Subpage under development, new version coming soon!
Subject: »[update] Improve tactics
[idea] Tactic auto-build
There should be an option to build the entire tactic based on the formation for the center square.
So, after you click on "build", all squares would get the same formation as the center square, but adjusted, e.g. all players would be pushed to the left for the squares left of the center.
You would still have to make some extra adjustments, but making a tactic would take less time.
There should be an option to build the entire tactic based on the formation for the center square.
So, after you click on "build", all squares would get the same formation as the center square, but adjusted, e.g. all players would be pushed to the left for the squares left of the center.
You would still have to make some extra adjustments, but making a tactic would take less time.
I think there could be a feature (may be only for plus users) where one could copy (steal) tactics from a specific game... it would be an advantage, but it would bring some complexity.
never this will be pay to win also against auto build option
making tactics is something gives option to advance faster ifyou are not good in other aspects so should not be changes
making tactics is something gives option to advance faster ifyou are not good in other aspects so should not be changes
well at least there should be then some default tactics that you can use in matches because those that are default right now i don't think any1 have ever used after they discovered that you can make your own...
never this will be pay to win also against auto build option
I know it could be seen as that, but copying a tactic from other team doesn't imply you are going to win (I see success in sokker games as a combination of both tactic + players, and without the specific players on each position, a tactic may be either a leverage or an anchor) and as I said, it will bring more complexity to the tactics as long as you would need to change more often in order to not be out-dated. I understand your concern.
I know it could be seen as that, but copying a tactic from other team doesn't imply you are going to win (I see success in sokker games as a combination of both tactic + players, and without the specific players on each position, a tactic may be either a leverage or an anchor) and as I said, it will bring more complexity to the tactics as long as you would need to change more often in order to not be out-dated. I understand your concern.
If they were useful we would all play the same way. I think it's better to impulse the use of our own tactics by making their composition as easy as possible
If they were useful we would all play the same way. I think it's better to impulse the use of our own tactics by making their composition as easy as possible
well, that is relatively true... but i see the point anyway
well, that is relatively true... but i see the point anyway
I make my tactic and then I tweak it for months, and you would let somebody to just copy that... No.
Plus or not, no.
Plus or not, no.
+1 , fantastic idea
The tactics are a great addition to this game , but is extremely time consuming making a new tactic sometimes
The tactics are a great addition to this game , but is extremely time consuming making a new tactic sometimes
I dont knwo if was mentioned before, but i would like the option to move the players based on "our team owns the ball" and "the other team owns the ball", that would help for situations like free kicks, corner, etc.
(edited)
(edited)
No.
It would complicate the game, and if you give people separate def/att tactics, most managers would make some impossible tactics. And after the tactics fail, they would get discouraged from playing.
It would complicate the game, and if you give people separate def/att tactics, most managers would make some impossible tactics. And after the tactics fail, they would get discouraged from playing.
1 Davor Jagar GK
2 George Mădălin Boca DEF
3 Péter Náray DEF
4 Matt Weddle DEF
5 Feliks Siestrzewitowski DEF
6 Taimo Tegu DEF
7 Fănică Băcanu MID
...
1' red card or no player Péter Náray on position 2
1' red card or no player George Mădălin Boca on position 3
1' red card or no player Fănică Băcanu on position 4
1' red card or no player Matt Weddle on position 5
1' red card or no player Matt Weddle on position 6
those are CO in arcade today. No. 6 got red card and CO was activated and No. 4 filled position of No. 6 but then CO was not activated that Băcanu fill that place because after that there was no player on place of No. 4.
there should be option to tick in or out for this situation too....
2 George Mădălin Boca DEF
3 Péter Náray DEF
4 Matt Weddle DEF
5 Feliks Siestrzewitowski DEF
6 Taimo Tegu DEF
7 Fănică Băcanu MID
...
1' red card or no player Péter Náray on position 2
1' red card or no player George Mădălin Boca on position 3
1' red card or no player Fănică Băcanu on position 4
1' red card or no player Matt Weddle on position 5
1' red card or no player Matt Weddle on position 6
those are CO in arcade today. No. 6 got red card and CO was activated and No. 4 filled position of No. 6 but then CO was not activated that Băcanu fill that place because after that there was no player on place of No. 4.
there should be option to tick in or out for this situation too....
You can't do this because of the way it works under the hood.
It's a weird system.
When you send a player to a different position, you are not really sending the player there, you swapping positions, 4 became 6, and 6 became 4.
So, Matt Weddle never became "position 6 player." Position 4 and position 6 swapped places, and Matt Weddle remained a position 4 player, and that is why Fănică Băcanu never filled in the the gap in the defense, because the gap was position 6 after the swap.
Before the swap:
1 Davor Jagar GK
2 George Mădălin Boca DEF
3 Péter Náray DEF
4 Matt Weddle DEF
5 Feliks Siestrzewitowski DEF
6 No player DEF
7 Fănică Băcanu MID
After the swap:
1 Davor Jagar GK
2 George Mădălin Boca DEF
3 Péter Náray DEF
6 No player DEF
5 Feliks Siestrzewitowski DEF
4 Matt Weddle DEF
7 Fănică Băcanu MID
I think it works like this because of the training system. Since the training system is gonna change, maybe this will as well. I think they even said that they are gonna improve these things.
(edited)
It's a weird system.
When you send a player to a different position, you are not really sending the player there, you swapping positions, 4 became 6, and 6 became 4.
So, Matt Weddle never became "position 6 player." Position 4 and position 6 swapped places, and Matt Weddle remained a position 4 player, and that is why Fănică Băcanu never filled in the the gap in the defense, because the gap was position 6 after the swap.
Before the swap:
1 Davor Jagar GK
2 George Mădălin Boca DEF
3 Péter Náray DEF
4 Matt Weddle DEF
5 Feliks Siestrzewitowski DEF
6 No player DEF
7 Fănică Băcanu MID
After the swap:
1 Davor Jagar GK
2 George Mădălin Boca DEF
3 Péter Náray DEF
6 No player DEF
5 Feliks Siestrzewitowski DEF
4 Matt Weddle DEF
7 Fănică Băcanu MID
I think it works like this because of the training system. Since the training system is gonna change, maybe this will as well. I think they even said that they are gonna improve these things.
(edited)