Subpage under development, new version coming soon!
Subject: [info] Training issue - solutions
Average value comparison during qualifiers doesn't necessarily make sense because NTs use different teams. For example Poland decreased in value and dropped to 4th because we use like C-D level players in NT in most qualifying games now.
I can tell you by comparing current Polish NT players with previous generation of Polish NT players that the quality of TOP players dropped down. Not even one 5x 17 Polish player in the game and there won't be one in the upcoming seasons. Current generation of midfielders is worse than the previous one, the next generation will be even worse.
The value raise can be explained by the fact that it's very possible that the overall quality (sideskills) of defenders or average/medium level players improved due to 2x better general training, which was expected. Worse TOP stars, more good players.
I think that many NTs improved from ~76 max rating to 78-80, which would also suggest that's what happened, especially with rating highly impacted by secondaries (playmaker particularly).
feel free to decide for yourselves whether we desperately need an 11th or 12th training slot to save our precious pixels
what does it have to do with training best ~20 players in a country xD that can be done by 2 teams and NTs still play 1 game/week, not 4 games/week like clubs.
this argument is completely invalid, the slots are needed for clubs to train average players for the bench / rotation, not for NTs
(edited)
I can tell you by comparing current Polish NT players with previous generation of Polish NT players that the quality of TOP players dropped down. Not even one 5x 17 Polish player in the game and there won't be one in the upcoming seasons. Current generation of midfielders is worse than the previous one, the next generation will be even worse.
The value raise can be explained by the fact that it's very possible that the overall quality (sideskills) of defenders or average/medium level players improved due to 2x better general training, which was expected. Worse TOP stars, more good players.
I think that many NTs improved from ~76 max rating to 78-80, which would also suggest that's what happened, especially with rating highly impacted by secondaries (playmaker particularly).
feel free to decide for yourselves whether we desperately need an 11th or 12th training slot to save our precious pixels
what does it have to do with training best ~20 players in a country xD that can be done by 2 teams and NTs still play 1 game/week, not 4 games/week like clubs.
this argument is completely invalid, the slots are needed for clubs to train average players for the bench / rotation, not for NTs
(edited)
Thanks
I don't think Value is a particularly good indicator of anything and Average Individual Marks would have been more accurate than Team Marks.
I don't think Value is a particularly good indicator of anything and Average Individual Marks would have been more accurate than Team Marks.
There was no argument.
Tsolias only shared this information with everyone.
Tsolias only shared this information with everyone.
I understand one think, more good players less stars, this can be true?
That would be my conclusion by comparing current and previous Polish NT players
oookey, well... like socialism jajajaa
with this changes, I think the leagues will be more difficult and unpredictable
It's neither good nor bad, it's just a paradigm shift and I don't really see it as that bad.
with this changes, I think the leagues will be more difficult and unpredictable
It's neither good nor bad, it's just a paradigm shift and I don't really see it as that bad.