Subpage under development, new version coming soon!
Subject: National Team Games
I arrive to the same conclusion ..that`s why I delete my msg and chary the chat on sk mail.
Hopfully after he will see a bit of the tactic hint and fiind a way to establish it, the tactic will be much different by this one. :D
Hopfully after he will see a bit of the tactic hint and fiind a way to establish it, the tactic will be much different by this one. :D
Haha! You have 'underestimated' me. Actually, I know it already, before I play the game.In all my tactics, all the 35 points are covered and revised. I believe that I'm not that kind of the irresponsible person you think of. Every time before I play a game, I would read all the rules, and a lot of forum post in order to get familiar with the game.
(edited)
(edited)
Actually, I play this game mainly because of it's interesting tactic (35-point) system.
This might be a shock for me, but let`s say I`m glad enywhay because you know it now.
First game is coming soon so good luck, we will follow our little talk on sokker pm :d
First game is coming soon so good luck, we will follow our little talk on sokker pm :d
What do you think about the recent game?
My opinion: Though lost, H.K. produce 3-4 threats while the opposing team produced 6 -7. The attacker falls a bit too back hindering counter attacks, the winger is poor in stamina thus loses pace significantly when approaching the end game.
My opinion: Though lost, H.K. produce 3-4 threats while the opposing team produced 6 -7. The attacker falls a bit too back hindering counter attacks, the winger is poor in stamina thus loses pace significantly when approaching the end game.
I already told you my first oppinion , but need first to see the game also.
Like I already told you :
1. The defence line is to large, to many spaces betwen the players. Is also to forward, and venezuela att are on limit on off-side line ...
2. The no. 3 was to withdraw..that must be put more on mid with the order to cover entire half from center to defence line.
3. I also notice that is a certain space betwen all line ..like the mid line is not there, show only def and att
4. Diferent mystake in players position, but we will correct that for the next game.
5. In big pictures the game wasen`t so bad, but was loose because the tactic and because some positions really need better players.
Talk on sk mail about the rest.
Stely give us your ideas.
(edited)
(edited)
1. The defence line is to large, to many spaces betwen the players. Is also to forward, and venezuela att are on limit on off-side line ...
2. The no. 3 was to withdraw..that must be put more on mid with the order to cover entire half from center to defence line.
3. I also notice that is a certain space betwen all line ..like the mid line is not there, show only def and att
4. Diferent mystake in players position, but we will correct that for the next game.
5. In big pictures the game wasen`t so bad, but was loose because the tactic and because some positions really need better players.
Talk on sk mail about the rest.
Stely give us your ideas.
(edited)
(edited)
1. many space between the players in defence.
2. try to set the defence to be a LINE anytime.
3 the distance between mids .i don`t know Akandu Sze Ming(no. 11) `s skills but he must to be a very good player to can play only him Central MID
4. att a little bit close..
good luck nt next match.:) and tomorow
2. try to set the defence to be a LINE anytime.
3 the distance between mids .i don`t know Akandu Sze Ming(no. 11) `s skills but he must to be a very good player to can play only him Central MID
4. att a little bit close..
good luck nt next match.:) and tomorow
exactly like I say ..hopefully next game I`ll be abel to send him a tactic and this error will disapear.
Sad because was a game that can be win, but it was lose.
This is ... the rest will be much better. :D
Sad because was a game that can be win, but it was lose.
This is ... the rest will be much better. :D
The next game was against Russia. Higher chance for victory I suppose. I think a 4-3-3 tactic could be used. What do you think?
4-3-3 is the best Sokker tactic, but to not loose the match you must build a very solid midfield, I advice you to put the three mids very close each other ;)
don't use the midfield to cover more than necessary, it's 4-3-3, an offensive tactic, so let's offend! :)
put the four defenders close so: X_X_X_X
with only 1 space between them, and use the two backwings to stop the opponent on the wings, because with only 3 midfielders we can't lose a man in the mid to cover on the wing.
If you want I can show you my personal interpretation of the 4-3-3, I have a video with it :)
I can upload the video and send you the link.
Maybe I can adapt my 4-3-3 for HK's players, if you want :)
[size=4 color=red]HELL, LET'S WIN! WIN IS FOR WINNERS[/color]
(edited)
don't use the midfield to cover more than necessary, it's 4-3-3, an offensive tactic, so let's offend! :)
put the four defenders close so: X_X_X_X
with only 1 space between them, and use the two backwings to stop the opponent on the wings, because with only 3 midfielders we can't lose a man in the mid to cover on the wing.
If you want I can show you my personal interpretation of the 4-3-3, I have a video with it :)
I can upload the video and send you the link.
Maybe I can adapt my 4-3-3 for HK's players, if you want :)
[size=4 color=red]HELL, LET'S WIN! WIN IS FOR WINNERS[/color]
(edited)
3-1-4-2
Much better , because the game will be play on midle and there is need of powerfull player.
Much better , because the game will be play on midle and there is need of powerfull player.
This time is a draw. Quite lucky indeed. The situation is that our attacker is too slow and hardly dribble through the Russians and the Russian attackers are keep dribbling our defenders.
Any advice for improvement in tactic?
Any advice for improvement in tactic?