Azərbaycan dili Bahasa Indonesia Bosanski Català Čeština Dansk Deutsch Eesti English Español Français Galego Hrvatski Italiano Latviešu Lietuvių Magyar Malti Mакедонски Nederlands Norsk Polski Português Português BR Românã Slovenčina Srpski Suomi Svenska Tiếng Việt Türkçe Ελληνικά Български Русский Українська Հայերեն ქართული ენა 中文
Subpage under development, new version coming soon!

Subject: »[info]Dev Diary #82: Automatic release of NT-players from

2022-05-05 23:10:17
I see nothing in this screenshot, it's 180x180px
2022-05-05 23:14:03
i fix it now, as you can see he popped on 16 pace after only 5 weeks, so his talent is pretty good
2022-05-06 01:04:44
I see nothing special.
He will reach good tech in 2 weeks.
Did see this several times in the past.
2022-05-06 03:06:55
He was 5.97 in technique in the second training :)
2022-05-06 07:57:28
come on, you know that 3 weeks on adequate technique is horrible talent but I know this player has good talent. And I have many similar cases to this one.
2022-05-06 08:44:30
nothing special with other pops. Check the next tech pop.
2022-05-06 08:53:30
"come on, you know that 3 weeks on adequate technique is horrible talent "

I know that 3 weeks of league games 90 minutes, on adequate (6) technique, at age 19, can be talent in the 3.0 to 5.6 range.
Poey says that he sees nothing special. So do I. ;)
2022-05-06 08:55:45
Pace to unearthy 5 weeks and technique to adequate 3 weeks? This looks really weird
I am more concerned about 5 weeks to unearthy pace, maybe you had some cheats?:)))
(edited)
2022-05-06 09:28:24
I had several players who popped after 5 weeks on 15/16 pace and now they jump on 5/6 technique after 3 weeks and you tell me this is ok, omg
I would never ever under normal circumstances kept a player that would have first jump after 3 weeks on at least lvl 9 technique
(edited)
2022-05-06 09:45:50
I would never ever under normal circumstances kept a player that would have first jump after 3 weeks on at least lvl 9 technique

this might be the real mistake in this story
2022-05-06 09:53:04
if you have nothing to say than please just stfu. I asked if there is not any kind of bug because many users recently started to complain about suspiciously slow training. And you try to completely shift the discussion and insult me.
2022-05-06 10:02:56
Can you show his further history? I need to see his earlier pops in pace.
2022-05-06 10:06:49
I see this kind of complaints or questions since the beginning of sokker, no changes recently. And I just said that it might be a mistake to regard players as untalented after such a three-week-pop. Why do you feel insulted by that?
2022-05-06 10:08:40
You get your answer : there s no evidence for a bug.

If an obvious bug were to disrupt training, you can be sure there would be much more users and complaining : teams are obsessed with training !
(edited)
2022-05-06 10:19:23
Maybe your coach has 16,99 in pace but only 16,01 in tech :)

... in addition to the player barely making it to 5 and now jumping well above 6,00.
2022-05-06 11:49:07
unfortunately I do not have Sokker viewer and sokker itself only provides very limited training history. But I have notes that he jumped to 12 and 13 pace after 4 weeks and 15 pace after 6 weeks.
I know that my main coach has rather high technique skill level, because I have him for many years and I know that by longterm training comparison with other coaches that the training was fastest with him