Subject: »[accept] Protect NT players

inflation is ok but there should not be peak points in season that has main cause by bot reset...

Yep, thats why first week is just perfect, now we have prices peak point after sponsorship bonuses, so that will be a perfect time to balance it.

@juytt - finances - maybe so, need to be considered (i'm just a bit afraid about possible team trading).

team trading doesn't need inactive account, in other word : you dont have to wait for bots for trading team , its even counter intuitive to wait... i dont see more and less problems and fears introduce by inactive accounts with money (?)

Maybe right:)

hi. is it possible to remove teams that stayed several months in bankrupt? owners can't recover their teams and some teams can stay 9 months or more in this situation, without the possibility of protect NT players, for example this team https://sokker.org/team/teamID/91981

several months in bankrupt?

if im not wrong this is a "plus" user no? In that case, account is active until the end of "plus" that seem to be a fair trade ^^

i think if team goes in bankrupt and team has good players but owner did not have time or forgot to place them on market team should be saved by sending on market 1 or 2 players most likely NT players

yes, several months, the team I wrote was in bakrupt for 8 months and 3 weeks, almost 9 months.
thanks to the admin that removed it.
(edited)

never for "plus". That's not a fair trade to not keep a team for "plus" users. I juts say that in general, i dont know if this particular user is still "plus" since 8 month ^^

This week some teams were banned in Scotland and their players were saved. Some of them were never going to be suitable for NT.

The teams were banned for reasons that cannot be discussed on the forum.

I just want to point out that saving a player from a bot team and saving a banned team player is not equal.

Maybe for the future this could all be automatic, talking into consideration all factors why a player should be saved or not saved.

Why is that different?
Banned user have no profits from saving his players.

Thanks for answering.
https://sokker.org/forum_topic/ID_forum/1259/ID_topic/3443317/pg/11

Most players that are asked to be saved come from banned teams.

There are many forms of cheating. One way to cheat is to have a team, do illegal transfers, make money, do anything to strengthen your team, etc

Another way is farming. If one user is using other teams as farms, harvesting players. If you ban the farm team and save the harvest, the farmer loses the farm but not the harvest.

There are more ways to break the rules and sooner or later (I hope) Cheaters get banned.

I simply hope there is a more organised solution for players in bot teams and if it was up to me, I would not save banned players the way they were saved in some countries, including Wales, Ireland, Scotland.

Thanks again

(edited)

But there are no direct transfers in sokker, so i dont really get the problem - even if someone is farming players (you mean, to strenghten his team later, yes?) he need first to win bidding. With sokker open market idea, it's hard fo farm anyone, because at the end market will verify and you have minimal chances to get that player below his market value.

From game perspective, its much better to search for some kind of player on TL and try to find good price, than set a farming team to produce that particular type of player and buy him in few seasons.

We dont see any need to punish players for playing in banned teams.

up