Subpage under development, new version coming soon!
Subject: [poll] lnegth of the sasson
please consider all aspect of the games NT fixtures
affect on training assume one training update per week
affect on training assume one training update per week
i do not like idea faster game... Lot of guy are 30-40 y with childrens and do not have time for faster game....
maybe remove rest weeks....
maybe remove rest weeks....
man .. read the text at least twice before you post it ...
anyway I voted for 15weeks. I could even imagine 14weeks season with qualification match on Wednesday but I would not want any shorter season.
anyway I voted for 15weeks. I could even imagine 14weeks season with qualification match on Wednesday but I would not want any shorter season.
i have 2 major concerns about having season 12 and less weeks NT WCQ groups will not fit in 12 week schedule i do not admire having 2 NT games per week all NT coaches that work will retire
second thing is new teams will have new players for 12 weeks they will not be able to make same quality players as existing so how we handle this
i will go for options 14 15 if we need to reduce major reduce i do not know lets other say
second thing is new teams will have new players for 12 weeks they will not be able to make same quality players as existing so how we handle this
i will go for options 14 15 if we need to reduce major reduce i do not know lets other say
I say double the speed.
Everything 2 times a week. 2 training updates, 2 league matches, etc.
Now, I don't want them to double the speed now.
First give us more options for smoother management. First squad auto-loading for league matches, second squad for cup and friendlies, auto-arranged friendlies vs bots, faster tactic making etc.
Everything 2 times a week. 2 training updates, 2 league matches, etc.
Now, I don't want them to double the speed now.
First give us more options for smoother management. First squad auto-loading for league matches, second squad for cup and friendlies, auto-arranged friendlies vs bots, faster tactic making etc.
+1 @sir_james
pls assume the solution one week training that is another story
(edited)
pls assume the solution one week training that is another story
(edited)
before any answer read again what devs want to do
in order to think about a real suggestion, and not just chat for fun...
Play to win – The current game mechanism is demotivating for players focused on results. We will propose some solutions to change that, giving extra motivations for winning, new official competitions to fight in. One of the biggest issues is, that club development is possible only by using a second match in the week for training. That lead us to some upgrades about the training system (but one training update per week on Thursday will not change). Our new idea is to avoid forcing managers to let all their players play for training.
Moderate game timing – Sokker is different than a lot of quick mobile games and we believe, that it’s a huge advantage. Our game needs patience and long term thinking, giving a chance to fit for different players. There is no huge difference between everyday players or those, who have much less time. But, few elements will be changed for sure – according to the fact, that the current length of a whole season is a barrier for new players.
Competition optimization – We want to address the issue of the extremely long season in Sokker (only 3 full seasons per year, which is demotivating for many new players) and also give managers a chance to join different kinds of tournaments. We will propose a new competition idea, with some small game acceleration, to make the season shorter, and to add a completely new Cup. We want to present our ideas for consultation in the upcoming weeks.
(edited)
in order to think about a real suggestion, and not just chat for fun...
Play to win – The current game mechanism is demotivating for players focused on results. We will propose some solutions to change that, giving extra motivations for winning, new official competitions to fight in. One of the biggest issues is, that club development is possible only by using a second match in the week for training. That lead us to some upgrades about the training system (but one training update per week on Thursday will not change). Our new idea is to avoid forcing managers to let all their players play for training.
Moderate game timing – Sokker is different than a lot of quick mobile games and we believe, that it’s a huge advantage. Our game needs patience and long term thinking, giving a chance to fit for different players. There is no huge difference between everyday players or those, who have much less time. But, few elements will be changed for sure – according to the fact, that the current length of a whole season is a barrier for new players.
Competition optimization – We want to address the issue of the extremely long season in Sokker (only 3 full seasons per year, which is demotivating for many new players) and also give managers a chance to join different kinds of tournaments. We will propose a new competition idea, with some small game acceleration, to make the season shorter, and to add a completely new Cup. We want to present our ideas for consultation in the upcoming weeks.
(edited)
I just saw the options and picked what I liked, and wrote what I would like.
Do I expect it to be the way I would like, not at all.
Do I expect it to be the way I would like, not at all.
with 12 weeks i do not see wcq groups with 7 teams how will work also by by copa america and eruro cup
The game can organize both, speed and/or long, players will have to choose their own tempo. All happy :)
i guess 12 week season would be to short for nt...or nt managers would have to get some money from sokker because that would be almost full time job with nt and club games :)
1, 2, 3 are good options for me...
1, 2, 3 are good options for me...
12 or 15 will never change the speed ? ^^ a little less "longer" for what? i dont understand this votes and sondage (15, 14, 13, 12 ? WTF)
We just need two votes : "keep it as it is" (+ sum of 15, 14, 13 votes...) Vs "less than 12".
I'm ok to "keep it as it is"... But when you are not competitive in a division, or if you ve got team(s) over-rating in our champ. division, season(s) could be boring un-challenging and for a very very long time :) That's (not only) a problem for new comers!
So my (better) vote is : BOTH OPTIONS. According to the Devs announcement it could be the road... good news.
We just need two votes : "keep it as it is" (+ sum of 15, 14, 13 votes...) Vs "less than 12".
I'm ok to "keep it as it is"... But when you are not competitive in a division, or if you ve got team(s) over-rating in our champ. division, season(s) could be boring un-challenging and for a very very long time :) That's (not only) a problem for new comers!
So my (better) vote is : BOTH OPTIONS. According to the Devs announcement it could be the road... good news.