Subpage under development, new version coming soon!
Subject: Religion differences
religion doesn't cause wars
people cause wars and say it's in the name of their religion :)
people cause wars and say it's in the name of their religion :)
You are right
People made up religions, and people were sent to wars in the name of those religions.
Therefore the religions were the excuse (cause) for wars
BTW, I did not write that the religion was the cause, I wrote that they were the reason (again "excuse")
(edited)
People made up religions, and people were sent to wars in the name of those religions.
Therefore the religions were the excuse (cause) for wars
BTW, I did not write that the religion was the cause, I wrote that they were the reason (again "excuse")
(edited)
only one religion wasn't made up but sent from above :)
No. Abraham was the inventor.
He initiated the greatest startup in human history
He initiated the greatest startup in human history
It's a subject you can argue alot about anyway no has any proof of anything so I think this argument is stuiped
To Matanb
We cannot argue about facts. It is the greatest success of a startup whether you like it or not. It's like Microsoft - you don't have to admire their products, but you have enough proof to appreciate their business acheivments.
To Eldar171
If there was a proof there was no argument. It would then be stupid to argue at all.
For example - before the 16th century, they all believed (except for Galileo) that the earth is flat and that it is static. There were quite tough arguments about this
However since no one has any proof regarding our debate, isn't this the ideal subject to argue?
We cannot argue about facts. It is the greatest success of a startup whether you like it or not. It's like Microsoft - you don't have to admire their products, but you have enough proof to appreciate their business acheivments.
To Eldar171
If there was a proof there was no argument. It would then be stupid to argue at all.
For example - before the 16th century, they all believed (except for Galileo) that the earth is flat and that it is static. There were quite tough arguments about this
However since no one has any proof regarding our debate, isn't this the ideal subject to argue?
The first one to start a religion that was based on a conceptual god
The first one we know about.
Maybe there were others, but he had the best Public relations' agent. ;)
Maybe there were others, but he had the best Public relations' agent. ;)
>It's like Microsoft - you don't have to admire their products, but you have enough proof to appreciate their business acheivments
yea. microsoft is a good way to prove that God is real:
do u see your windows software? it didnt just pop from nowhere, it was DESIGNED
the same goes for the software of all living creatures, its called DNA and its way more complex and perfect than windows... because it has an intelligent DESIGNER
;)
(edited)
yea. microsoft is a good way to prove that God is real:
do u see your windows software? it didnt just pop from nowhere, it was DESIGNED
the same goes for the software of all living creatures, its called DNA and its way more complex and perfect than windows... because it has an intelligent DESIGNER
;)
(edited)