Subject: »[idea] World Cup players limits

To give more emotion and realism, to reduce injustices, I suggest that the number of players participating in an edition of the NT or U21 World Cup should be limited to 23 as in real life. Where players are called up to go to the world tournament, and may even stay out of the club during this period. During the tournament it is forbidden to cast another player who is not on the World Cup list.

not sure is possible world cup is long in sokker with no control on the form and injuries is definitely -1 for me
(edited)

Most small countries do not use even the 23 players, for example: when one player is injured another is already returning from injury, since the injury is a maximum of 32 days.

Anyway, I could put an escape for the coach to summon someone from outside if I was unlucky to injure 12 players.

Im hearing all different suggestions all to help small countries lets make more youths etc lest have second team lets change rules of tournaments but why?
why we have to help any country if that will affect others ?
I think top nations will not be affected of all this suggestions but medium size countries yes
cause it still will be easy to small countries to beat closer rating to them but they will not be able to compete as top level as Romania lets say.
Behind every success of any NT team there is always hard work building and training players making sacrifices even creating big community... that should happen naturaly not with restrictions or limits.

Last WCQ is real example Andora most likely will be at the world cup with 4 active users ...
Danemark is at WC too...


(edited)

Most small countries do not use even the 23 players, for example: when one player is injured another is already returning from injury, since the injury is a maximum of 32 days.


Solution, see topic http://sokker.org/forum_topic/ID_forum/63355/ID_topic/3438798/pg/0#new

;)

yes, it is understandable that countries that have more users will be against this idea, but the fact of making the sokker more realistic, I like very much.

I now see that I didn't read your post correctly :)

But indeed, limit the number of players would make it more of a challange. But still, the large countries will bring 23 top players, that small countries don't have.

So first of all small countries should get more players (see link, now I can refure to the link :P) and something has to be done about the too many super divine players. There is also a topic made for that.

So I think it is a good idea, but it will take time before small(er) countries will benifit of this idea. Would take many seasons (if more is done instead of only reducing to 23 player).

Limiting yourself, creating a challenge, greatly reducing the difference. Large countries have, for example, in the range of 50 top players, so in a competition he will be able to use these 50, while small / medium countries having 10, that is, a 5 x 1 advantage (hypothetical).
With the implementation of this idea it would be 23 x 10 for top players, that is practically 2 x 1.

in game where training is based on slots cant have real life simulator we should stop pushing that idea game is good enough we are not on million other managers that exist cause we like it as it is mostly.
Most NT managers claim for more slots and you asking quite opposite. This will not be a favor to small countries will not help them much but contrary it will have huge favor to big countries cause they can put in line 23 superb players in form all the time and medium size countries will end up players in low form that will pray some how to rise their forum during tournament sorry definitely not good idea.

-1

with form system and too many top star players, it is bad payers limits...

+1

Taking into consideration many factors to carefully choose a player (skills of course, initial form, the quality of the owner team...) in term of UX it's really a better challenge to make a list that we can't change during a competition ! Currently we dont care about the future problems that could happens, we just sub.

But for sure, this User experience is very limited for small countries, they had not much choices in term of players... and this limits will not help small countries, quite the opposite in most case...