Subject: »[info]Dev Diary #82: Automatic release of NT-players from

I have the same question.

Was not intentional, as answered here: https://sokker.org/forum_topic/ID_forum/1261/ID_topic/3442514/pg/2

I also want to know if this will be fixed soon, or if will be when new graphic get released, i hope the new test server help to speed up any improvements.

A team of programmers

Meanwhile, we plan to expand the programming team with another two people - to work on frontend and backend. Recruitment for these two positions is ongoing and we hope that the final interviews will take place soon.

How much do you pay for such position, if its not a secret? :-)

You guys are planning on having someone to test this changes? I mean a QA person.

We are the QA persons. It would be silly to not use few xp players in test server.

+1

@ Raúl, a friend told me that I have missed training for two weeks, why is that so? It discourages me a little and it makes no sense that if a player has already played me with an att order, when I put him on Wednesday in friendlies with a def order, I will miss training. It makes no sense for my att order to play on Wednesday to be erased. How will this work with the new changes?
I am starting to play again and it is unmotivating to miss two trainings for this.

Currently, the rules say, the last order a player played with, counts for training. I agree that it's a stupid rule, but for the remaining time before the great updates, this will still be the rule. So, DON'T play players on wednesdays matches on other positions then sunday matches IF you want your player(s) to receive the training with the order they get on sundaymatches.

But, with the new updates, this rule will be adjusted so this "problem" will never occur again...

Yes, I said him so, that's a stupid rule.

I seem to remember Raul said that maybe order would continue taken into consideration, but It woud be more logical in this case to save Sunday order too.

---

Last known change will be "most minutes played with order X during a week", but it has flaws with NT matches and those orders..

We will have more discussion on that later.

I don't know if it is discussed before but current player forms are also very confusing .
ı've seen some players who is always in lower form levels and currently there is no logic behind of it .

Is there anything planned also for this ?

Has been mentioned, but without a proposition.

It used to be that the corners have the same height when they have 1/2 of the seats as the main stands. So, if the NW stand had 5000 seats and the North stand had 10000, both would have the same height.

Yep, we will check, and maybe fix - but as we will develop new graphic design (so same new stadium visualization), it's not a priority at the moment:)

How much do you pay for such position, if its not a secret? :-)

It's a secret :P

We need to work with it a bit, but i think, that in new training system it will be best to give full control for users - if you want to train someone as ATT, and you will set it that way, he should get ATT training + training bonus accelerated with minutes he played in that week as ATT too (no matter if he played any other game on different possition).

As example, if player played:
50 minutes as ATT
and 90 as DEF in last game (wednesday)...

You should be still able to set him ATT training - and he will get basic training for ATT + bonus from 50 minutes, no matter which game was first.

So it will be your decision what is better for you, maybe it will be good idea, to switch his training for DEF. but you will have control.