Subpage under development, new version coming soon!
Subject: [NT]bronho
So now you are getting angry ;)
Not a good thing for a NT coach.
You have to be nice to the people of India ;)
Not a good thing for a NT coach.
You have to be nice to the people of India ;)
So now you are getting angry ;)
Not a good thing for a NT coach.
I'm not angry. I only saying that you is a troublemaker. You don't have arguments. Just attack me and saying that I don't made my ideas. I speak this with the highest peace and calm of the world. BECAUSE IS FACT.
You say that India don't has 4 MIDs with enough defend. I don't believe on this. Its you words against the wind... so you is only making troubles.
You have to be nice to the people of India ;)
I ask for them came here and talk. I'm eager to hear them opinion.
Not a good thing for a NT coach.
I'm not angry. I only saying that you is a troublemaker. You don't have arguments. Just attack me and saying that I don't made my ideas. I speak this with the highest peace and calm of the world. BECAUSE IS FACT.
You say that India don't has 4 MIDs with enough defend. I don't believe on this. Its you words against the wind... so you is only making troubles.
You have to be nice to the people of India ;)
I ask for them came here and talk. I'm eager to hear them opinion.
You tell me that your tactics are better, so i like to see that.
Mine are not good ( you told me that) so i don't understand what you want to see ;)
Untill now we did see that your own tactic is not good enough for India.
Next to this you don't know anything of the players...
So looks clear.
(edited)
Mine are not good ( you told me that) so i don't understand what you want to see ;)
Untill now we did see that your own tactic is not good enough for India.
Next to this you don't know anything of the players...
So looks clear.
(edited)
Untill now we did see that your own tactic is not good enough for India.
WE you say you and your little friend, defamer.
Next to this you don't know anything of the players...
So looks clear.
And How Colud I know the players before become as a coach?
And can look, but not more tahn that.
Again you act like a chicken and don't show your WONDERFUL MOVES AS A COACH.
Only: Defame, make a trouble, Defame, make a trouble,Defame, make a trouble.
Really, you is a example of person. Congratulations
WE you say you and your little friend, defamer.
Next to this you don't know anything of the players...
So looks clear.
And How Colud I know the players before become as a coach?
And can look, but not more tahn that.
Again you act like a chicken and don't show your WONDERFUL MOVES AS A COACH.
Only: Defame, make a trouble, Defame, make a trouble,Defame, make a trouble.
Really, you is a example of person. Congratulations
For all Indians players:
Vote on candidate who you judge better.
My promess is India on world cup and at least 30 positions grow up on the ranking.
This is my final word for today. I come back on Wednesday.
(edited)
Vote on candidate who you judge better.
My promess is India on world cup and at least 30 positions grow up on the ranking.
This is my final word for today. I come back on Wednesday.
(edited)
I think everyone has seen enough of your abusive attitude towards other candidates, why is it neccessary to call people names every time ?
Hope you don't set the same example as a teacher ;)
The other thing is your promise to qualify for the World Cup and moving up 30 positions in the World Ranking, even possibly beating top 10 teams. That's something everyone can say and would like to achieve. It doesn't make you a special manager.
The games you show are mostly against opponents with higher average rating than yours, but their tactics are bad (in 3 matches).
Higher ratings are mostly caused because you play with 5 defenders and only 1 attacker.
In Sokker Attackers (+/- mark 70) get higher ratings more easily than defenders (+/- mark 50).
If your opponent plays with 2 strikers and with only 4 DEF's, the difference in rating is already explained for 2 points in average team-mark.
Also the difference in goalkeepers (GK) can cause big differences in average marks, for example in match :
- Tubarão - Porto FC Viamonense 0:1 , your goalkeeper reached 25 points more than the opponents GK, besides that Tubarao has a very defensive team, your own very defensive tactic with 4 DEF's and sometimes 7 players in your own box is suicide against teams who play more attacking than Tubarao. You won't see a team like that on NT level.
The game I liked was the first one : Porto FC Viamonense - Clube Atlético Suçuarana 2:0.
About your own tactics, defensively it looks a mess, leaving the wings wide open :
- Porto FC Viamonense - Areia 2:4 , tactics with right defensive wing fully open. Probably the reason why the right central defender got the red card, no tactic to be proud of.
The older games of 2009 (not against a serious active manager) and 2007 are not relevant to NT matches, level is too low.
Which makes me wonder why you didn't progress more after almost 5 years of Sokker. Still getting levels :
excellent Shooting
very good Passing
excellent Defending
doesn't impress me much.
One match, 2 seasons ago in 2009, was higher (Reis Futebol Clube - Porto FC Viamonense 1:4) since then you didnt manage to get a higher level of play.
You strongly declared yourself against playing with 5 DEF's , which makes you easier to play against. If I had to play against you and analyse your game, I would have fielded 1 or 2 deep wingers, which would have caused big problems in your defence. With only 3 or 4 DEF's in a row, you can't possibly defend that. Don't forget the wingers of the top 40-50 countries are of an extremely high quality in passing, even with your best defenders facing their strikers, leaving a wing open is deadly.
NT India has reached this level by offensive wing/passing-play and avoiding the duels in that department. The eye catchers of NT India (Kathiravan, Hiresh, Sadayappan) are extremely suited for this kind of play. I don't see you have enough experience with that.
All in all, I'm not saying you are a bad manager, but I'm also not impressed with your achievements.
No one heard of you before the election and now you come with a lot of noise and it must be said that sound a bit full of yourself.
I'm afraid you are just "passing through" and leave NT India after 1 season. I don't think I can cooperate with a manager like you on the NT database, which is very essential part of the relationship between an U21 and NT manager.
(edited)
Hope you don't set the same example as a teacher ;)
The other thing is your promise to qualify for the World Cup and moving up 30 positions in the World Ranking, even possibly beating top 10 teams. That's something everyone can say and would like to achieve. It doesn't make you a special manager.
The games you show are mostly against opponents with higher average rating than yours, but their tactics are bad (in 3 matches).
Higher ratings are mostly caused because you play with 5 defenders and only 1 attacker.
In Sokker Attackers (+/- mark 70) get higher ratings more easily than defenders (+/- mark 50).
If your opponent plays with 2 strikers and with only 4 DEF's, the difference in rating is already explained for 2 points in average team-mark.
Also the difference in goalkeepers (GK) can cause big differences in average marks, for example in match :
- Tubarão - Porto FC Viamonense 0:1 , your goalkeeper reached 25 points more than the opponents GK, besides that Tubarao has a very defensive team, your own very defensive tactic with 4 DEF's and sometimes 7 players in your own box is suicide against teams who play more attacking than Tubarao. You won't see a team like that on NT level.
The game I liked was the first one : Porto FC Viamonense - Clube Atlético Suçuarana 2:0.
About your own tactics, defensively it looks a mess, leaving the wings wide open :
- Porto FC Viamonense - Areia 2:4 , tactics with right defensive wing fully open. Probably the reason why the right central defender got the red card, no tactic to be proud of.
The older games of 2009 (not against a serious active manager) and 2007 are not relevant to NT matches, level is too low.
Which makes me wonder why you didn't progress more after almost 5 years of Sokker. Still getting levels :
excellent Shooting
very good Passing
excellent Defending
doesn't impress me much.
One match, 2 seasons ago in 2009, was higher (Reis Futebol Clube - Porto FC Viamonense 1:4) since then you didnt manage to get a higher level of play.
You strongly declared yourself against playing with 5 DEF's , which makes you easier to play against. If I had to play against you and analyse your game, I would have fielded 1 or 2 deep wingers, which would have caused big problems in your defence. With only 3 or 4 DEF's in a row, you can't possibly defend that. Don't forget the wingers of the top 40-50 countries are of an extremely high quality in passing, even with your best defenders facing their strikers, leaving a wing open is deadly.
NT India has reached this level by offensive wing/passing-play and avoiding the duels in that department. The eye catchers of NT India (Kathiravan, Hiresh, Sadayappan) are extremely suited for this kind of play. I don't see you have enough experience with that.
All in all, I'm not saying you are a bad manager, but I'm also not impressed with your achievements.
No one heard of you before the election and now you come with a lot of noise and it must be said that sound a bit full of yourself.
I'm afraid you are just "passing through" and leave NT India after 1 season. I don't think I can cooperate with a manager like you on the NT database, which is very essential part of the relationship between an U21 and NT manager.
(edited)
Finally you send a message that is well writed and objective. I answer in parts.
[i]I think everyone has seen enough of your abusive attitude towards other candidates, why is it neccessary to call people names every time ?
Hope you don't set the same example as a teacher ;)
I'm a example of my students. I'm extremely severe, but I can get a good affectivity of them. This because, in point of view, I'm a man of his word. If you felt yourself abused, its only because you despised my candidacy. (If you desagree of that, I can paste any of your posts in this forum...)
The other thing is your promise to qualify for the World Cup and moving up 30 positions in the World Ranking, even possibly beating top 10 teams. That's something everyone can say and would like to achieve. It doesn't make you a special manager.
How I said and has people to say for me if necessary, I'm man of his word.
The games you show are mostly against opponents with higher average rating than yours, but their tactics are bad (in 3 matches).
Ok. But never will be a perfect tatic. If his teams don't have any fail, it be impossible win with worst team, only by lucky, right?
Higher ratings are mostly caused because you play with 5 defenders and only 1 attacker.
In Sokker Attackers (+/- mark 70) get higher ratings more easily than defenders (+/- mark 50).
If your opponent plays with 2 strikers and with only 4 DEF's, the difference in rating is already explained for 2 points in average team-mark.
Also the difference in goalkeepers (GK) can cause big differences in average marks, for example in match :
- Tubarão - Porto FC Viamonense 0:1 , your goalkeeper reached 25 points more than the opponents GK, besides that Tubarao has a very defensive team, your own very defensive tactic with 4 DEF's and sometimes 7 players in your own box is suicide against teams who play more attacking than Tubarao. You won't see a team like that on NT level.
I agree with you, but these factors do not diminish my merit. I improvised with I have on that moment. In others cases, I will think better on otherwise.
The game I liked was the first one : Porto FC Viamonense - Clube Atlético Suçuarana 2:0.
About your own tactics, defensively it looks a mess, leaving the wings wide open :
- Porto FC Viamonense - Areia 2:4 , tactics with right defensive wing fully open. Probably the reason why the right central defender got the red card, no tactic to be proud of.
See the games. The players move a lot on my tatics. The right CB got the red card in his first foul on the game. Speak without see the games don't help your analysis.
You strongly declared yourself against playing with 5 DEF's , which makes you easier to play against. If I had to play against you and analyse your game, I would have fielded 1 or 2 deep wingers, which would have caused big problems in your defence. With only 3 or 4 DEF's in a row, you can't possibly defend that. Don't forget the wingers of the top 40-50 countries are of an extremely high quality in passing, even with your best defenders facing their strikers, leaving a wing open is deadly.
Not necessarily a defense in line with 4 players is worse than one with 5. What I see is too lazy to think of on the tactics of the opponent. If my opponent uses wings wide open I use my sidebacks more open too. It's all a matter of logistics to assess.
The craze of using 5 DEF's emerged as the staff very poorly positioned to defend their midfielders. With that their teams were easy targets of balls thrown in the middle of the defense. I do not make this kind of error. Be cool!
NT India has reached this level by offensive wing/passing-play and avoiding the duels in that department. The eye catchers of NT India (Kathiravan, Hiresh, Sadayappan) are extremely suited for this kind of play. I don't see you have enough experience with that.
All in all, I'm not saying you are a bad manager, but I'm also not impressed with your achievements.
No one heard of you before the election and now you come with a lot of noise and it must be said that sound a bit full of yourself.
I can adapt the tatic of India. I just need a chance.
Tanks for the words, but I think that I have a good walk on the sokker, with many trophies and good activitys.
I'm afraid you are just "passing through" and leave NT India after 1 season. I don't think I can cooperate with a manager like you on the NT database, which is very essential part of the relationship between an U21 and NT manager.
I'm here to bring India to the WC, and this maded also play the WC. This my intent.
As I said before, I am here explaining my intentions, promises and attributes. All I did so far was thinking of getting India to a better level. You claim now that he would collaborate with me in case of my victory. That does not seem attitude of those who think the best selection for your country. I hope I've misunderstood. I ask before for the help of Poey in this case and he deny. This is very ackward coming for the coach of India NT squad.
(edited)
[i]I think everyone has seen enough of your abusive attitude towards other candidates, why is it neccessary to call people names every time ?
Hope you don't set the same example as a teacher ;)
I'm a example of my students. I'm extremely severe, but I can get a good affectivity of them. This because, in point of view, I'm a man of his word. If you felt yourself abused, its only because you despised my candidacy. (If you desagree of that, I can paste any of your posts in this forum...)
The other thing is your promise to qualify for the World Cup and moving up 30 positions in the World Ranking, even possibly beating top 10 teams. That's something everyone can say and would like to achieve. It doesn't make you a special manager.
How I said and has people to say for me if necessary, I'm man of his word.
The games you show are mostly against opponents with higher average rating than yours, but their tactics are bad (in 3 matches).
Ok. But never will be a perfect tatic. If his teams don't have any fail, it be impossible win with worst team, only by lucky, right?
Higher ratings are mostly caused because you play with 5 defenders and only 1 attacker.
In Sokker Attackers (+/- mark 70) get higher ratings more easily than defenders (+/- mark 50).
If your opponent plays with 2 strikers and with only 4 DEF's, the difference in rating is already explained for 2 points in average team-mark.
Also the difference in goalkeepers (GK) can cause big differences in average marks, for example in match :
- Tubarão - Porto FC Viamonense 0:1 , your goalkeeper reached 25 points more than the opponents GK, besides that Tubarao has a very defensive team, your own very defensive tactic with 4 DEF's and sometimes 7 players in your own box is suicide against teams who play more attacking than Tubarao. You won't see a team like that on NT level.
I agree with you, but these factors do not diminish my merit. I improvised with I have on that moment. In others cases, I will think better on otherwise.
The game I liked was the first one : Porto FC Viamonense - Clube Atlético Suçuarana 2:0.
About your own tactics, defensively it looks a mess, leaving the wings wide open :
- Porto FC Viamonense - Areia 2:4 , tactics with right defensive wing fully open. Probably the reason why the right central defender got the red card, no tactic to be proud of.
See the games. The players move a lot on my tatics. The right CB got the red card in his first foul on the game. Speak without see the games don't help your analysis.
You strongly declared yourself against playing with 5 DEF's , which makes you easier to play against. If I had to play against you and analyse your game, I would have fielded 1 or 2 deep wingers, which would have caused big problems in your defence. With only 3 or 4 DEF's in a row, you can't possibly defend that. Don't forget the wingers of the top 40-50 countries are of an extremely high quality in passing, even with your best defenders facing their strikers, leaving a wing open is deadly.
Not necessarily a defense in line with 4 players is worse than one with 5. What I see is too lazy to think of on the tactics of the opponent. If my opponent uses wings wide open I use my sidebacks more open too. It's all a matter of logistics to assess.
The craze of using 5 DEF's emerged as the staff very poorly positioned to defend their midfielders. With that their teams were easy targets of balls thrown in the middle of the defense. I do not make this kind of error. Be cool!
NT India has reached this level by offensive wing/passing-play and avoiding the duels in that department. The eye catchers of NT India (Kathiravan, Hiresh, Sadayappan) are extremely suited for this kind of play. I don't see you have enough experience with that.
All in all, I'm not saying you are a bad manager, but I'm also not impressed with your achievements.
No one heard of you before the election and now you come with a lot of noise and it must be said that sound a bit full of yourself.
I can adapt the tatic of India. I just need a chance.
Tanks for the words, but I think that I have a good walk on the sokker, with many trophies and good activitys.
I'm afraid you are just "passing through" and leave NT India after 1 season. I don't think I can cooperate with a manager like you on the NT database, which is very essential part of the relationship between an U21 and NT manager.
I'm here to bring India to the WC, and this maded also play the WC. This my intent.
As I said before, I am here explaining my intentions, promises and attributes. All I did so far was thinking of getting India to a better level. You claim now that he would collaborate with me in case of my victory. That does not seem attitude of those who think the best selection for your country. I hope I've misunderstood. I ask before for the help of Poey in this case and he deny. This is very ackward coming for the coach of India NT squad.
(edited)
Common guys this is getting on my nerves now.
Just call it a truce...everyone's made their point....I guess the election results will speak for themselves.
If you'll still think you'll need to go at each other just exchange phone nos. or email ids
Just call it a truce...everyone's made their point....I guess the election results will speak for themselves.
If you'll still think you'll need to go at each other just exchange phone nos. or email ids
Sorry Pal. I think that discuss healthy for the game. But I respect your wish and I will shut up me. I only post now for questions to my person ok?.
hi,
i don't think that you have 1% chance of winning.. So here are advice when you try in future for any other country..
1. NEVER EVER criticise the current coach of the team.. It shows how arrogance you are..
2. Don't try to prove your point by having a heated arguement.. You gave hint of stubben in your arguement...
3. First show royalty and gain experience from small country.. Believe me.. It's one thing to handle your club(where you can buy or sell players as per your tactics) and other to handle a country.. Where you meet s**t a** like me who doesn't want to sell players or plays the top players too much and not have fit players for the match..
4. Don't promise things which you can't convince other of.. Jumping 30 places.. Man, do you really believe that while you have so called great plans, others are dump enough to gave away their tactics via email to you..
5. Never ever stand up for INDIA EVER AGAIN..
That's personnel opinion and take it otherwise..
i don't think that you have 1% chance of winning.. So here are advice when you try in future for any other country..
1. NEVER EVER criticise the current coach of the team.. It shows how arrogance you are..
2. Don't try to prove your point by having a heated arguement.. You gave hint of stubben in your arguement...
3. First show royalty and gain experience from small country.. Believe me.. It's one thing to handle your club(where you can buy or sell players as per your tactics) and other to handle a country.. Where you meet s**t a** like me who doesn't want to sell players or plays the top players too much and not have fit players for the match..
4. Don't promise things which you can't convince other of.. Jumping 30 places.. Man, do you really believe that while you have so called great plans, others are dump enough to gave away their tactics via email to you..
5. Never ever stand up for INDIA EVER AGAIN..
That's personnel opinion and take it otherwise..
ok, I resign. Tanks who vote on me. If you Indians prefer that, I quick.
PS.: I do not think that think that I'm shure its a arrogance, I always use facts and defend me against difames on my person.
PS.: I do not think that think that I'm shure its a arrogance, I always use facts and defend me against difames on my person.