Subpage under development, new version coming soon!
Subject: »[info]Dev Diary #82: Automatic release of NT-players from
Yes, ME is also on the list - but we cant fix all things at once.
That element will be investigated - you are right, game should display accurate lenght of injury, it can be like day or two different from starting estimation, but with old players it is wrong now. We will check it.
Is there really much to check? Mikoos presented his data about injuries from which one can read that there is fixed number how fast the injury heals per day with age and IIRC it is less than one from 22 yo, probably about 0.5 for 35 (dont remember the exact data). Just dont heal the injury with some randomness or worsening it with age, show the exact number of days left. I dont see the purpose of the current mechanism of worsening healing speed with age or any kind of randomness involved as well. Not in that matter. I mean, it is closer to reality, but I dont think that it has to be.
Is there really much to check? Mikoos presented his data about injuries from which one can read that there is fixed number how fast the injury heals per day with age and IIRC it is less than one from 22 yo, probably about 0.5 for 35 (dont remember the exact data). Just dont heal the injury with some randomness or worsening it with age, show the exact number of days left. I dont see the purpose of the current mechanism of worsening healing speed with age or any kind of randomness involved as well. Not in that matter. I mean, it is closer to reality, but I dont think that it has to be.
we will try to give some tools to make youth school a bit easier to be managed, like for example new options to look at skills and potential of junior, not just to wait for skill drawing after half of the year - you should be able to recognize potential star a bit faster, than in the end of his training - that is rather our approach than producing better players.
that is a totally useless change
what's the purpose of it? most people have problems with having at least 10 decent youths in their ys
it's really not hard to recognise who will be a decent youth and who won't be sold even for 1 euro
that is a totally useless change
what's the purpose of it? most people have problems with having at least 10 decent youths in their ys
it's really not hard to recognise who will be a decent youth and who won't be sold even for 1 euro
We made a lot of global analysing and we are sure - current economy hurts poor clubs the most
please explain your analysis, what made you come to this realisation
because from my point of view inflation helps all small active teams to improve MUCH faster than it was years before and it doesn't hurt them in any way
please explain your analysis, what made you come to this realisation
because from my point of view inflation helps all small active teams to improve MUCH faster than it was years before and it doesn't hurt them in any way
we simply need to change algorithm here.
I agree that it is a bug or just a pointless idea - but it is one of many bugs from the past, we cant left all developement and focus only on bugs.
But right now we paused for a while new pages and layout work, already fixed a lot of different issues, it can be next one for sure, i've added it to our priority list.
I agree that it is a bug or just a pointless idea - but it is one of many bugs from the past, we cant left all developement and focus only on bugs.
But right now we paused for a while new pages and layout work, already fixed a lot of different issues, it can be next one for sure, i've added it to our priority list.
top ranking clubs av. seasonal balance = 7m euro + per year.
mid ranking clubs = 2-3m euro + per yer
new teams or low div teams = less than 1m euro per year.
direct data from the game.
Nothing surprising, we changed number of games, so top teams with most fanbase and biggest stadiums benefit the most.
mid ranking clubs = 2-3m euro + per yer
new teams or low div teams = less than 1m euro per year.
direct data from the game.
Nothing surprising, we changed number of games, so top teams with most fanbase and biggest stadiums benefit the most.
youth school will be changed for sure, but ideas like even younger player or better are no solution
I wasn't talking about younger or better... simply MORE! Usefull players! not top players. The new youth players already being 18 is a joke now. They are always too old, 100% of them is useless. And the amount of players being 18 is like 1/3th of the total amount of new youth players a team gets.
If you could change that into 40/60 f.e. in 16 and 17y old players, we take a huge step in the good direction.
I wasn't talking about younger or better... simply MORE! Usefull players! not top players. The new youth players already being 18 is a joke now. They are always too old, 100% of them is useless. And the amount of players being 18 is like 1/3th of the total amount of new youth players a team gets.
If you could change that into 40/60 f.e. in 16 and 17y old players, we take a huge step in the good direction.
it's just simple data, not an analysis...
all of this money goes down the system via transfers
the effect is that new/small clubs are now able to make more money much faster = they are able to improve much faster by being able to pay for stadium improvement, better staff, opening youth school etc.
small/new teams don't compete against richest teams so it's not a concern for them, they actually feed on middle teams and middle teams feed on rich teams...
all of this money goes down the system via transfers
the effect is that new/small clubs are now able to make more money much faster = they are able to improve much faster by being able to pay for stadium improvement, better staff, opening youth school etc.
small/new teams don't compete against richest teams so it's not a concern for them, they actually feed on middle teams and middle teams feed on rich teams...
It means YOUNGER and BETTER.
Even more juniors is still - BETTER OUTPUT in the end.
There is enough good players in sokker.
Youth school problem is randomness and no option to manage it in anyway but luck, not the level of outcome.
Even more juniors is still - BETTER OUTPUT in the end.
There is enough good players in sokker.
Youth school problem is randomness and no option to manage it in anyway but luck, not the level of outcome.
I agree that it is a bug or just a pointless idea - but it is one of many bugs from the past, we cant left all developement and focus only on bugs.
Give me that damn code and I'll fix the algorithm in 15 minutes... where 10 minutes will be learning php (I guess it's written in that) :P
Give me that damn code and I'll fix the algorithm in 15 minutes... where 10 minutes will be learning php (I guess it's written in that) :P
Better than useless is indeed better.
But it cannot be the purpose for managers to sack 80% of their youth team beforehand, simply because they are not good enough to begin with and / or will never be good enough...
These players need to be filtered out before they come in the youth team. I rather have 1 player in 5 weeks that I know I can train, than 25 of which I not know I can train 1 of them in the end.
But it cannot be the purpose for managers to sack 80% of their youth team beforehand, simply because they are not good enough to begin with and / or will never be good enough...
These players need to be filtered out before they come in the youth team. I rather have 1 player in 5 weeks that I know I can train, than 25 of which I not know I can train 1 of them in the end.
40% of club incomes stays after season. only 60% is consumed by costs. Cant stay that way, arguing on that is pointless.
Big clubs benefit more than poor ones. No idea how you want to explain, that this fact helps poor ones to grow.
Via transfers? sure, lets promote DT even more.
At the start game economy should help you to develop. When you are close to the top, it should be difficult. Your balance should be close to 0, and game should be harder.
Big clubs benefit more than poor ones. No idea how you want to explain, that this fact helps poor ones to grow.
Via transfers? sure, lets promote DT even more.
At the start game economy should help you to develop. When you are close to the top, it should be difficult. Your balance should be close to 0, and game should be harder.
this is a chance, this is an opportunity. This man (Mikoos ) , mega brain, he will definitely be able to help you, the developers!
I wasn't talking about younger or better... simply MORE! Usefull players! not top players.
You don't realise that it doesn't matter how good you make an average youth player, users will always be interested in only top few % of youth players? When 50 youth players come to each youth school each season, and you only need about 1-2 youths per season to replace old players. The rest of youth players will be declared useless by market, there is simply not enough place for them in clubs.
You don't realise that it doesn't matter how good you make an average youth player, users will always be interested in only top few % of youth players? When 50 youth players come to each youth school each season, and you only need about 1-2 youths per season to replace old players. The rest of youth players will be declared useless by market, there is simply not enough place for them in clubs.
you need to learn php to find and change mathematical formula from something dependent on age to just "1"? I dont think learning any language is necessary in that case, common sense is enough
it might be sql though, like... you know, some kind of daily job checking and updating injury days of injured players according to some formula
it might be sql though, like... you know, some kind of daily job checking and updating injury days of injured players according to some formula