Azərbaycan dili Bahasa Indonesia Bosanski Català Čeština Dansk Deutsch Eesti English Español Français Galego Hrvatski Italiano Latviešu Lietuvių Magyar Malti Mакедонски Nederlands Norsk Polski Português Português BR Românã Slovenčina Srpski Suomi Svenska Tiếng Việt Türkçe Ελληνικά Български Русский Українська Հայերեն ქართული ენა 中文
Subpage under development, new version coming soon!

Subject: Gigantic future inflation

2022-11-23 16:02:39
According to the Oxford dictionnary a wild trader is "a sokker user buying players in the only purpose of selling them after 4 weeks with a profit, and this in a compulsive, frenetic and systematic way"

I checked carefully my list and you I don't see your name so I guess that means that you are allowed to keep playing sokker !
2022-11-23 16:41:01
Damien2a s2 D i e g o G.

Best sokker couple.
2022-11-24 12:36:42
Whether creating a retirement for players at age 37 or 38 would help decrease gambling money
2022-11-24 12:38:39
+1
2022-11-25 17:47:42
Force people with lots of money and good players to leave the game!!

Why? They are still the richest teams and can keep their good players, and because of that keep the best teams.

But when they need to buy new players, when owning 100M max 20M for just 1 player, is a fifth of the money. That is a large part, but maybe still a too small part.

So prices will most probably drop, training juniors becomes more important, and trading is only useful till the max amount of money. This is all what is best for the game. So I don't see the problem.

If managers want to leave because of that, no problem.
2022-11-25 20:28:32
You didn't quote my whole message, the most important part of my message is: /s
2022-11-25 20:47:31
You really want all the rich teams to suddenly start spending all their money on youths and other player investments and that will in Your opinion lower the inflation? Interesting take
2022-11-26 10:26:51
A player limit for players under 35 and a transfer limit of 15 players each season can do the trick.
2022-11-26 10:51:46
Some kind of progressively increasing sell tax based on amount of sells in timeframe x would be better than hard caps I think.
Would make extensive trading less profitable and would remove more money from the game which is the real problem.
2022-11-26 10:54:24
On a second thought, that would decrease the amount of cheap players on the market for new teams to buy so maybe not as good of an idea than I thought.
2022-11-26 12:45:44
You guys seriously think that creating overlapping limits is the answer to the problem? Such actions are never the answer to the core of the problem, they're just a bad attempt at taking care of the effects of the problem. Like using cough syrup when you have pneumonia.
2022-11-26 13:22:21
Good idea, my sister is currently sick with pneumonia, I'll tell her to get cough syrup! Thanks borkos :-)
2022-11-27 11:35:37
Ok, mister negative. Then please share all of us the real solution then. You're always the first to react when suggestions are bad, but I never see you give an actual solution...
You would be a great politician imo...
2022-11-27 13:43:52
+1
2022-11-27 15:33:27
Real solution is simple. Greatly cut income from tickets, for example by 40%. Or just from league matches by 50%, leaving cup and friendly matches without changes.
2022-11-27 15:42:45
Yes it is simple solution to reduce the only real reward you have for reaching the top divisions. This topic is a showcase of half-baked ideas