Subpage under development, new version coming soon!
Subject: [GD] Injuries
no sorry, my numbers are not more than a gut feeling. I don't have the time to digg for valid data.
My point was that changing the perspective of what is normal, will also determine whether you perceive the situation as lucky or unlucky.
My point was that changing the perspective of what is normal, will also determine whether you perceive the situation as lucky or unlucky.
statistical data could help to understand what is normal.
if anyone has it, please share. :-)
if anyone has it, please share. :-)
It was a figure of speech, but for real, you cannot take that proposal serious can you? Oh yes, let's bring death into the game! We need players to litterally drop dead on the field! Come on... it still is a game! It won't benefit with Christian Eriksen situations...that was already more cruel than anything I saw live before on a football pitch! And for the record...I closed that topic, I did not deleted it, so if the demand is really high for it, I can always re-open the topic, but...tbh, I doubt that if you do a survey, that more than 10% of managers will actually vote in favor of that.
"you cannot take that proposal serious can you? "
Oh yes, I can. My perspective comes from my experience with Sokker’s predecessor, Anstoss, as I mentioned before. It was a blast, believe me!
However, I see no need to reopen that topic now (thanks for the option anyway); I simply trust the devs.
----- Btw, my reminder:
The devs reacted 3 times in the past on the issue of injuries.
-1st time (2014): They changed the dribbling/injury algorithm. This shift increased the responsibility of managers regarding their tactics (excessive dribbling = higher injury risk).
-2nd time: When Raul emphasized multiple times the necessity of rotation.
-3rd time: They shortened the duration and lowered the probability of injuries by about 10-15%.
Bottom line:
If the next season evolves into a disaster, I am sure they will react. They are aware of all the arguments presented here.
What I miss most is a "reality check" from some managers; one might play with excessive dribbling, while another treats players like slaves, forcing them to play 3-4 times a week.
Oh yes, I can. My perspective comes from my experience with Sokker’s predecessor, Anstoss, as I mentioned before. It was a blast, believe me!
However, I see no need to reopen that topic now (thanks for the option anyway); I simply trust the devs.
----- Btw, my reminder:
The devs reacted 3 times in the past on the issue of injuries.
-1st time (2014): They changed the dribbling/injury algorithm. This shift increased the responsibility of managers regarding their tactics (excessive dribbling = higher injury risk).
-2nd time: When Raul emphasized multiple times the necessity of rotation.
-3rd time: They shortened the duration and lowered the probability of injuries by about 10-15%.
Bottom line:
If the next season evolves into a disaster, I am sure they will react. They are aware of all the arguments presented here.
What I miss most is a "reality check" from some managers; one might play with excessive dribbling, while another treats players like slaves, forcing them to play 3-4 times a week.
They won't react. They want to make wealthy teams poorer
Problem with a sokker recession is it impoverished the middle class, so to speak.
I'm already considering not trying in the ITC, just do corner friendlies.
Hell even the national cup is an option past a point. Play starting XI three times a week is eventually asking for it
Problem with a sokker recession is it impoverished the middle class, so to speak.
I'm already considering not trying in the ITC, just do corner friendlies.
Hell even the national cup is an option past a point. Play starting XI three times a week is eventually asking for it