Subpage under development, new version coming soon!
Subject: »[info]Dev Diary #82: Automatic release of NT-players from
Unfortunately, we are used to them now. An ordinary day in Sokker
An ordinary day in Sokker
wordgame...
ordinateur is french for computer...
*speechless*
wordgame...
ordinateur is french for computer...
*speechless*
I have a question:
Lets say i have Pace set up for DEF and i also have Pace set for ATT, if a player of mine plays 90 mins Friendly on friday at DEF order, and then on Sunday plays a official match for 22 mins on ATT order, will those minutes add up, since the same skill (Pace) is being trained?
Lets say i have Pace set up for DEF and i also have Pace set for ATT, if a player of mine plays 90 mins Friendly on friday at DEF order, and then on Sunday plays a official match for 22 mins on ATT order, will those minutes add up, since the same skill (Pace) is being trained?
No. Only minutes counts from formation which player has set up in training tab. If you choose for him def - 90 minutes of friendly counts. If you choose for him att - only 22 minutes counts from sunday.
i have a player who played in fridays macth,but he isnt get traning
He isnt signed to same formation as one he played with in friendly game.
For example, in training he would have DEF, but he played as MID in match.
For example, in training he would have DEF, but he played as MID in match.
Look my friendly game pls
its huge bug. i have number 1 gk and Number 5 played as gk?
How its possible?
i burn training because of this bug
its huge bug. i have number 1 gk and Number 5 played as gk?
How its possible?
i burn training because of this bug
Lol how they managed to achieve this super weird
I saw sth like this earlier
You have set 10 players in starting formation and one guy on the bench with gk order?
You have set 10 players in starting formation and one guy on the bench with gk order?
He must be play as def or mid command why he played as gk?
gk is just kind of different match-order in comparison to all other 3, it seems to be unchanging - when def gets injury and there is no def on the bench then mid/att will replace him but will get order def, when gk is injured he might be replaced only by gk and when he comes on the pitch from the bench he will always be gk no matter if he replaced gk/def/mid or att
I think it always worked that way. Wrong way, hence bug but not with high priority. Wouldn't expect it fixed soon, just don't play that way :P
I think it always worked that way. Wrong way, hence bug but not with high priority. Wouldn't expect it fixed soon, just don't play that way :P
i didn't pick a player in reserve in such situations, but this time I forgot about the goalkeeper. its not important for me now because its friendly game but this must fix
the real impact here is that gk with no. 1 wont receive training from that game due to exceeding number of allowed players with gk order