Subpage under development, new version coming soon!
Subject: Hide tactics names from adversary!
- 1
- 2
I think tactics names should be hidden from adversaries because it makes it to easy for them to see what kind of system I play, if I name my tactics accordingly.
If my upcoming adversary studies my tactics for the last 3..4.. games he will immediately know what I will play against him just by looking at the name of my tactics, for example: 442, 351, 433 AM...etc.
A lot of smart people will say "don't name your tactics like that!".
Agree but if I have 100 tactics, all different, with different variations among them (433x3ATT , 433 AM, 433 Stopper, etc.) I can not name them 1,2,3,4 or A,B,C,D because at some point I will have no idea what it all means! On top of it the tactics are not sorted by name and/or numbers... it's all a big salad!
To make it even "better" there is nothing that could stop me from naming my tactic, for the upcoming game, some name that is denigrating to the adversary (f... you "name of team"!).
Cheers!
(edited)
If my upcoming adversary studies my tactics for the last 3..4.. games he will immediately know what I will play against him just by looking at the name of my tactics, for example: 442, 351, 433 AM...etc.
A lot of smart people will say "don't name your tactics like that!".
Agree but if I have 100 tactics, all different, with different variations among them (433x3ATT , 433 AM, 433 Stopper, etc.) I can not name them 1,2,3,4 or A,B,C,D because at some point I will have no idea what it all means! On top of it the tactics are not sorted by name and/or numbers... it's all a big salad!
To make it even "better" there is nothing that could stop me from naming my tactic, for the upcoming game, some name that is denigrating to the adversary (f... you "name of team"!).
Cheers!
(edited)
Devs can get a name and an alias. People can see the alias but not the name:
Example:
Name: 433x3ATT
Alias: WTF!
Example:
Name: 433x3ATT
Alias: WTF!
I think it's not important because you can see the match anyway. Also, with new 3d introduction we'll see tactical structure as in real life.
If that is a problem for you, use it in your favor!
For example, name 4-4-2 a 5-3-2 tactic, 3-5-2 to a 4-3-3... :P
For example, name 4-4-2 a 5-3-2 tactic, 3-5-2 to a 4-3-3... :P
Sokker has the option to hide tactic name. Just change the tactic at min 88
I have anyway developed a system of naming my tactics in such a way that they have coded names but I still know what they are, what kind of system it is.
Of course someone can watch your previous games and still have an idea about your system! The idea behind the topic was to make things a bit harder for the adversary, so they need to watch my previous games to see my tactics and also to have more intimacy, so if I want to name my tactics some weird name nobody else would see it! Plus ,as I said ,the possibility of naming one's tactic with obscene names would disappear or at least the others would not see it! Right now I could name my tactic "Fvgk sokker.org " and nobody could do anything about it! I could even say that I didn't new that it was public, there is nothing about the matter in the rules book!
But I think in the end is the lack of intimacy that bothers me the most!
The 88 min tip is cool, I might give it a try!
Have a nice weekend!
Of course someone can watch your previous games and still have an idea about your system! The idea behind the topic was to make things a bit harder for the adversary, so they need to watch my previous games to see my tactics and also to have more intimacy, so if I want to name my tactics some weird name nobody else would see it! Plus ,as I said ,the possibility of naming one's tactic with obscene names would disappear or at least the others would not see it! Right now I could name my tactic "Fvgk sokker.org " and nobody could do anything about it! I could even say that I didn't new that it was public, there is nothing about the matter in the rules book!
But I think in the end is the lack of intimacy that bothers me the most!
The 88 min tip is cool, I might give it a try!
Have a nice weekend!
Well...to be honest. I never take note of an opponent's tactic name, unless it's a funny name, like ''Angry mum!''
The users who like to uncover the secrets of a tactic will always look to your line-up, or even your match...
You can make or even remake a tactic so much that a 4-4-2 becomes a 5-2-3 f.e. or even a 5-5-0...so it's imo not a necessary feature.
If it will be implemented, it won't hurt, but not urgent at least...
So for me not a +1 or -1... it's a whatever's fine for me :-)
The users who like to uncover the secrets of a tactic will always look to your line-up, or even your match...
You can make or even remake a tactic so much that a 4-4-2 becomes a 5-2-3 f.e. or even a 5-5-0...so it's imo not a necessary feature.
If it will be implemented, it won't hurt, but not urgent at least...
So for me not a +1 or -1... it's a whatever's fine for me :-)
I think tactics names should be hidden from adversaries because it makes it to easy for them to see what kind of system I play, if I name my tactics accordingly.
Good idea. Absolutely no need for the opponent to see these names.
Good idea. Absolutely no need for the opponent to see these names.
Maybe it should be replaced by an automatic name calculated from the formation used: 5-3-2, 4-4-2, etc.
That would be writen in the match report by a journalist - he already writes the statistics and the text, so not much more effort for him to include the formation name
That would be writen in the match report by a journalist - he already writes the statistics and the text, so not much more effort for him to include the formation name
Indeed...based on the amount of DEF, MID and ATT order places on the pitch, the tactic form could be given.
Well I need to know what I played cause I always forget :) especially it has only 10 old line up to load and second one even don't save. Owner should see extended info with both real names of tactics of his team.
Off course...
I was talking about the view of the opponent...
I was talking about the view of the opponent...
- 1
- 2