Azərbaycan dili Bahasa Indonesia Bosanski Català Čeština Dansk Deutsch Eesti English Español Français Galego Hrvatski Italiano Latviešu Lietuvių Magyar Malti Mакедонски Nederlands Norsk Polski Português Português BR Românã Slovenčina Srpski Suomi Svenska Tiếng Việt Türkçe Ελληνικά Български Русский Українська Հայերեն ქართული ენა 中文
Subpage under development, new version coming soon!

Subject: »[info]Dev Diary #82: Automatic release of NT-players from

2022-11-18 09:55:40
Thx sokker and goodby forever.
2022-11-18 16:54:10
sad to see dedicated users with many years in sokker to leave :( its good to have their feedback just because if say the reasons @borkos007 and devs will ignore it
2022-11-18 18:50:56
Game itself is interesting, basics should stay without changes. Of course some things could be improved, 1st of all gamplay interface + mobile version + running with ball out of the field, corners and penalties, should be way more sofisticated, maybe, i said maybe making it more realistic with subs number to be increased, les realistic, with injuries (as it is after all an online game for fun) Youth system seems to be very bugged, i don't even dive into.

Other than that, tactics should remain, player skills as well.

Regarding training, it would be nice that MID formation players could gain DEF training, these small things already could make the game much better.

But basics should stay, training speed, injuries to be reviewed again, im repeating myself, seemingly it's a problem. NT injuries and visibility for NT coaches should be available, as they are elected by sokker people... Yeah, a lot to improve regarding coding but correct me or add anything if i missed something. Financials ... hmm we can adapt and money flow anyways gets adjusted... you just need to learn how to swim in new conditions.

Have a nice evening :D
2022-11-19 17:49:31
We have noticed in Colombia. Some users belive in formation training can reach same levels of % as advanced training, but with more playing time.

Those % in formation training are creating confussion and people is buying young players beliving they are getting also full training on formation Training.

This needs to be more intuitive. Not everybody knows how to navigate throug the latest news, not all people understand english, not all the people understand the same from reading, not all the people have enough time.
2022-11-20 02:20:33
You are right. There is no help to be found in the outdated rules section, and even the training page itself, which actually have clickable info-sections, offers no clear information on the matter. The flawed News/Pressroom section is, of course, too messy to be of use for new visitors.

And this is just one example.

I get that other tasks had to be carried out first, but updating information to users about how to actually play the current game is a task which is long, long overdue by this time.
2022-11-20 10:07:40
This could / can be done at any time, by linguists and / or admins, but they need the approval of the devs. As said numerous times before. There has to be a spokesperson between both groups ( devs and users ) and that spokesperson should be in direct link to both groups. It has been ages since I saw that spokesperson on forum and I'm not talking about Raul here.
These things should be taken care of asap.
There's no need for devs to make lots of time for this matter. Let the linguists and admins take care of the problem. They are the closest and fastest solution for this.
2022-11-20 10:42:52
but this so-called spokeperson has no point in existence if he/she would have to wait month/months or at least weeks to get info from Raul/devs
2022-11-20 11:10:25
You're talking about strus right? :P
2022-11-20 12:47:08
True. In order to assure correct information for all users, there has to be a reliable source for translation, which needs to be validated by devs.

It is only natural that the source material be written in english, so what we really need is a person on the inside who understands english and polish very well, and who actually has access to the correct information and the way devs want to present it.

If it is true what mauser said, that the english language doesn't have its own, active linguist, it is really weird.
2022-11-20 22:02:50
You're talking about strus right? :P

Yes... But indeed the problem as kryminator said is a fact.
That's why we need someone like elmomo talked about.
But the devs need to realise that information and communication is key to succes.
The way things are happening right now are doubtfull to state it positively.
2022-11-20 23:17:29
I think we communicate and we fail!
We talk so long about the new pages and how they look,insteed to tell them,
there is nothing wrong with the pages..the game need to update.

And the game is the viewer the ME and the tactical part.
The rest follows.
2022-11-21 19:44:37
And the game is the viewer the ME and the tactical part.
The rest follows.


Yes! Agree with that.
But also many of us will appreciate if they actual ME and 2d viewer also remains (as an option) for the many.

In the so far away future, when they changed the ME and tactical to improve them..and they work right..
Then we can talk about "Change viewer and ME"... its not an easy job to do.
You have TO PLAY AND KNOW about the game to make it right... And i dont know for sure if the devs has that.

IMHO
2022-11-21 19:45:57
And if you make a mess in ME, viewer or tactical, the game will be ruined.

: S
2022-11-21 21:16:17
And the game is the viewer the ME and the tactical part.
The rest follows.


Still I believe their work order was / is the right one. But they know too little and have too little time to make it work as they had forseen it.
And because it takes so long, the work order feels corrupted.
Let's just hope they allow users to help wherever they can to speed things up and to improve pieces that needs improvement, aside from the ME, tactics engine and match viewer, which is and will be the last part they will adjust.
But bug fixing, user friendly adjustments, NT becoming a true part of the game, injury adjustment,... and most importantly, communication... it's all in call for help from users, if possible.
2022-11-27 01:10:51
Mozart Caldas 18 average [5] outfield 32 Reject

This week, four players got into my YS, all of them 18 y.o. This one above was the "less-worst"...

Suggestions to the YS reform: admit only players with 16/17 y.o. and maximum number of weeks to go = 20 (or less...). Even if they wait too long, few players would get promoted of YS with maximum age of 19.

Hope devs consider this...
2022-11-27 14:19:16
Think it’s unlikely myself. The rng is designed to limit top players and to not flood the market of good prospects so whilst it may be frustrating from a personal view point at times, it’s kind of necessary. If you forced it to be 16/17yo then talent would be altered so that it’s harder to get better talents then now. I could be wrong but I doubt it.

I’d like to instead see the max number of weeks in a school come down instead so that players can’t come out 21 because of the shortened season.