Subpage under development, new version coming soon!
Subject: »[info]Dev Diary #82: Automatic release of NT-players from
I know I shouldn't but I wouldn't if the admins were doing their job to stop him breaking sokker rules 2 and 8 for so long.
@Raul i know you like to negotiate lets reduce it to 2 weeks :)
We will check with tests, we suppose, that new rule is additional for cirrent system. We can always move that limit higher. But its good starting point for test.
It should work combined with arcade bug fixing and new training system (slighty losing skills if not playing at all).
If it will be not enough - squad limit is an option, but its a bit complicated (we should develop solutions what to do if you reached limit and just get new junior, etc). Thats why we decided for time limit first.
It should work combined with arcade bug fixing and new training system (slighty losing skills if not playing at all).
If it will be not enough - squad limit is an option, but its a bit complicated (we should develop solutions what to do if you reached limit and just get new junior, etc). Thats why we decided for time limit first.
Starting idea was 6 weeks, like typical transfer window (half of new season lenght):) so its already negotiated!;)
(edited)
(edited)
no need, idc about that guy, he does not play in my country and till i will play champions league he will not play sokker anymore :D :D.
I just reacted about your interpretation in a German way, if there is a rule, you follow it, you dont make exceptions.
I "quit/rebelled" being a mod because exactly this, when a Turkish admin without knowing any word in Slovak overruled my decision about content written in Slovak. So i know how this works already.
That being said, the 4 weeks rule will solve this problem from my perspective, so starting from next season things will be more fair. So no need to continue this conversation, i said what i wanted :-).
I just reacted about your interpretation in a German way, if there is a rule, you follow it, you dont make exceptions.
I "quit/rebelled" being a mod because exactly this, when a Turkish admin without knowing any word in Slovak overruled my decision about content written in Slovak. So i know how this works already.
That being said, the 4 weeks rule will solve this problem from my perspective, so starting from next season things will be more fair. So no need to continue this conversation, i said what i wanted :-).
If it will be not enough - squad limit is an option, but its a bit complicated (we should develop solutions what to do if you reached limit and just get new junior, etc). Thats why we decided for time limit first.
That's true.
That's true.
player limitation makes more sense
With player limitation they could still do the same. Theoretically they could sell and buy the whole team(24 players) every week.
With player limitation they could still do the same. Theoretically they could sell and buy the whole team(24 players) every week.
There could be other ways to go around this
1) What if we reduce the number of transfers per season to say, 10?
2) Or increase transfer tax if more than 1 player is placed on TL within 2 weeks? For example, 30% tax if player is sold within 2 weeks? Of course, this should be exempt for newly signed juniors of the same club.
Or a combination of the above rules? Increasing taxes will go a long way to reduce the current inflation in the market as some other users say.
I'm not saying that the current decision is wrong though. Just exploring other possible measures that can reduce unfair trading. It would also be better if we place limit on fire duration as well. Like, a player can't be fired unless he is atleast 2 weeks with the club.
(edited)
(edited)
1) What if we reduce the number of transfers per season to say, 10?
2) Or increase transfer tax if more than 1 player is placed on TL within 2 weeks? For example, 30% tax if player is sold within 2 weeks? Of course, this should be exempt for newly signed juniors of the same club.
Or a combination of the above rules? Increasing taxes will go a long way to reduce the current inflation in the market as some other users say.
I'm not saying that the current decision is wrong though. Just exploring other possible measures that can reduce unfair trading. It would also be better if we place limit on fire duration as well. Like, a player can't be fired unless he is atleast 2 weeks with the club.
(edited)
(edited)
It will be probably easiest change to be made if from some reasons it will be to much. So i wouldnt be worried today.
im not worried i do not have money for good transfers i buy and i fire :)
I would like to know Raul if in those 4 weeks the player who has to stay in the team will have to play a minimum of matches. If not, then we are giving all wild traders the solution when the arcade bug is removed. If you follow the wild traders you can see that the players remain in their clubs an average of 2/3 weeks before being sold again. The arcade bug allows them not to have to play any official or friendly match to skip the daytrading rules.
So what is the improvement? that they only have to wait one more week to sell a player? The real problem with wildtraders is the requirement that players have to play a minimum number of matches on their team (and that they cannot use the arcade bug).
the rule should include: 4 weeks of permanence in your club and playing at least 4 matches (one per week) (or 2 or 3). But some matches
(edited)
So what is the improvement? that they only have to wait one more week to sell a player? The real problem with wildtraders is the requirement that players have to play a minimum number of matches on their team (and that they cannot use the arcade bug).
the rule should include: 4 weeks of permanence in your club and playing at least 4 matches (one per week) (or 2 or 3). But some matches
(edited)