Subpage under development, new version coming soon!
Subject: »[info]Dev Diary #82: Automatic release of NT-players from
- there will be no friendly matches the day playoffs matches take place
no, I don't think so. They said, warm-up matches aren't needed because there are 3 matches in that week, enough for full training. And three matches means that there has to be a friendly match on playoff sunday.
no, I don't think so. They said, warm-up matches aren't needed because there are 3 matches in that week, enough for full training. And three matches means that there has to be a friendly match on playoff sunday.
There are teams who pull magical/unerathly juniors all the time and there are teams which haven't had a single one.
That kind of random is broken random XD
That's how randomness works (when expected number of good rolls is low over some period of time*).
If you want better distribution of juniors between teams (and injuries, and cards, and whatever else you want) then of course it's possible to implement, but it won't be random.
*What I mean here is that if you have, for example, 2% of chance to get top junior each week then in 100 weeks ~13-14% of teams will get 0 top juniors, and ~13-14% of teams will get at least 4 top juniors. But if you do it over much longer period of time it's much better distribution, for example over 10000 weeks you can expect that ~99.9% of teams will get between 150 and 250 top juniors, and ~86% of teams will get between 180 and 220 top juniors.
Unfortunately we don't have 200 years to live :P
That kind of random is broken random XD
That's how randomness works (when expected number of good rolls is low over some period of time*).
If you want better distribution of juniors between teams (and injuries, and cards, and whatever else you want) then of course it's possible to implement, but it won't be random.
*What I mean here is that if you have, for example, 2% of chance to get top junior each week then in 100 weeks ~13-14% of teams will get 0 top juniors, and ~13-14% of teams will get at least 4 top juniors. But if you do it over much longer period of time it's much better distribution, for example over 10000 weeks you can expect that ~99.9% of teams will get between 150 and 250 top juniors, and ~86% of teams will get between 180 and 220 top juniors.
Unfortunately we don't have 200 years to live :P
normal friendly. Warm-up friendly was only in play-off sunday.
they were introduced as match type for all friendlies during season break, check Dev Diaries 8 and 62
they were introduced as match type for all friendlies during season break, check Dev Diaries 8 and 62
Just look at training report.
Friday friendly counted as friendly
Sunday friendly counted as official (this is what I understand as warm-up type)
Wednesday friendly counted as friendly.
Starting this week and every season-break in future minutes from each friendly (friday, sunday, wednesday) will count as normal friendly. This is how I understand last announcement. Only playing in play-off game you will get official minutes at sunday.
Friday friendly counted as friendly
Sunday friendly counted as official (this is what I understand as warm-up type)
Wednesday friendly counted as friendly.
Starting this week and every season-break in future minutes from each friendly (friday, sunday, wednesday) will count as normal friendly. This is how I understand last announcement. Only playing in play-off game you will get official minutes at sunday.
probably you are right. I tried to say that in the past, warm-up was promised not only for playoff day, but for all sunday and wednesday matches during season break, so they take back more than 1 training bonus. And they come back to a situation where playoff teams have a little training advantage.
Not every, I think that the matches called warm-up matches were only two matches played on Sunday/Wednesday during the last week of the season.
But it doesn't matter. You are probably right and the training advantage for playing play-offs is so small that from my point of view it might be even called insignificant.
Even playing 3 friendlies instead of two might turn out to be more risky than profitable.
But it doesn't matter. You are probably right and the training advantage for playing play-offs is so small that from my point of view it might be even called insignificant.
Even playing 3 friendlies instead of two might turn out to be more risky than profitable.
How would that change anything? It would still be random, doesn't matter if a team has it's own seed for pseudo random number generator.
It would mean that all teams would have exactly the same chance of "luck", spread in time. The randomness would be normalized.
It would mean that all teams would have exactly the same chance of "luck", spread in time. The randomness would be normalized.
this is for the principle of equity : NO advantage must be done at any team
the advantages of the Play off are not insignificant :
this is training 90% efficient
xp for players
Money for the recipe of the match.
By example a playoff match in France can bring 840 000€ even if you shared 420 000€ for each team , and you find this insignificant?
the advantages of the Play off are not insignificant :
this is training 90% efficient
xp for players
Money for the recipe of the match.
By example a playoff match in France can bring 840 000€ even if you shared 420 000€ for each team , and you find this insignificant?
xD
just a quick questions:
- what happens with supporters mood when a team looses his Play off game? and what would be the consequences?
- what happens with mood if a team looses Friendly?
- a team wich lose will play in lower league, with lower sponsor payments and income from stadium?
- a team which lose friendly does any impact on sponsors or future stadium income?
Mate what are u speaking about?
Official match is offical match, friendly is friendly.
Stop this, u're clearly wrong now.
Also WTF is this? NO advantage must be done at any team Are u leaving in perfect world of Clarom?
We're different and we fight for prizes! So again - no prizes fir the winners? Cause it would be an advantage?
...
just a quick questions:
- what happens with supporters mood when a team looses his Play off game? and what would be the consequences?
- what happens with mood if a team looses Friendly?
- a team wich lose will play in lower league, with lower sponsor payments and income from stadium?
- a team which lose friendly does any impact on sponsors or future stadium income?
Mate what are u speaking about?
Official match is offical match, friendly is friendly.
Stop this, u're clearly wrong now.
Also WTF is this? NO advantage must be done at any team Are u leaving in perfect world of Clarom?
We're different and we fight for prizes! So again - no prizes fir the winners? Cause it would be an advantage?
...
don't mix all
a perfect world doesn't exist but that's no reason why we cannot improve it
a perfect world doesn't exist but that's no reason why we cannot improve it
Well, you can aim to play PO match every season if you like :D
I'd say warm up matches are next week's Sunday and Wednesday matches, because they come before the Cup and League start.
Thus they are called the warm up ones.
What does the Announcement about play-off week Sunday's match efficiency says in Polish?
I wrote on int forum that it might be a translation issue and for sure it was.
Thus they are called the warm up ones.
What does the Announcement about play-off week Sunday's match efficiency says in Polish?
I wrote on int forum that it might be a translation issue and for sure it was.
It said, that Sunday's friendly match was treated as an official one. But starting from next season, this will be no longer case. Matches in upcoming week (Friday, Sunday and Wednesday) will be treated as a friendly
But don't take my word as granted. Few of last DD in Polish were also written poorly, so there may be some unexpected changes :D
Can we do something about the "not expiring" notifications? Its pretty annoying.
Thanx
Thanx