Subject: [NT] U27 European Championship - Season 6

Its just discussion i prefer all to be accepted with votes so poll is in progress. Anyone has right for opinion. If we vote preferences for smaller country i will document all before we start. If my health improve do not worrie euro will be held. With a lot countries there will be problems always we just need to take it easy.

np, just one alternative opinion before we start votes.

this option is part of the poll soon i will have all results poll is with all current nt trainers

Just out of curiosity, what are the questions in the poll?

imo the u27 version it's the best option, i'm against to create new age rules

make it U27 for all or no age limit at all
adding some new rules for some countries will be difficult, coz for some it was hard even with that system.

Even if will be no limit age, i'm 100% sure that big countries will play with many u27 players in that competition.Not all, but many.

I played in several editions of the European Championship and I must say that I like the championship with current rules of U27
Beside the gap between small and big teams exists without age limits.

U27 is the best option. Second championship with ,,A team" is unnecessary.

I vote veto

for me u27 is fine but we extended the tournament to 32 nations and now if we want to fill it we need small nations that really needs protection
maybe we just define those nations and give only for them few players with 1 age at least. that is my point hope you all guys understand the idea

What do you think about idea of keeping U27 limit but adding 3 older players without limit for every nation, not just those countries that are weaker?
It would not change much for stronger countries because they would just swap three very good players to a bit stronger ones but it would help weaker countries that have problems with setting up their lineups.

I think the best situation is to play with players from U27 and eventually go for the option with 3 players without limitation.There is no need to promote weak teams because it isn't going to bring positive feedback.Untill now the rules were clear to be honest i don't understand why we should change something that has been working so far.

the reason i want to change it cause last season was not working for me as organizator
a lot 3:0 walk overs ...
it works with 16 teams but with 32 teams is hard
so many teams left competition last season and do not started so suggestion was posted at that time.
poll is best way to decide so its in progress
i have 17 responds waiting from 47 euro nations so soon i will show the results

Hi. You asked, so I replied to the poll.

I'd like us to join the competition (if reelected) under any rules decided, but since You asked and gave the opportunity to answer C:other than U27, here are my 5 cents:

IF the idea is that we want to field younger players - those ready for next WC 2 seasons later (in 3 seasons) - without meeting opponents who field their current best, then I think U28 or even U29 would be a better deal for all of us.

Note the IF. If that is not the whole idea and this is more of a tradition now (I haven't really followed earlier seasons, tbh) then U27 is fine, as would be U25, U23 or whatever. Same for all, just one extra rule - and who's best?

But those aged 27 this season will be too old. And when qualification is secured and we aaaaalll go to WC, those players will be 30. And peaking. Possibly ahead of all those who get to play next year.

I don't think any special rules are needed. Same for all. The fun part is that a weaker country may actually be better, if we restrict it to U-something for all. I have nothing against special rules like U27+3 U30 or whatever, but I think it should be for all.

With that said: the first question: will we join? : A! Yes. Second question: You decide! :)

I vote veto to everything that man said!!

he is the NT you are the spammer :) next season if you are elected i will ask you now pls do not spam :)