Subject: Thank you Sokker

Yes, it is well known that they introduced a handicap to lower the scores and that the handicap lead to more unfair / crazy results because with very big difference between teams it boosts scoring ratio / GK save ratio of weaker team and decreases them for better teams.

That’s why we now get so many 20:2 shots, 1:2 goals etc games

Each stat in the game is based on your midfield with exception of scoring and shots on goal.
Ball possesion, field play (which size has most activity), passing, defence, rating (largely influenced by PM).... But the domination of a match isn't who has the best stats, but who has the best chances and best goal / chance ratio

It doesn't seem to be very well known, apparently.

Check out this game

https://sokker.org/comment?matchID=43691592

One could say i should have lost but the win was 100% correct. Lets see if anyone can figure out why. Another example stats isn't everything

This is my match also. My opponent was strong but we didnt gave any 1-by-1 position to them. We had 3 around. We scored 0. He scored 2 goals but both of them again with heads. I am already trying to play my young players in game like 30 minutes also for training at first divison. But each game they are doing same expoit against me. Just crossing from wings with 1 midfielder and trying to score with head shots. İts happening mostly all divisions.


https://sokker.org/comment?matchID=43540664

Obvious, terrible GK

Still 0 goals out of 15 shots of oponent seems a bit on the unlucky side :P

Haha borkos is smart. Yea terrible gk plus one weak def and tactic trying to catch on offside.
I may be wrong but I think he didnt really have 3 strong chances. Many long shots. But it's been a while since I watched it.

It might be in Azerbaycan 4 def lines are used a lot, but in real top leagues, only 5 man defs go.....

İts not point how many defender they are playing. Point was about 1 winger midfielder and 2 forward exploit in game engine forcing everyone to use same mechanic. It was not look like fun to me. Already retarted about it at past. When heard sokker will change and came back to see what we will get. İ see same guys still defending same bad mechanics in game.

I don't know when you heard that the game engine was going to change ?
There haven't been any updates or even any announcements for a long time.

did you hear it in your dream lol
1 winger 2 forward doesnt work always and 1 winger 2 forward can be made into many different tactics.
nobody is defending game engine here - imo sokker still has many things to improve, like everything

Exceptions do not change the current situation.This is not a new issue in sokker.Many people got bored with the same situation in the past and stopped playing.

Whats your point?

A topic has been discussed here for the past two days.So many irrelevant opinions and unnecessary comments were written to negatively comment on the topic I wrote about that the actual subject of the discussion was forgotten.I warned them a few times that irrelevant comments were being made.

My point was about this topics.

-match engine favoring teams with low ratings
-players shots more accurate with heads than feets
-Long shot scorers more accurate than 1-by-1 positions
-players pass choices depending position than playmaking
-The game score is firstly simulating, after it goal animations processing.

-match engine favoring teams with low ratings
Every team encounters this issue at least 4-5 times a season.Sometimes you get the advantage in the score, sometimes the other side does, but this is one of the main factors influencing the outcome.In my opinion, there is no fair chance factor at all. When you watch these kinds of matches, it feels almost like you are watching a same match simulation.

-players shots more accurate with heads than feets
People who using this exploit in the game engine generally prefer to have one midfielder on the wing, cross the ball to the penalty spot, and then have two forwards score with headers or scrambles.The main point here is the way the goal is scored.Many experienced players, after seeing how easily goals are scored in this way, find other playing styles unnecessary. Almost everyone exploits the same way.Because it's quite tragicomic that a player who couldn't score in five one-on-one situations suddenly scores with a header from a cross.

-players pass choices depending position than playmaking
This is directly about this exploit This is directly related to the topic above.Even though the player's playmaking skills are weak, he prefers to make passes that reach the lone midfielder on the wing, regardless of the distance.This, in turn, encourages people to rely on a single midfielder on the wing to deliver crosses to the penalty spot, creating scoring opportunities through headers and scrambles with the forwards.

-Long shot scorers more accurate than 1-by-1 positions
Another point, though less significant, is the percentage of goals converted from long shots taken outside the penalty area than missed 1-by-1 positions. While this does not happen frequently, it is still worth noting.

-The game score is firstly simulating, after it goal animations processing.
Ultimately, everything comes down to this topic. We are just watching an animation of a match whose results are already known.Here, opportunities within the game don't just happen by watching.The result of the match is predetermined.Since the scores are known, the focus is on how the goals were scored.
(edited)

Sure and where is data supporting your statements? I.e. "Every team encounters this issue at least 4-5 times a season." - for example my team doesnt experience it so it is not every team.
(edited)

Because you are the one guy who using this exploits. You are getting better results and cannot encounter same issues in the game. İts why ı am saying only dinosaurs defending this game engine in the game.
(edited)