Subpage under development, new version coming soon!
Subject: »[info]Dev Diary #82: Automatic release of NT-players from
Middle values for weather are more common than extreme values, it looks like normal distribution when you look at data from all regions
Current weather in 2272 regions (0 is the worst weather, 7 is the best weather):
Many months ago when i first ran my script it was very similar, so I don't think anything was changed with weather algorithm:
Current weather in 2272 regions (0 is the worst weather, 7 is the best weather):
Many months ago when i first ran my script it was very similar, so I don't think anything was changed with weather algorithm:
great new then! I am just having bad luck. Most of "relatively good weather" days above are youth team or arcade matches. No good ticket sales for more than one season for me.
Well, your stadium is badly planned :P All those low price benches are making you lose potential ticket income.
When you have a whole stadium of seats under roof you don't need to worry about the weather.
When you have a whole stadium of seats under roof you don't need to worry about the weather.
After 12 teams/league, average club size for all leagues have been reduced, we all experienced decrease in attendance. Just big countries might remain almost similar.
I have 36400 seats under roof out of 80400 places, but most of my matches leave lots of seats under roof without being sold, therefore, there is no point of blaming lack of seats under roof for low attendances. It doesnt make sense.
Last season I was the best team in all 2nd divisions in my country. but I was not even near of selling all the tickets, not even playing against bigger teams. Im sorry but I can only blame bad weather. If this is bad luck, I can understand, but the explanation is not lack of seats under roof because they should have sold out at least once, but it never happens.
(edited)
(edited)
This week, f.e. I wont meet the spendings/outcomes (and I didnt buy a player, didnt spent on the stadium, etc). I am getting just too few every week. I used to get a lot more 2 seasons ago.
(edited)
(edited)
All your places need to be under a roof.
It will be better.
I did read your explanation, but still all places need to be under a roof.
It will be better.
I did read your explanation, but still all places need to be under a roof.
out of 80400 places
That is the reason why your seats under roof aren't profidable.
You have 50% too much places in your stadium to be profidable.
How many times do you have 60k attendance?
If you would hav 50k places of which 35k seats under roof, your places would be fuller!
There's too little users in your country to have a big amount of attendance.
That is the reason why your seats under roof aren't profidable.
You have 50% too much places in your stadium to be profidable.
How many times do you have 60k attendance?
If you would hav 50k places of which 35k seats under roof, your places would be fuller!
There's too little users in your country to have a big amount of attendance.
I have 36400 seats under roof out of 80400 places, but most of my matches leave lots of seats under roof without being sold, therefore, there is no point of blaming lack of seats under roof for low attendances. It doesnt make sense.
But you get some spectators on your benches, and each spectator who buys a cheap ticket on your benches is one* less spectator who could buy a ticket on seats under roof. These things are connected.
* It could be even worse than one less on seats under roof, depends on how the algorithm is implemented.
Another problem is that you have too much space behind goals and in corners, these ones just pay less than the main ones (along the sides). To get the same attendance on these worse ones as on main ones you need 7:6 price ratio (when your stadium has seats under roof everywhere). That's why I build mine stadium like that, it's just not worth it to have too many seats behind the goal and in corners.
You would get MUCH better income from stadium if it was looking like this:
5k 15k 5k
5k ---- 5k
5k 15k 5k
Of course full of seats under roof.
How many fanclub members do you have?
But you get some spectators on your benches, and each spectator who buys a cheap ticket on your benches is one* less spectator who could buy a ticket on seats under roof. These things are connected.
* It could be even worse than one less on seats under roof, depends on how the algorithm is implemented.
Another problem is that you have too much space behind goals and in corners, these ones just pay less than the main ones (along the sides). To get the same attendance on these worse ones as on main ones you need 7:6 price ratio (when your stadium has seats under roof everywhere). That's why I build mine stadium like that, it's just not worth it to have too many seats behind the goal and in corners.
You would get MUCH better income from stadium if it was looking like this:
5k 15k 5k
5k ---- 5k
5k 15k 5k
Of course full of seats under roof.
How many fanclub members do you have?
I had less. Now I am at the top league of my country
well. I think attendance has decreased because of average fan club member on the league.
1. Attendance depends on weather, but also mood and fanclub size for local and visitor
2. Fanclub members is updated depending on (from rules):
.....Every week the supporter club size will be updated. The amount of supporters that sign up depends on:
........- Club division
........- League prestige <<<<< This must be something like average club member size of leagues
........- Opponent rank
So now, for not huge countries like poland, romania, italia,...... Top division average size migh be drastically reduced.
Meaning your clubsize will try to go for average, of course deviation depends on your team
With less supporters, it means less people will go to the matches, now, your opponent also takes less supporters
1. Attendance depends on weather, but also mood and fanclub size for local and visitor
2. Fanclub members is updated depending on (from rules):
.....Every week the supporter club size will be updated. The amount of supporters that sign up depends on:
........- Club division
........- League prestige <<<<< This must be something like average club member size of leagues
........- Opponent rank
So now, for not huge countries like poland, romania, italia,...... Top division average size migh be drastically reduced.
Meaning your clubsize will try to go for average, of course deviation depends on your team
With less supporters, it means less people will go to the matches, now, your opponent also takes less supporters
No, League prestige is not average size of club members.
As per my understanding League Prestige is entirely related to the amount of levels of each country. So right now Ekstraklasa is clearly the one with better league prestige because its at the top of a 6 level league.
The 2nd divisions of Poland and the Serie A and Liga I from Romania should be the 2nd bests in league prestige, because they are 2nd of a 6 level legue or first in a 5 levels league.
That is what I always understood and I think it has always been unfair with users from smaller communities, but thats how I was told it works.
As per my understanding League Prestige is entirely related to the amount of levels of each country. So right now Ekstraklasa is clearly the one with better league prestige because its at the top of a 6 level league.
The 2nd divisions of Poland and the Serie A and Liga I from Romania should be the 2nd bests in league prestige, because they are 2nd of a 6 level legue or first in a 5 levels league.
That is what I always understood and I think it has always been unfair with users from smaller communities, but thats how I was told it works.