Subpage under development, new version coming soon!
Subject: [NT]Malaysia
Hehe so he needs to wait , because in my and mysprs opinion he needs more tech and then def and speed.
He needs at least 3/4 level of tecnique, 2/3 of pace and a lot of defence :) for now after tecnique we prefer defence training :)
training precedence
all players 21+ Stamina minimum very good (9)
keeper:
keeper to magical (15)
pace very good (9)
and then keeper divine
defender:
defender outstanding (12)
pace excellent (10)
technique, passing and playmaker adequate (6)
and then defender and pace brillant/magical (14/15) and technique, passing and playmaker good/solid (7/8)
midfielder:
playmaking excellent (10)
pace very good (9)
techique very good (9)
passing excellent (10)
defender adequate (6)
then if mid-defender
pace formidable (11)
techique excellent (10)
defender excellent (10)
if mid
passing brillant (14)
playmaking incredible (13)
techique formidable (11)
pace formidable (11)
winger:
pace formidable (11)
playmaking very good (9)
passing formidable (11)
techique excellent (10)
forward:
striker technique pace incredible (13)
all players 21+ Stamina minimum very good (9)
keeper:
keeper to magical (15)
pace very good (9)
and then keeper divine
defender:
defender outstanding (12)
pace excellent (10)
technique, passing and playmaker adequate (6)
and then defender and pace brillant/magical (14/15) and technique, passing and playmaker good/solid (7/8)
midfielder:
playmaking excellent (10)
pace very good (9)
techique very good (9)
passing excellent (10)
defender adequate (6)
then if mid-defender
pace formidable (11)
techique excellent (10)
defender excellent (10)
if mid
passing brillant (14)
playmaking incredible (13)
techique formidable (11)
pace formidable (11)
winger:
pace formidable (11)
playmaking very good (9)
passing formidable (11)
techique excellent (10)
forward:
striker technique pace incredible (13)
Please update your NT player(s) into the Database :)
Maybe :p But when I was training tech last season , he popped on unsatisf. tech after 1, but on poor after... eight :p
it is a close match and unlucky one.
hope condor can come out with a post match analysis.
hope condor can come out with a post match analysis.
Can explain why Malaysia didnt use Shamsul Amri Faisal for this game instead of using ungku? I believe some other might know what the current NT Manager thinking? >.
Yeah , 8 ;) I know this is unbelievable , but that's the truth. I already pasted link with screen on polish forum. They couldn't believe in it to :)
Hmm i dont think it is close match, first we atk no much, more on def. 14 shoot vs 3 shoot.
As mention before by few candidates, attack is malaysia stronger path. And now malaysia Attacking level drop from one match and another.
As mention before by few candidates, attack is malaysia stronger path. And now malaysia Attacking level drop from one match and another.
I think that the reason is in his form. Now he has good form (7/17), Ungku has divine
(17/17)
(17/17)
ahjun, as mentioned b4 Malaysia attack is good, but midfield is bad.
Thus, especially against better team, don't expect Malaysia will have a lot of chances.
I don't think, our attack is bad, just that previously you convert some of them, however on the last 3 rounds, the striker don't convert it.
When, I am comparing the attack, please compare the matches against better team in qualifying, don't compare it against friendly game like Singapore and Indonesia.
Talking about performance today,
1) I thought the positioning and defence is good, just an individual mistake by Ali Wahab, don't think he is ready yet. Althought I understand limitation in defence and he needs game. condor is introducing a lot of younger good NT defenders lateley, and they need time to settle. Their experience and teamwork are not in satisfactory level yet.
2) I think on the attack, the NT coach pay more attention on speed and technique as the criteria, which I think it is the logical thing to do. However, Malaysian striker that have better speed and technique, does not have brilliant striker, thus it affect on the conversion. Of course, form, experience and teamwork also count.
But I think it don't work, because lower striker will not get goal. Previously, player like ahjun's striker get a goal in his first game, although I think it is a very lucky one, because he has less than good pace and technique, he only get it on set piece.
My opinion is either Rafaek and ahjun's striker, higher striker rate, given a chance in the line up, I know their pace and technique sucks, but think they should involve in some of the game and hope got lucky break like converting set piece and corner kick, which don't need pace and technique.
The incredible striker or less that we play right now, is not good enought to beat the divine keepers of our opponents.
I think our strikers are doing ok, have some minor setback, bear in mind we are not playing Indonesia and Singapore, no offence, that they do not have divine keepers.
Back to reality, our striker is not that good, we don't have a single striker that qualify to have minimum standard which is
pace incredible
technique incredible
striker incredible
What I mean our striker is our strenght, it really means, on all the three departments, defender, midfielder and striker and compare it to the international standard, our striker department gap is closer compare to the other.
But expecting our incredible striker to do well against divine keepers are a bit too much to ask. If brilliant striker and with some luck, you might still get some chance. That is why I ask Rafaek and ahjun's striker get some time, even their pace and techniques are sucks.
Thus, especially against better team, don't expect Malaysia will have a lot of chances.
I don't think, our attack is bad, just that previously you convert some of them, however on the last 3 rounds, the striker don't convert it.
When, I am comparing the attack, please compare the matches against better team in qualifying, don't compare it against friendly game like Singapore and Indonesia.
Talking about performance today,
1) I thought the positioning and defence is good, just an individual mistake by Ali Wahab, don't think he is ready yet. Althought I understand limitation in defence and he needs game. condor is introducing a lot of younger good NT defenders lateley, and they need time to settle. Their experience and teamwork are not in satisfactory level yet.
2) I think on the attack, the NT coach pay more attention on speed and technique as the criteria, which I think it is the logical thing to do. However, Malaysian striker that have better speed and technique, does not have brilliant striker, thus it affect on the conversion. Of course, form, experience and teamwork also count.
But I think it don't work, because lower striker will not get goal. Previously, player like ahjun's striker get a goal in his first game, although I think it is a very lucky one, because he has less than good pace and technique, he only get it on set piece.
My opinion is either Rafaek and ahjun's striker, higher striker rate, given a chance in the line up, I know their pace and technique sucks, but think they should involve in some of the game and hope got lucky break like converting set piece and corner kick, which don't need pace and technique.
The incredible striker or less that we play right now, is not good enought to beat the divine keepers of our opponents.
I think our strikers are doing ok, have some minor setback, bear in mind we are not playing Indonesia and Singapore, no offence, that they do not have divine keepers.
Back to reality, our striker is not that good, we don't have a single striker that qualify to have minimum standard which is
pace incredible
technique incredible
striker incredible
What I mean our striker is our strenght, it really means, on all the three departments, defender, midfielder and striker and compare it to the international standard, our striker department gap is closer compare to the other.
But expecting our incredible striker to do well against divine keepers are a bit too much to ask. If brilliant striker and with some luck, you might still get some chance. That is why I ask Rafaek and ahjun's striker get some time, even their pace and techniques are sucks.
as mentioned b4 Malaysia attack is good, but midfield is bad.
Now you are saying that the midfield is bad... You cant blame the strikers for not converting their chances when they have only 3 shots on goal... Higher pace and technical strikers are better than higher striker levels. Whats the point of having a striker with brilliant striker level and good pace, when they are too slow to use their striker skill.
Also, If the midfield is not strong, they will not be able to supply to strikers with decent balls to run onto or receive and then have the chance to put it away...
Again, the tactic is very very defensive. If you play a more attacking game you will create more chances for the strikers.
@ Condor
Did you watch Bulgaria's last match?? They played with 3 strikers! why would you not MARK them!! And if they are using 3 at the back, why not take full advantage of that and play a high winger to get the balls into the box for the strikers to finish!!
Try a more attacking tactic and you might be able to score a goal...
Even Wooikeim's tactics from last season were more attacking... They were certainly not the best but were attacking and Malaysia still managed to score against Italy in the WCQ's!! Why is it that you have not been able to score a goal yet with the Malaysian NT. Considering that you play in Italian Serie B, I believe that Malaysian users would have expected results from your first 2-3 games. Even scoring a goal! not having a goal difference of -11!
0-11 in 3 games simply cant be good enough... Malaysia is better than that. Result against Peru was fair as they are a much better nation, Result against Moldova should have been MUCH closer. 3-1 or similar. Against Bulgaria, you should have easily been able to work out their weaknesses and capitalise on them!
Now you are saying that the midfield is bad... You cant blame the strikers for not converting their chances when they have only 3 shots on goal... Higher pace and technical strikers are better than higher striker levels. Whats the point of having a striker with brilliant striker level and good pace, when they are too slow to use their striker skill.
Also, If the midfield is not strong, they will not be able to supply to strikers with decent balls to run onto or receive and then have the chance to put it away...
Again, the tactic is very very defensive. If you play a more attacking game you will create more chances for the strikers.
@ Condor
Did you watch Bulgaria's last match?? They played with 3 strikers! why would you not MARK them!! And if they are using 3 at the back, why not take full advantage of that and play a high winger to get the balls into the box for the strikers to finish!!
Try a more attacking tactic and you might be able to score a goal...
Even Wooikeim's tactics from last season were more attacking... They were certainly not the best but were attacking and Malaysia still managed to score against Italy in the WCQ's!! Why is it that you have not been able to score a goal yet with the Malaysian NT. Considering that you play in Italian Serie B, I believe that Malaysian users would have expected results from your first 2-3 games. Even scoring a goal! not having a goal difference of -11!
0-11 in 3 games simply cant be good enough... Malaysia is better than that. Result against Peru was fair as they are a much better nation, Result against Moldova should have been MUCH closer. 3-1 or similar. Against Bulgaria, you should have easily been able to work out their weaknesses and capitalise on them!