Subject: [poll] lnegth of the sasson

Yes cricket management games. What is the difference? None!. All 4 games (2 soccer, 2 cricket) are 8 teams per league, and go for 16weeks for a reason.

Attempting to be rude like it somehow makes my point mute is idiotic.

The devs gave 3 TERRIBLE options, and moved the poll to an external link that we cannot see the results of, so they can say whatever they want at the end of it. If the poll was within sokker, then we could see what the actual result it.

But if they mess this up, and change to 12 weeks, who loses? Not us, we move to another game. They lose. They lose managers already signed up, they have less word of mouth so less managers joining, they have less managers in game so less plus, less managers in game means less clicks, which means less ad revenue.

Why do they want to increase the number of leagues? It's not to make the game better for everyone (well that isn't the primary reason). It is because when you sell ad space, you need to show number of unique log ins per day.
If there are more games, there are more unique log ins every day.

I have no issues them getting ad revenue, getting plus revenue or anything else, I do have problems when they try to change something the community doesn't even think is a problem, when there are pages and pages of ideas about things that are ACTUALLY problems.

If this game moves to 12 weeks, and they have games scattered between days from the same competition, or they increase it to 4 major matches per week, they will lose a lot of users, many of which are plus users. They will also have a lot of people who downgrade from plus to a free account.

I say what I say so the game is best for us, and is best for their bank statement. They deserve to be paid well, so they need to let us tell them how that can happen.

a less big step ? Because that's ridiculous ! Why changing 15 that's already work to move to 14 ? redefining calendars for just 1-2 less weeks ?

You answered yourself : 14-16 OR 12, and thats it !

There is no compromise! we can't shorten a season AND adding new competition, that's a non sense (not from the community , i admit). Why the hell adjusting less match/w to finally fall to 14w season (and not 15) : what a compromise ^^

You don't understand what I was writing.

And I think the answer is yes for the question redefining calendars for just 1-2 less weeks ? - because the whole idea came from the devs, not from the users, or better said, not from the majority of the users.

I really UNDERSTAND your cricket point, that's not stupid, my answer was just ironic : We are trying to find compromise and answers for questions that's doesnt exist !

Devs goal is to shorten a season. The answer is simple : YES or NO ! we dont need a cricket-like calendar proposal or whatever...

You don't understand what I was writing (...) the whole idea came from the devs, not from the users, or better said, not from the majority of the users.

YOU don't understand what I was writing ! ;-)

We get Devs goals and proposals (3 options + a NO option)... So we are waiting for results and devs feedback.
Clearly (if you need) if the idea was to pick proposals from a community Devs would NEVER launch their own proposals and own goals (diaries)...

Devs choose a direction, that's could be inspired by the community ok, but not driven by the community. That's the workflow.

So... SHORTEN the season : YES or NO.

Devs choose a direction, that's could be inspired by the community ok, but not driven by the community.

They said that they have proposals (and we can make our comments and modify proposals as well and they will listen to the majority of the users), not that they have already choosen direction. There is a huge difference.

as u want..........

Devs choose a direction, that's could be inspired by the community ok, but not driven by the community. That's the workflow.

I never see that community want more match/week, change training or reduc season at 12 weeks.. Community want improvements, not a big revolution. The actual system is good, it just needs improvements.

Community want mostly :

- reform Injury, form, supporter mood.
- Better Engine match, more realistic. (head to head, penalty etc)
- New Cup CC for more managers (CC + CC2)
- Better TL
- Help new manager
- Better prime
- Delete Bots
- More tactic choice.
- and improve what's around, stat, team space, etc etc

3 same options are completly different and similar, 0 debate, they impose their choice..They could have proposed all the possible choices to the vote, it was not complicated.
If they want testing a other composition created world 2 (like that some will have the 2nd team he requests ).


(edited)

That 's true... why more of matchs/week : it's ridiculous !!! pfff

I never see that community want ...

That's all your own points, not the "community" ones. In YOUR DREAMS ! :-)

Actually votes (that we call a "community") are 50% changing to 12w or less, 50% "keep it at it is".. Funny no ?

Keep it as it is is 16 week for me vote is 14-16 and 12 less so it's 30 to 70
But in context of so many new competitions we may expect now even longer season make sense ...

the votes don't make sense since there are not all possible proposals.
I didn't vote, and I must not be the only one.

I watch the subjects develop before.. it's not in my dreams.

(edited)

You should vote for me gives global idea is out of context of new changes but it's related about speed of the game of course staff can make better poll cause the one they give us is no better

Actually votes (that we call a "community") are 50% changing to 12w or less, 50% "keep it at it is".. Funny no ?

And what about 14 and 15 weeks?

69% of people don't want 12 week seasons.
31% want 12 weeks (the only option we have been given).

Over double the number of people don't want the option given to us

It's done, I especially hoped that the dev would do it. It should have been done before reducing it to just 3 options.
(edited)

i'm agree with you too, we can count : 13 + 14 + 15 + "keep at it is" votes.... I was saying this Firstly in this topic.

But i was just pointing the comment "community want" no season change : that's not true : around 28 % ask for "no change".
It's depend how you read the poll, but we can't say in one voice : the "community dont want" ...