double, at most a million.
He's certainly more balanced than Coufal, but anyway, I'm happy and that's all that matters.
Two players of mine (Pietrzak and Ziarkowski) are being listed on friday evening, ones a double formidable defender with a fairly high sublevel of pace, the other a fairly decent defmid. If you wish me to list one earlier, then ask for skills and provide a decent price and I will.
Two players of mine (Pietrzak and Ziarkowski) are being listed on friday evening, ones a double formidable defender with a fairly high sublevel of pace, the other a fairly decent defmid. If you wish me to list one earlier, then ask for skills and provide a decent price and I will.