Subject: [NT] U27 European Championship - Season 13 sign up

LOL, it was not about mentioning my name ;P It was about this part:: "...by this figures one can be sure to achieve maximum individual training." In other words:
Players can achieve full trainning on their clubs. NT (or U21) is not responsible for the training of the players.

... and for this last sentence you may quote me, accuse me, burn me, or whatever you want. ;P LOL

i really like this table so no ment to offend or joke thanks for it! for real

Not offended - just kidding! ;)
I am in good mood my friend ;D

Afaik they lose the extra training, but get the experience and teamwork.

Actually this nothing new to me, i used to use this in CC when i reached the quarters twice, cause i still had cup + league and even not 10 trainees....

I hope the quarters wont stop me this time...

https://sokker.org/comment?matchID=30548028

https://sokker.org/comment/matchID/30555184

i would like to add one poll not only for NT users but for all just to see overall opinion about age limit in Euro tournaments. In the past i did such research through all NT and after voting tournament remind u27 but after some discussion in my country seems users do not like age limits so lets see what people from other countries think...

Still I feel 100% is not achievable with the current training system. Cause you train more with 3 matches than you do with 2.
I know most of the managers don't follow this but I'm of the opinion of lineair regression.
Meaning... The table of Tsolias only partially is correct.

league = 95%
Friendly = 80%
NT = approx 50%

BUT

league + friendly = 95% + 80% of the remaining 5% which is 4%, so total = 99%
NT + League = 50% + 95% of the remaining 50% = 97.5%
NT + Friendly = 50% + 80% of remaining 50% = 90%
NT + League + Friendly = 50% + 95% of remaining 50%, which is 47.5 + 80% of remaining 2.5% which is 2% = 99.5%

I agree

But the chance of injuries for just half percent totally not worthy to play 3 games per week ..

Indeed.
Even the 4 extra % for playing league + friendly isn't worth the risk imo...

A long time ago I coached Pilipinas U21. I monitored the training of a GK on each detail (minutes played and training points) starting at very low skill level. I remember when the GK had gk 14 and he had already made some trainings, I told to his manager to set him only on Wednesday for 11 minutes. It would be enough for the next skillup.
The gk played 13 minutes on Wednesday and the next day he jumped to magical [15]
This was a story, based on hard facts (figures/numbers), showing the accuracy of counting training the way I do.
I have nothing more to say here...

You could never know exactly how much behind the comma his value was. It could very well be he managed the skillpop without the 13 minutes friendly play.

I just wrote that I could.I could and I still can, like also some other people who also can.
It's just math!

I don't think your interpretation to be correct.

2 games per week are enough. NT gives XP that is very very important.

I have gone with simple sum that uses asisterrion and it works nice. Explanation of rules should be improved. Everybody understand different things, no idea who is right or wrong, just go with your interpretation :s

I know... many don't believe this method. Still...it is as accurate as any other assumption. But not a single one has been proven to be 100% accurate.
@tsolias.... math can be done with unknown values, but the outcome will still be an unknown value. And the reason you can never know is because you will never be 100% sure about the exact value a skill has since you never knew the exact begin value...