Subject: »[info]Dev Diary #82: Automatic release of NT-players from

Yep refresh studio is just what the performance of the site needs :)

I also would oppose to player retirement as players if they loose their skills suddenly at the age of 36 is better option in my opinion

so +1 to Mikoos

Yes, especially if there is no hall of Fame thing yet, i don't want to lose all my epic players

10 Advanced training slots is not realistic regarding player training compared to RL.

Why not implement something like higher your head coach level and assistants will give you additional slots for advanced training.

Like that money flows out of the game if players invest into better coaches or assistants --> or rename it infrastructure with levels for training grounds or whatever. Higher the training infrastructure more players can get quality training as in RL if we want to keep it near to RL football.

Shortly speaking:

Currently 10 advanced training slots.

Maybe with basic infrastructure level it should be like 5 slots and more managers improve their training infrastructure, more they spend money and more advanced training slots become available.

I don't know if this is the right place, but I can't remove transfer announcement.

Error:

Oops! An Error Occurred
The server returned a "500 Internal Server Error".
Something is broken. Please let us know what you were doing when this error occurred. We will fix it as soon as possible. Sorry for any inconvenience caused.

Thanks, we will check it

10 slots is optimal. Yes, it is not realistic, but it was an average number of trainees in sokker from the beggining of a game and it was well balanced. We wont change that. :)

Average? :P

Wouldn't the average be more like this?

22 pace trainees
Unlimited stamina
10 def
6 striker
10 passing
10 playmaker
10 tech
2 keeper

(22+ 999 + 10 + 6 + 10 + 10 + 10 + 2)/8 = 133,7 spots

:P

But if we would leave out stamina it would be: exactly 10 spots

So yeah, seems fair
(edited)

yep, leave stamina :) lets count "serious" skills only ;)

But if you like averages so much.
Why not take the average lost competitive games due to injury, from before the reform?
And apply that average to the average lost competitive games since reform?

I bet mikoos can provide some statistics about these averages?


Sorry, it only seems fair to ask this (again)
(edited)

Sometimes you say we want realistic now you dont want. its funny...

In my opinion the game shouldn't be realistic in the broad sense.

It should be realistic to apply the current competition rules of football.
Offside, VAR (maybe a nice addition in the match report), 5 substitutes, more players on the bench, etc

But when it comes to the manager part of the game, it should be more game than realism.
This includes training, transfers, etc

It is a game, man… sometimes being realistic can help, sometimes not. If we want to be realistic we should make top teams rewarded the most and make sure that no local, small team will ever jump into premier league, it is impossible in reality. If sokker training system is something you dont like, so why are you playing in it? It is almost the same as it was all the time.

Much more funny is, that all your comments are oriented on personal benefits not the game itself.

Wow... Game owner tell me why i am playing sokker... i love this game many times more than you do, you can understand this from the time I spent in the game. unfortunately you ignore the real shortcomings of the game and do not like the useless updates, but I love this game so I continue. Let's see what else raul can do, I wonder.

:)

I hope you will prove me wrong and do something nice I really want it. I have only one request from you, please give some attention to the requests of the users. Good lucks