Subpage under development, new version coming soon!
Subject: [NT] Cymru
Reading the rules of the NT topics I saw that bumping my thread is not allowed if there isn`t any activity on it.
This is the rule from the "Elections General Discussions" thread:
Bumping your own thread is not allowed. I will bump every election thread after the first week and a few days before the end to make everyone’s election thread visible;
As a moderator in sokker I`m used of respecting the topics as any other user.
As I consider that this idea has nothing to do with my speech. In my speech I speak about my sokker activity and my plans for the Cymru NT.
I know you are the current NT manager, but don`t make my good intentions a propaganda activity.
(edited)
This is the rule from the "Elections General Discussions" thread:
Bumping your own thread is not allowed. I will bump every election thread after the first week and a few days before the end to make everyone’s election thread visible;
As a moderator in sokker I`m used of respecting the topics as any other user.
As I consider that this idea has nothing to do with my speech. In my speech I speak about my sokker activity and my plans for the Cymru NT.
I know you are the current NT manager, but don`t make my good intentions a propaganda activity.
(edited)
edditing your own speech is not bumping your own thread, because your are "editing", not adding a new post. Even, you can allways add something to your speech that you forgot before and adding that is not bumping it.
I agreed with some of your arguments, but in my opinion, offering what are you offering been a NT candidate "I" considere that as propaganda in the trying to collect more votes. I ask that to be fear enought to do it in your own thread by editing and not bumping it.
And I know that could be good intentions but looks like propaganda.
I agreed with some of your arguments, but in my opinion, offering what are you offering been a NT candidate "I" considere that as propaganda in the trying to collect more votes. I ask that to be fear enought to do it in your own thread by editing and not bumping it.
And I know that could be good intentions but looks like propaganda.
This idea has nothing to do with my speech. This idea is for making the national team activity more interactive for the community. If they don`t like it it`s no problem for me. I just wanted to know their opinion about it.
I don`t think the welsh community will vote for me just for proposing an interactive contest in case of winning the elections. I think they are smarter than that.
They will evaluate me on my skills and capability as a tactician and manager.
So let`s not underestimate them.
I won`t edit my own topic speech, but I can make another topic for this idea if you think this topic is not suitable. Is that better for you?
I don`t think the welsh community will vote for me just for proposing an interactive contest in case of winning the elections. I think they are smarter than that.
They will evaluate me on my skills and capability as a tactician and manager.
So let`s not underestimate them.
I won`t edit my own topic speech, but I can make another topic for this idea if you think this topic is not suitable. Is that better for you?
ok, first of all Im not understimate them, if that be the case I wont postulate here this season or even the last season. I respect them.
second, your offering plus contest if you win the elections just for "know" the idea of the community. I dont have nothing wrong with your idea, even I think is a good idea but offering something as candidate that you´ll implement in the case you win the elections and outside of your election speech it "clearly" a propaganda activity. If you want to see a feedback of the comunity of your idea you can add it to your election speech (edit is not a bump)because it something you "will do" in the case you win, right? at least you´ll implement also in the case you loose the elections, then I wont have any problem.
I´m not understimate no one with my argument, Im just explaining why I consider something not too much right.
second, your offering plus contest if you win the elections just for "know" the idea of the community. I dont have nothing wrong with your idea, even I think is a good idea but offering something as candidate that you´ll implement in the case you win the elections and outside of your election speech it "clearly" a propaganda activity. If you want to see a feedback of the comunity of your idea you can add it to your election speech (edit is not a bump)because it something you "will do" in the case you win, right? at least you´ll implement also in the case you loose the elections, then I wont have any problem.
I´m not understimate no one with my argument, Im just explaining why I consider something not too much right.
I respect them as well as any other community.
The idea with offering Plus for the winner comes with the fact that I used to organise these kind of competitions in my own leagues. When there wasn`t a price involved users forgot to post their own scores for the matches and the contest got boring.
When I proposed a Plus as an award no collegue of my forgot to place their bet.
So this is where the idea with Plus comes from.
I told you there is no propaganda involved in it. I wanted a feedback, that`s all. If they will say, hey mate this is a crappy idea, all would be the same for me.
Jagd_ve, in my topic speech I want to be asked about sokker questions not about this contest. It`s an idea which involves the NT, that`s why I posted it here.
Let`s stop here, our discussion it must be annoying for the welsh community.
I`m a reasoning man, I understand your point of view, but you are far from the truth.
(edited)
The idea with offering Plus for the winner comes with the fact that I used to organise these kind of competitions in my own leagues. When there wasn`t a price involved users forgot to post their own scores for the matches and the contest got boring.
When I proposed a Plus as an award no collegue of my forgot to place their bet.
So this is where the idea with Plus comes from.
I told you there is no propaganda involved in it. I wanted a feedback, that`s all. If they will say, hey mate this is a crappy idea, all would be the same for me.
Jagd_ve, in my topic speech I want to be asked about sokker questions not about this contest. It`s an idea which involves the NT, that`s why I posted it here.
Let`s stop here, our discussion it must be annoying for the welsh community.
I`m a reasoning man, I understand your point of view, but you are far from the truth.
(edited)
im not the owner of the truth, I just explaining my point of view.
It`s your point of view, I respect it, but it`s not nice to practically accuse me that I want to bribe the welsh community. This is what you are suggesting.
If this is what the welsh community got from my idea I would like them to tell me that and I will push the resign button in the next second.
If this is what the welsh community got from my idea I would like them to tell me that and I will push the resign button in the next second.
stop that, my complaine you have it now and my exponations are clear enought to understand it.
And I explained my intentions more than clear. I didn`t have any bad faith thoughts.
ok it´s fair enought then we can back to NT bussines
alternative team again to lower the risk of A-Team for qualifiers, Ireland will play alternative too.
The main goal is the WC campaign. Playing with the B team was a smart solution indeed as it is imperative to protect the "stars" from injuries.
I'm going to join the race for the U21 job in the next elections, school's too much of a draaaaag at the moment.
Good luck mate
About the Match, Ireland 3 Cymru 0. I´m a little dissapointed with Ireland´s coach didnt respect the pact we set about a full alternative squad.
My biggest concern in the squad is the defense. The bench defenders aren´t in quality level (bird + Madwick + Sadler) Perret and Tolley are too old with pace skill drops
The only youngs we have with clear future are Pug Hando and Ed Cole and I didnt lined up Cole in this match for the pace skill.
Aizewood will train in defense according to his new manager, he promise divine defense and Stephen Walker I had absolute no communication with the manager, he didnt reply any skmail.
The best we have in defense are Tompkins + Dugmore + Prothero + Shepherd + Coward with 33 years old. So with Aizewood are 6 quality defenders, that´s ok for some matches but is not enought to maintain Wales in the fight.
We need more Defense coaches.
Scott Hiller , age 22
value: 1 567 200 k Bs.
wage: 16 160 k Bs.
excellent stamina hopeless keeper
outstanding pace brilliant defender
weak technique solid playmaker
weak passing weak striker
Lloyd Barton , age 24
value: 1 990 400 k Bs.
wage: 23 440 k Bs.
solid stamina unsatisfactory keeper
incredible pace magical defender
solid technique weak playmaker
adequate passing weak striker
Cymru has players like this ones that can´t loose it. Those players should get better trained at that age. So if some home defender coach wants to repatriate them feel free to buy them and train them "like a boss" :p
About the Match, Ireland 3 Cymru 0. I´m a little dissapointed with Ireland´s coach didnt respect the pact we set about a full alternative squad.
My biggest concern in the squad is the defense. The bench defenders aren´t in quality level (bird + Madwick + Sadler) Perret and Tolley are too old with pace skill drops
The only youngs we have with clear future are Pug Hando and Ed Cole and I didnt lined up Cole in this match for the pace skill.
Aizewood will train in defense according to his new manager, he promise divine defense and Stephen Walker I had absolute no communication with the manager, he didnt reply any skmail.
The best we have in defense are Tompkins + Dugmore + Prothero + Shepherd + Coward with 33 years old. So with Aizewood are 6 quality defenders, that´s ok for some matches but is not enought to maintain Wales in the fight.
We need more Defense coaches.
Scott Hiller , age 22
value: 1 567 200 k Bs.
wage: 16 160 k Bs.
excellent stamina hopeless keeper
outstanding pace brilliant defender
weak technique solid playmaker
weak passing weak striker
Lloyd Barton , age 24
value: 1 990 400 k Bs.
wage: 23 440 k Bs.
solid stamina unsatisfactory keeper
incredible pace magical defender
solid technique weak playmaker
adequate passing weak striker
Cymru has players like this ones that can´t loose it. Those players should get better trained at that age. So if some home defender coach wants to repatriate them feel free to buy them and train them "like a boss" :p
When I'm knocked out of the Champ cup (read next week) I'm looking at a new project, i might well look to buy some Welsh defenders and train them up :)