Subject: »[info]Dev Diary #82: Automatic release of NT-players from

Think it’s unlikely myself. The rng is designed to limit top players and to not flood the market of good prospects so whilst it may be frustrating from a personal view point at times, it’s kind of necessary. If you forced it to be 16/17yo then talent would be altered so that it’s harder to get better talents then now. I could be wrong but I doubt it.

I’d like to instead see the max number of weeks in a school come down instead so that players can’t come out 21 because of the shortened season.

I will be happy if they make 20yrs coming from ys somehow better without the excellent ceiling so they are better match to their same age counterparts who were pulled from ys at the younger age

(+115 min)

(+125 min)

+137 min

yep site is really slow this afternoon

One question that I think its was never tried yet:

What's the efficiency of playing 2 full friendly matches in a week? 100% like 2 official matches?

1 friendly = 85%
1 official = 96%
1 official + 1 friendly = 99%
2 officials = 100%

but from this season onwards, according to the Devs Diary report 67, there will be no more bonus to the friendly match played on sundays of relegation matches. So from this season onwards, we would be able to play 2 full friendly matches in the same week.

So my question is, what is the efficiency of:

2 friendly = ?

I have players with 180 minutes of friendlies on 22/09/2022 training, it gave 98% (as is expected, knowing how efficiency calculation works).

Yes but that wad because 1 friendly had 96% because it was calculated as an official match.
If you see what a friendly gives for bonus on top of an official match, I think it's safe to assume the 2nd friendly will give 3% extra on top of the first full friendly match

Yes but that was because 1 friendly had 96% because it was calculated as an official match.
If you see what a friendly gives for bonus on top of an official match, I think it's safe to assume the 2nd friendly will give 3% extra on top of the first full friendly match

Yes but that was because 1 friendly had 96% because it was calculated as an official match.
If you see what a friendly gives for bonus on top of an official match, I think it's safe to assume the 2nd friendly will give 3% extra on top of the first full friendly match

Yes but that was because 1 friendly had 96% because it was calculated as an official match.
If you see what a friendly gives for bonus on top of an official match, I think it's safe to assume the 2nd friendly will give 3% extra on top of the first full friendly match

game is so slow now ...

Yes but that was because 1 friendly had 96% because it was calculated as an official match.

Yes, one friendly match counted as official, but it was one week earlier, and indeed in that week 90 minutes "official" (from a friendly match) and 90 minutes friendly gave 99%. But next week with 2 normal friendly matches it was 98%:


If you see what a friendly gives for bonus on top of an official match, I think it's safe to assume the 2nd friendly will give 3% extra on top of the first full friendly match

Use my formula from this topic - https://sokker.org/forum_topic/ID_forum/63355/ID_topic/3564368/pg/0#new and you will understand why 2 friendlies give 98%.


Edit: Correcting info and screenshot to show both weeks
(edited)

Yes but that was because 1 friendly had 96% because it was calculated as an official match.
If you see what a friendly gives for bonus on top of an official match, I think it's safe to assume the 2nd friendly will give 3% extra on top of the first full friendly match

Yes but that was because 1 friendly had 96% because it was calculated as an official match.
If you see what a friendly gives for bonus on top of an official match, I think it's safe to assume the 2nd friendly will give 3% extra on top of the first full friendly match