Subpage under development, new version coming soon!
Subject: »[info]Dev Diary #82: Automatic release of NT-players from
Believing on the visualization, that I’m not 100% sure
The attacker goes to the same zone that the goalie… this is an active use of the position…
And the none intentional pass, does not change that fact…
IMO offside, since the beginning he does not allow the goalie to get the ball, so participates in that particular situation
The attacker goes to the same zone that the goalie… this is an active use of the position…
And the none intentional pass, does not change that fact…
IMO offside, since the beginning he does not allow the goalie to get the ball, so participates in that particular situation
national cup trophies are also missing?
and the "1 of 6" numbering is wrong, it counts to the first cup of the last view, so there are 2 more
and the "1 of 6" numbering is wrong, it counts to the first cup of the last view, so there are 2 more
For the angrybene's images:
@Raul, tell your devs that it's not that hard to check if everything looks ok on all resolutions, you don't need all the mobile phones to check it :P
For example Ctrl+Shift+M in firefox and change resolution there
https://streamable.com/6s1xap
The equivalent width of my Samsung S10 phone is about 414 pixels in desktop firefox.
For angrybene's phone the equivalent would be about 360 pixels.
Make sure it looks nice for these resolutions, preferably even lower ones.
(edited)
@Raul, tell your devs that it's not that hard to check if everything looks ok on all resolutions, you don't need all the mobile phones to check it :P
For example Ctrl+Shift+M in firefox and change resolution there
https://streamable.com/6s1xap
The equivalent width of my Samsung S10 phone is about 414 pixels in desktop firefox.
For angrybene's phone the equivalent would be about 360 pixels.
Make sure it looks nice for these resolutions, preferably even lower ones.
(edited)
And about bugs, "Avg. team marks:" is not average team marks, currently it's average team form in scale of 0-100 :P
Also, this
Also, this
Can you please increase the number of spots on the bench to 7 or more
it is on the list, we just need more time for it.
it is on the list, we just need more time for it.
club page is the main page if you visit other clubs, overview is the main page if you visit your own club - I guess? So if i check other clubs, I'm usually interested in their last and previous matches, I would place them more in the top of the page.
So, the best place is after guest book then? or even before? if before, you will see last games on PC from the start when you visit some club, but to leave a comment or see a comment of your own club you will need to scroll - but im not sure how important for you is guestbook, for mi it is minnor thing.
So, the best place is after guest book then? or even before? if before, you will see last games on PC from the start when you visit some club, but to leave a comment or see a comment of your own club you will need to scroll - but im not sure how important for you is guestbook, for mi it is minnor thing.
I hope you also notice, that the people here, who help reporting bugs, are also the ones who care about this game and it's future.
They might also be the ones who want to shorten max injury time a little, just to make it as it was before reform, in regards to competitive games
They might also be the ones who want to shorten max injury time a little, just to make it as it was before reform, in regards to competitive games
Guestbook is a minor thing indeed
Rarely used. Back in 2006 guestbooks were all the rave, now, not so much
(edited)
Rarely used. Back in 2006 guestbooks were all the rave, now, not so much
(edited)
Agree, it was mentioned that we probably change current rules of skill drops, currently it starts to early, but it is becouse there is no retirement in sokker - some players are usefull even in the age of 38/39, and fine - but if we will start skill drops from age 33/34, then we will meet good players at age 40+. so sure, we will change that in the future, but it need to be combined with some new mechanism of player retirement.
I think that players should retire when they become really weaker than in their prime time (for example - player is 30% worse than it was before, he thinks that it is time to end his career).
I think that players should retire when they become really weaker than in their prime time (for example - player is 30% worse than it was before, he thinks that it is time to end his career).
You don't need player retirement mechanism. Just make the drops big enough at age 36+ so players at 40+ are not worth much money.
Blue line is current "average weekly value lost by player because of sunday (well, now thursday) drops", change it to something like the red line and it will be fine.
(edited)
Blue line is current "average weekly value lost by player because of sunday (well, now thursday) drops", change it to something like the red line and it will be fine.
(edited)