Subpage under development, new version coming soon!
Subject: »[info]Dev Diary #82: Automatic release of NT-players from
I don't use it, but there is no advantage when everyone can choose that approach... I can't see why is not fair play, though.
If one team plays against other team using the corners, there would be also a reduced probability of injuries for both teams.
The all-in-the-corner team is also sacrificing ranking points and supporter's mood, which translate to money.
Injuries are good anyway, that's like real life, as long as you play games, you are exposed to it... and it is a challenge to overcome those situations.
If one team plays against other team using the corners, there would be also a reduced probability of injuries for both teams.
The all-in-the-corner team is also sacrificing ranking points and supporter's mood, which translate to money.
Injuries are good anyway, that's like real life, as long as you play games, you are exposed to it... and it is a challenge to overcome those situations.
well i hate comparing game that training is based on min played with RL but in real life probability to have injury in official game and in friendly training is not the same and here should not be the same as well
Well I used the corner tactic for the first time 2 weeks ago in friendly and..... I got a player injuried for 13 days !
Quickly came back to a normal tactic for the next friendlies...
Quickly came back to a normal tactic for the next friendlies...
Listening, dont worry about me ;)
Relaxed mood for friendlies could be probably an option.
(edited)
Relaxed mood for friendlies could be probably an option.
(edited)
@raul Will you establish a X-week period to put on sale players who don't play matches?
Sometimes (depending of form) a player can be put up for sale or not. For example last week I could put on sale a player and now I can't.
I think a 6-7 week period could be established, according to reality not all players debut.
(edited)
Sometimes (depending of form) a player can be put up for sale or not. For example last week I could put on sale a player and now I can't.
I think a 6-7 week period could be established, according to reality not all players debut.
(edited)
We think, that we will keep current mechanism + add new rule.
We still need some blocade for traiding, instead some users will buy player massively and resell them after 4 weeks.
Current algoritm is quite complicated, maybe we will rework it a bit, to make it more realistic. For now it counts many factors and it's not perfect.
We still need some blocade for traiding, instead some users will buy player massively and resell them after 4 weeks.
Current algoritm is quite complicated, maybe we will rework it a bit, to make it more realistic. For now it counts many factors and it's not perfect.
I'm saying after 7-8 weeks maybe. I don't know if current system would allow It.
(edited)
(edited)
We still need some blocade for traiding, instead some users will buy player massively and resell them after 4 weeks.
Make it 4(or more) matches played instead of 4 weeks in the team and you have solved that problem.
They cant mass buy and mass play all players. Only if they sacrifice the results.
Make it 4(or more) matches played instead of 4 weeks in the team and you have solved that problem.
They cant mass buy and mass play all players. Only if they sacrifice the results.
I get your point - i think, it's still about fixing current algoritm - it should count weeks in your club, number of other transfers, and if you are not a day trader (like just sold 20 other players) then even player without any games should be able to left club, as he can feel dissapointed due to lack of play.
@sviktorov: first injuries are random and unfortunately may hit same teams over and over again...
second this is not cheating how you will prove the intonations of user maybe he wanted to win this way
on top ive seen 3 injuries in safe tactics as well ...
If this is cheating then any good tactics that wins is cheating as well cause its exploits the weakens of sokker ..
When a random factor is applied to all, it ceases to be unequal to everyone. This is clear cut cheating however you try to justify it.
@slavista: It is the problem on the game side, not on the user side.
Maybe DEVs can reduce the frequency/duration of injuries but regardless, these tactics should stop.
@dasanchez86: I don't use it, but there is no advantage when everyone can choose that approach... I can't see why is not fair play, though.
If one team plays against other team using the corners, there would be also a reduced probability of injuries for both teams.
But we are not just talking about that single specific opponent but other users as well. How would it feel if 2 players are vying for the title with one player honestly playing his players with proper tactics in the friendlies but the other guy using the corner tactic and thus avoiding injuries which eventually would give him the title? Either play a friendly with proper tactic or simply don't play a friendly if you don't want to injure your players. That's how it should be.
second this is not cheating how you will prove the intonations of user maybe he wanted to win this way
on top ive seen 3 injuries in safe tactics as well ...
If this is cheating then any good tactics that wins is cheating as well cause its exploits the weakens of sokker ..
When a random factor is applied to all, it ceases to be unequal to everyone. This is clear cut cheating however you try to justify it.
@slavista: It is the problem on the game side, not on the user side.
Maybe DEVs can reduce the frequency/duration of injuries but regardless, these tactics should stop.
@dasanchez86: I don't use it, but there is no advantage when everyone can choose that approach... I can't see why is not fair play, though.
If one team plays against other team using the corners, there would be also a reduced probability of injuries for both teams.
But we are not just talking about that single specific opponent but other users as well. How would it feel if 2 players are vying for the title with one player honestly playing his players with proper tactics in the friendlies but the other guy using the corner tactic and thus avoiding injuries which eventually would give him the title? Either play a friendly with proper tactic or simply don't play a friendly if you don't want to injure your players. That's how it should be.
Hmmm... tou try to joke and to be sarcistic or do you really mean what u are writting ?
Btw I am not sure the corner tactic really reduces the injuries but to check.
Btw I am not sure the corner tactic really reduces the injuries but to check.
I thought that we are all just trolling and being sarcastic in this topic
50 days injurie
https://sokker.org/player/PID/35589608
well if you have this few times you will start play safe in official games as well ...
https://sokker.org/player/PID/35589608
well if you have this few times you will start play safe in official games as well ...
@KautukP how many years you think will be needed random to hit equal all users with this injury and compensate this guy ? and as i said there is no way to predict if same user will not be hit from other injuries next game. Hope you got our point i do not care about cups and championships cause its obvious i cannot compete with 10 ratings more in long term especially with injuries but i care for my trainees and for a lot of users training update is one of the reason stay in sokker not sleeping to see pop ups :)