Subject: Effect of youth coach

Could someone give me an idea on the difference in time to increase 1 level for a hypothetical youth player with 1. Formidable junior coach vs. 2. Incredible vs. 3 Brilliant? I would appreciate any input including your own personal opinion.

Example: Formid coach takes 5 weeks to raise skill of player by 1 whilst Brilliant takes 3?

Trying to figure out what is justifiable for my team expenditure at present time.

Thank you in advance.

not shure at all but i belive it deepend most on the junior and when he comes out ull see the diference but im not shure about this never payed atention to it and i jumped from exelent to briliant

Formid coach takes 5 weeks to raise skill of player by 1 whilst Brilliant takes 3

Difference isn't that big...

it's more like this:

with formidable coach your player pops like this:

5-5-5-5-5

with brilliant coach:

5-4-5-4-5

difference isn't very big, but if your player stays in you youth squad about 30 week's he could be 1-2 level higher when pulled up if you use brilliant youth coach

Thank you for your answers... that does not make it economically viable for a small team like mine. I only ask because one youth player of mine that popped only every 5-6 weeks has popped in skill every 2-3 weeks without fail. I did not expect this to happen and am now a little confused ;).

Since I have your attention.... One more question:

Some people seem to suggest that main coach level in skill being trained is only part of the calculation and that the Main coach's general skill also plays a role.

Example: Excellent coach with unearthly in playmaking trains playmaking slower than a brilliant coach with unearthly in playmaking. I find this contradictory to the explanation on training. I was under the impression that all that matters for a main coach is the skill he is training vs general appraisal is for junior and asst coaches?

Which is true?

from that what i know 1st coach's general skill have no importance for the general training.

but with better coach you could have more untraining pops.
(edited)

Yes, you know it =)

if you training for example defending, then skills which effect (for example) playmaking skill's general training are

head coachs playmaking skill + overall skills of assistant coaches, in generall training in striking = head coach striking skill + assistants overall skill...

only thing where had coach overall skill effects is your players team-work.

team-work of players try to go near your head coach overall skill...

for example if your head coach overall skill is solid, then your players team-work tries to go somewhere around adequate - very good..

also your head coach overall skill isn't only thing which effect in team-work skill, also count of games which player has been played in your team will effect...

more games leads that team-work is higher...

So to summarise:

1. Small clubs like me don't need a brilliant/incredible youth coach unless we have so much income that getting one is natural progression (very small benefit to cost ratio).

2. Only need to boost up general appraisal level for asst coaches, although having a main coach with high skills in other areas might increase untrained increases in level.

Correct? :)

Thank you for all your input guys. It is much appreciated.
I guess I am a long way from being at the point where I can afford to maintain brilliant coaches. For the moment formidable will have to do.