Subpage under development, new version coming soon!
Subject: Random Factor
- 1
hwooi [del] to
All
Is it me alone or other have the same feeling that the random factor is very significant / prominent.
I noticed that many of the matches (if not more than 30%) actually have the lower rating teams (in one or all three departments) winning the match.
It is rather discouraging as sometimes when you are brimming with confidence, you were shock to see the post match analysis that you were thrashed big time.
Have your say here....
I noticed that many of the matches (if not more than 30%) actually have the lower rating teams (in one or all three departments) winning the match.
It is rather discouraging as sometimes when you are brimming with confidence, you were shock to see the post match analysis that you were thrashed big time.
Have your say here....
stats are not the importatnt thing tactics win games placing the right player in the rght position will help tactics ;)
After-match statistics
After the match the statistics for both teams are available:
- keeping the ball, possession time counted from the moment of gaining to the moment of losing. Set pieces do not count.
- playing on the given half, the time when the ball remained on one team’s half. If your team’s ratio exceeded 50%, do not celebrate - it means ithe players mainly defended rather than attacked!
- shots on goal
- fouls
- bookings
- efficiency of shooting, passing and defending, calculated as an average of marks for individual moves of all players (e.g. defender tackled the ball from his opponent or just attempted to then his defending skill shown during that move is taken to the total marks for the team). What he contributes depends on his defending skills, current form and whether he was successful. Even the best players mis-kick sometimes.
Remember that the marks concern the average individual performance of your players and do not take into account the fact how your players played as a team. That depends on you, specifically from the tactics you choose.
Copy out from the sokker rules. Please refer to the last paragraph, it say it all. All the statistic is laymen term shows how good your individual player is.
The actual result is how good your strategy work, is the right player in the right position. If you lose the match and your opponent have worst statistic, most probably it means your strategy fail you. Then you need to analyse the video see where goes wrong.
Maybe, it is to me only, I feel this part of the game is realistic, winning match don't depends heavilty on the players that you have, strategy and positioning play a vital role too, and this make me choose sokker instead of hattrick, which basically just a statistic game.
After the match the statistics for both teams are available:
- keeping the ball, possession time counted from the moment of gaining to the moment of losing. Set pieces do not count.
- playing on the given half, the time when the ball remained on one team’s half. If your team’s ratio exceeded 50%, do not celebrate - it means ithe players mainly defended rather than attacked!
- shots on goal
- fouls
- bookings
- efficiency of shooting, passing and defending, calculated as an average of marks for individual moves of all players (e.g. defender tackled the ball from his opponent or just attempted to then his defending skill shown during that move is taken to the total marks for the team). What he contributes depends on his defending skills, current form and whether he was successful. Even the best players mis-kick sometimes.
Remember that the marks concern the average individual performance of your players and do not take into account the fact how your players played as a team. That depends on you, specifically from the tactics you choose.
Copy out from the sokker rules. Please refer to the last paragraph, it say it all. All the statistic is laymen term shows how good your individual player is.
The actual result is how good your strategy work, is the right player in the right position. If you lose the match and your opponent have worst statistic, most probably it means your strategy fail you. Then you need to analyse the video see where goes wrong.
Maybe, it is to me only, I feel this part of the game is realistic, winning match don't depends heavilty on the players that you have, strategy and positioning play a vital role too, and this make me choose sokker instead of hattrick, which basically just a statistic game.
Another thing your players tactical discipline too is a factor, if most of your players have low tactical discipline and your opponents have higher tactical discipline, it might impact the result, regardless what statistic tell you.
Meaning, some team might be hard to beat if they don't rotate player, playing the same players for every matches inclusive of friendly. Thus they gain tactical discipline, even though they lose training. It might have a very small impact on the actual result, but how much time your player play together in a team is a factor.
It does explain, if you buy a better new player with low tactical discipline, you might not get result immediately, the player might need to settle in. But still think this is a minor factor, the bigger factor is still the strategy, the positioning in the 35 box.
(edited)
Meaning, some team might be hard to beat if they don't rotate player, playing the same players for every matches inclusive of friendly. Thus they gain tactical discipline, even though they lose training. It might have a very small impact on the actual result, but how much time your player play together in a team is a factor.
It does explain, if you buy a better new player with low tactical discipline, you might not get result immediately, the player might need to settle in. But still think this is a minor factor, the bigger factor is still the strategy, the positioning in the 35 box.
(edited)
- 1