Subpage under development, new version coming soon!
Subject: Gigantic future inflation
With the new ligue reform the sokker system will be invested with a huge amount of money, derived from 4 more games and 3 weeks without expenses and salaries, multiplied by all users of the game. At present, gigantic inflation is both predictable and inevitable. Have you (DEVs) thought of something to avoid this serious imbalance in the financial part of the game?
on the other hand, sponsors pay less with the new season as there are many weaker teams in higher leagues. People in Germany are already complaining. Maybe we should wait a bit how things will develop before we ask for concrete measures against inflation.
It is not the same order of magnitude. For example, my team will earn about two million more for their four home games and will save about one and a half million in salaries for three weeks less. It will take about a million fewer sponsors. Total expected, two and a half million more, in a budget of about 12 million, is +20%. It's a lot!
yes but with injueies and cards you will need double squad ...
Not necessarily.
You can choose just train with a youth team, no matter matches results.
Then you sale those players in millions.
in 3 seasons ANY team can get much higher than before if they do this.
You can choose just train with a youth team, no matter matches results.
Then you sale those players in millions.
in 3 seasons ANY team can get much higher than before if they do this.
It depends.... I think they said game will be a little more focused on results, so I might think they will punish harder seasons with bad performance.
Maybe you can go to lower division and your results will be good. :P
Maybe you can go to lower division and your results will be good. :P
My team is determined to train young players.
Merge the B with de C, just made more easy my decision to put MORE YOUNGER PLAYERS IN THE FIELD.
I´m 2nd in my actual legue, before i straggled for 5th place.
Thanks sokker.
: P
Merge the B with de C, just made more easy my decision to put MORE YOUNGER PLAYERS IN THE FIELD.
I´m 2nd in my actual legue, before i straggled for 5th place.
Thanks sokker.
: P
what about your weekly sponsor income? got punished? I heard some guys in Colombia had almost 50% reduction
Up!
Players are way too expensive. There is just too much money in the game, and more and more is given, week after week, season after season.
Players are way too expensive. There is just too much money in the game, and more and more is given, week after week, season after season.
And it wont stop. Players are going to be more and more expensive every week.
Players are too expensive because in this training system, there are far more managers interested in those players!
In the previous training system, managers needed to consider their current training and trainees with the player, and often the player was not a possible trainee because of those 2 criteria. Now, almost all players are potential trainees for all managers, provided they have the coin.
In the previous training system, managers needed to consider their current training and trainees with the player, and often the player was not a possible trainee because of those 2 criteria. Now, almost all players are potential trainees for all managers, provided they have the coin.
Offer and demand makes the prices get a balance and then it stays there
The problem is that the game is creating the double of money that is destroying since there are two league matches per week, and that happens every single week...
The problem is that the game is creating the double of money that is destroying since there are two league matches per week, and that happens every single week...
I honestly don't understand how it's "destroying" anything
If anything it's good for users
makes the game more fair among leagues/countries since sponsor money doesn't matter as much with higher possible transfer income/gain
makes the game easier for newer/smaller teams - they earn more from training -> still same coach/stadium improvement/salaries prices etc.
what's the difference whether a player is worth 5m or 10m? other than above mention capability to achieve more with fixed prices?
as for offer and demand, we are in a new situation so it can still take some time until it balances out...
a bigger problem, driving up the prices, is the fact that there are less and less users, with less and less decent youths so any half good youth goes for a good price...
(edited)
If anything it's good for users
makes the game more fair among leagues/countries since sponsor money doesn't matter as much with higher possible transfer income/gain
makes the game easier for newer/smaller teams - they earn more from training -> still same coach/stadium improvement/salaries prices etc.
what's the difference whether a player is worth 5m or 10m? other than above mention capability to achieve more with fixed prices?
as for offer and demand, we are in a new situation so it can still take some time until it balances out...
a bigger problem, driving up the prices, is the fact that there are less and less users, with less and less decent youths so any half good youth goes for a good price...
(edited)
Its not same for new/small teams. They get more money, but bigger teams are getting much, much more. Difference is too big, when new teams still starts with 250k€.
And it won't stop, its hard to calculate but after a few years you will buy players not for milions, but for billions. Imagine beeing new player then.
And it won't stop, its hard to calculate but after a few years you will buy players not for milions, but for billions. Imagine beeing new player then.